User talk:Esau Benitez J. 2
Hello!
[edit]I like Wikipedia Esau Benitez J. 2 (talk) 02:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
2046 FIFA World Cup
[edit]There have been numerous articles about future sports competitions projected to take place decades in the future, and one after another they have been deleted after deletion discussions. This one will be deleted too. Please don't make it necessary for editors to spend time on discussing it by contesting the deletion. All time spent on such pointless discussions could instead have been spent on more constructive work for the encyclopaedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
JamesBWatson, why do you want to delete my newest wikipedia page? what is wrong with it? how come other soccer tournaments that will occur 3 decades from now like 2038 and 2042 still have a page? please dont delete this page, because i am trying to get as much information as possible. Esau Benitez J. 2 (talk) 20:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- The article has no sources. How do we know for example, that the event will be held in Egypt, as the article claims? We need substantial coverage of the event in reliable sources to demonstrate notability - that is, specific discussion of the 2046 tournament, with ample detail about which teams will appear, where it will be held, etc. This information does not yet exist, so we cannot include it. As for your argument that other similar pages exist, even were that a valid argument (which it isn't), at least some of those pages are also currently under discussion for deletion. Having said all of which, if you wish to challenge the deletion, and can provide a good argument as to why the article should be kept, and how detailed sources can be included in it, then you need to do so here, not on this Talk page. Anaxial (talk)
Here are the sources, just scroll down to the 3rd one https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/future-world-cup-hosts-2026-2030-2034-etc-where-does-australia-fit-in.781092/ Esau Benitez J. 2 (talk) 21:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- The source is not reliable Hhkohh (talk) 23:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- 2038 is in AFD and 2042 is in RfD when you create 2046Hhkohh (talk) 23:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also, you can not add unsourced context Hhkohh (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- 2038 is in AFD and 2042 is in RfD when you create 2046Hhkohh (talk) 23:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Denis Kopotun
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Denis Kopotun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 23:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
2046 FIFA World Cup listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2046 FIFA World Cup. Since you had some involvement with the 2046 FIFA World Cup redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Hhkohh (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
July 2018
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Hhkohh (talk) 00:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of 2046 FIFA World Cup for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2046 FIFA World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2046 FIFA World Cup (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hhkohh (talk) 15:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
July 2018
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tuesday, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please discuss your change on the talk page before re-instating. Most counting of days start the week on Monday. Tarl N. (discuss) 15:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also, the paragraph in question says specifically that it is according to ISO 8601 it is the second day of the week. noq (talk) 17:18, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Esau Benitez J. 2, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as EsauBJ4611 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. –Fredddie™ 00:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Fredddie i'm not using multiple accounts, instead these are the accounts I used to use because I had forgotten my password on all of them.
- Considering the edit histories of both accounts overlap, I'm inclined to not believe you. –Fredddie™ 01:57, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The last time I used EsauBJ4611 was like 2 or 3 months ago!
- Your first edit from this account was on 12 June - this edit. You were still using EsauBJ4611 ten days later, on 22 June - this edit. That undermines the credibility of your statement that you created this account because you forgot your old account's password. Tarl N. (discuss) 02:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mexican Federal Highway 134. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You cannot simply add your opinions. You may only document what has been published elsewhere. Tarl N. (discuss) 16:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- Your edits are disruptive - you don't seem to understand what you are doing, please stop until you have read Wikipedia's policies. Tarl N. (discuss) 16:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
I don't really think they are completely disruptive, plus i've even been on the highway 5 times, in 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2017. I know it's very curvy. Correct me if they are disruptive. And I'm sorry.
- The point you are missing is that your personal experience has no place in Wikipedia. Everything is required to be sourced. You cannot say "the curviest" just because you've been on the highway and you think it is curvy. Any statement of fact must be traced to a reliable source - See WP:RS. That is a failrly restrictive form of publication, not everything you find on the internet qualifies. And your personal opinion definitely does not. Please read the policy.
- The "disruptive" edit was the one you made to Lotsee, Oklahoma - here. You changed the field which documented what the estimate provided referred to, without providing a new estimate (and a new source). Instead, you left the article claiming that the 2015 estimate was for 2017.
- Until you understand more about what you are doing, and have read the Wikipedia policies, please stop making edits which damage articles. Tarl N. (discuss) 04:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Please start going through the above policies, to understand what is required to edit on Wikipedia. Thanks, Tarl N. (discuss) 17:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Oklahoma State Highway 650
[edit]Hello, Esau Benitez J. 2. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Oklahoma State Highway 650, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Oklahoma State Highway 650
[edit]Hello, Esau Benitez J. 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oklahoma State Highway 650".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:06, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
July 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, KOTV-DT, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
If you watch KOTV-DT and (I hope you do) you will see an ad saying that on August 5th, 2019 News on 6 is creating a 4PM newscast that will run from 4pm cdt to 5pm cdt. The ad said it would move dr phil to 3pm cdt
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Thanks for creating List of countries by population in 500 BC.
User:Lefcentreright while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
This is an very interesting subject. Please do expand. Thanks.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Lefcentreright (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
You broke a bunch of articles
[edit]You broke the reference section in your oklahoma edits on September 6. Please fix all of those edits, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Esau_Benitez_J._2
My following edit is an example of what you need to do to convert an article to 2020 census.
• Sbmeirow • Talk • 11:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Ok Esau Benitez J. 2 (talk) 12:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
"-3" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect -3. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 31#-3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Zacapuato, Guerrero moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Zacapuato, Guerrero, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible Talk 05:19, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- alright Esau Benitez J. 2 (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Zacapuato, Guerrero has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Greenman (talk) 13:13, 7 September 2022 (UTC)ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)