User talk:Dragonmonster8

Welcome!

Hello, Dragonmonster8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! <3 Clamster 01:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ASUE

Hello, Dragonmonster8 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to A Series of Unfortunate Events. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject A Series of Unfortunate Events, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of A Series of Unfortunate Events and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! <3 Clamster 01:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Teen Trends

A tag has been placed on Teen Trends, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Porcupine (prickle me!) 19:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fred (YouTube)

A tag has been placed on Fred (YouTube) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Barney Vitman

A tag has been placed on Barney Vitman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MightyWarrior (talk) 21:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of If Cupid Had A Heart

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article If Cupid Had A Heart, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletes

Please do not remove Speedy Delete tags. If you wish to object please use the {{hangon}} procedure. Thanks MrMarmite (talk) 12:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mikayla (Album)

I have nominated Mikayla (Album), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikayla (Album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Edgehead5150 ^talk 03:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ZoeOnAOL

A tag has been placed on ZoeOnAOL requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 16:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pickling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Versus22 (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sdjkfhdslkg vudsivh

A tag has been placed on Sdjkfhdslkg vudsivh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Guest9999 (talk) 21:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing other users' comments

Please don't edit other users' comments without their permission. If you do have their permission, please identify this clearly (e.g. in the edit summary). If you are indeed the same user, please identify this on the user pages belonging to both accounts. Brian Jason Drake 08:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sign your posts on talk pages

Please sign your posts on talk pages, which you can do by typing four tildes (~~~~). Brian Jason Drake 08:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Corn has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kill the Lights (Britney Spears Song)

The article Kill the Lights (Britney Spears Song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Irbisgreif (talk) 22:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arronn

A tag has been placed on Arronn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --Zvn (talk) 21:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Avi (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Avi (talk) 17:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dragonmonster8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason I was making nonconstructive edits was because my friend didn't believe that Wikipedia was a good website. I wanted to prove that if nonconstructive edits or false information was added, that Wikipedia would act, and wouldn't just let mistakes sit on their article. I realize it wasn't the best way to prove to her, but I was confident if I did, it would be reverted. I have been going to Wikipedia as my source if information, and I hope I continue to be a member, and I really, am sorry. Thanks for your time. Dragonmonster8 (talk) 00:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me that you won't disrupt Wikipedia again. Sandstein 05:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.