User talk:EmilyMcLean

This is EmilyMcLean's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Index of Open Source License Litigation (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sagotreespirit was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This would be good for a law journal, but the submission needs to read like an encyclopedia article. You may want to ask questions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Law.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Index of Open Source License Litigation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Index of Open Source License Litigation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 04:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Open Source License Litigation has been accepted

Open Source License Litigation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 02:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of references for Open source license litigation

Hello, I recently reviewed Open source license litigation for copyediting and noticed the article almost completely lacks references to reliable sources. There were a number of links to court documents, but these would be considered primary sources. I moved the majority of those references into supplemental external links since they don't stand as appropriate sources on their own. Please see Wikipedia's policy: No original research. The existence of reliable secondary or tertiary sources seems probable for such high-profile cases, and the article's contents should aggregate notable information from those sources without us contributing our own analysis or interpretation. Thank you. Popoki35 (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]