User talk:Elham24

Welcome!

Hello, Elham24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! _{Hydrogen Iodide} _(HI!) 02:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marseille

You have added a lot of pictures, some not very good, at irrelevant points in the article on Marseille. There was a discussion a long time ago about not cluttering the article with irrelevant pictures like a scrapbook. The pictures at present all carefully complement the text and are sparsely distributed. If you want to add pictures, please add them in the gallery with accurate subtitles. The text carefully describes the Porte d'Aix: no need for your Fodor's guide subtitle, which is inaccurate and unencyclopedic. Mathsci 20:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also Marseille is on the Cote Bleue - not the Cote d'Azure, i.e. the French Riviera. Please try to be more accurate - these are careless errors. Mathsci 20:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your pictures completely wrecked the article. Why on earth did you vandalize the article in this way with such awful and inappropriate photographs? Mathsci 20:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mini Arc de Triomphe.jpg

The file File:Mini Arc de Triomphe.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Low quality. Can be replaced with better files at c:Category:Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Historical Site.jpg

The file File:Historical Site.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Cathédrale de la Major de Marseille.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Historical SiteII.jpg

The file File:Historical SiteII.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:Palais Longchamp.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]