User talk:EnePaul225
February 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Enema, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Enema was changed by EnePaul225 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-02-27T18:47:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, EnePaul225, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Glad to see someone else with an interest in improving the Enema article! Bushytails (talk) 05:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Enema. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 13:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Enema, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Writing your opinions do not make an encyclopaedic article. Please provide references for all your claims. Gillyweed (talk) 21:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Enema. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gillyweed (talk) 01:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Enema. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 18:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Further Comment
[edit]Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. Can I suggest that before leaping in and modifying an article you get comfortable with some of the policies that govern how Wikipedia works. The fact that you claim to be an active member of the enema community does not give you the wherewithal to ignore the policies of Wikipedia and make changes and statements without references. See WP:REF for starters. I'd also like to suggest that you look at WP:3RR. I apologise for calling your changes vandalism (obviously the intent was not there) but simply reverting to your version without following the WP policies starts to look a lot like vandalism. I'm going to revert your changes again until they are properly referenced. And then you will be pleased to know I shall stop for 24 hours so I don't breach the WP 3R policy. Gillyweed (talk) 04:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)