User talk:Evansknight

This is Evansknight's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johann Jakob Pfeiffer has been accepted

Johann Jakob Pfeiffer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 22:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Johann Jakob Pfeiffer

Hi there, thanks for translating this article! When you translate from the German-language wikipedia, can you please remember to add the "translated page" template to the talk page to attribute your translation? Link here: Template:Translated page. Thanks and welcome! -- asilvering (talk) 05:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will make sure to do that from now on. Evansknight (talk) 05:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carl Jonas Pfeiffer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Johann Jakob Pfeiffer. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know! Evansknight (talk) 13:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fredrick Arthur Willius has been accepted

Fredrick Arthur Willius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Curbon7 thank you so much! I had some questions about ways I want to incorporate more info into the article, but I'm not sure who to ask. I know you editors are always busy and nobody likely has the time to hold the hand of a newbie, but I've tried to google and look for style guidance to no avail.-Evansknight (talk) 21:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What questions do you have? Additonally, the WP:HELPDESK, WP:AFCHELPDESK, and WP:TEAHOUSE always have people on hand that are willing to offer assistance

Curbon7 (talk) 01:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life section

In many bio articles, "Personal life" is a section just before references. David notMD (talk) 18:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nastaliq calligraphy for Iran-related articles

Hi there. Nastaliq is a calligraphic script, not generally used for everyday Persian. Could you please stop adding it to Iran-related articles? (Referring to your latest edits). Its WP:UNDUE weight and basically irrelevant. Thanks! - LouisAragon (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. You also reverted several other edits I made that I’m confused about. Sayf ol-Dowleh and Dowlatshah’s info boxes, for instance. Both are titles, not names, and you reverted them so that their titles were reflected and not their names, which seems not to be in line with other info boxes from various other Qajar related articles? And you reverted a capitalization back to a typo. Am I missing something? Thanks again! Evansknight (talk) 02:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "name" parameter of the infobox oughts to reflect the title of the article as far as I know, not the subject's birth name. The parameter "birth_name" is a separate infobox parameter which can be added. As for the capitalization typo, my bad, sorry, you can re-add it. - LouisAragon (talk) 15:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LouisAragon I wanted to apologize again for cluttering up those articles. I had been working on articles pacific to the Mughal empire, and the convention for Persian in those articles, following Urdu, is to render it in nastaliq, and since Mirza Ghiyas Beg was a Mughal official, I followed the convention for his article, then lost track of time and got carried away. I think I have reverted all the edits I made. Again, I just wanted to clarify, when you reverted my nastaliq edits, did you just do a blanket revert, because in several instances I also made necessary changes, which you also reverted. For example, on the Mirza Ghiyas Beg article, the Persian version of his title is written in the article as "اعتمادالسلطنه آگهی الدوله" which, as a Persian speaker, you can see is incorrect, and it should be "اعتماد الدوله". I don't know how long it's been like that, because there are seemingly dozens of online usages of this specific string of words, all of which trace back to the wikipedia article. Thanks again! - Evansknight (talk) 15:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Evansknight! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! LouisAragon (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Devanagri name for Bhartripatta

Hi, I saw that you have made some edits to the page of Bhartripatta and the page of Allata. Although I am not sure how are you able to get the Devanagri script for the names as you did in these edits. Can you provide the sources? >>> Extorc.talk(); 20:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The Hindi wikipedia page for the Gohila Dynasty lists all of the rawals with their Devanagari names. -Evansknight (talk) 20:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extorc I noticed that you reverted the Devanagari on Allata back to the original. Was it listed incorrectly on the Hindi wiki? Or does the standard Hindi orthography difference from the original Sanskrit? -Evansknight (talk) 19:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. I would like to see an external source stating the spelling. >>> Extorc.talk(); 19:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. I've done some preliminary digging and so far most of the online results circle back to that list from the Hindi wikipedia. I've found a couple of instances through google books, but it's hard to search Devanagari words there, and I don't know if either of them would qualify as reliable sources. I'm going to try and see if I can find an image of the Shaktikumara inscription, or a Hindi text that describes it directly. Fingers crossed! -Evansknight (talk) 19:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talking about reliable sources is one thing but how is the word spelled itself when written in Hindi by ordinary people. (I know this is not the right way, but i think this is enough for us to favor my version of the spelling until we find evidence for yours.). here, here, here all use my version of the spelling and are the top search results when you search "Rawal Allata". >>> Extorc.talk(); 20:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And if you get hold of shaktikumar inscriptions, i would like to have a look at them as well. >>> Extorc.talk(); 20:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, until we have reliable sources for the other spelling, best to use the one most commonly used in everyday writing. Also, we may not need either one, per WP:INDICSCRIPTS, it seems the preferred is not house Indic scripts in the lead section or articles as a rule, which makes sense and helps avoid confusion like this, or in articles where they might be different versions in Hindi, Urdu, Sanskrit, Kannada, Malayalam, Tamil, Marathi, Bangali, etc... I'll keep you posted if I find an image of the inscriptions. -Evansknight (talk) 21:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thanks. >>> Extorc.talk(); 21:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Franz Georg Pfeiffer (German politician) has been accepted

Franz Georg Pfeiffer (German politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Adolf von Deines

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Adolf von Deines you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Adolf von Deines

The article Adolf von Deines you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Adolf von Deines for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 18:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Karl Ludwig Pfeiffer (German banker)

Hello, Evansknight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karl Ludwig Pfeiffer (German banker), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georg Ledderhose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hessian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich Pfeiffer

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from de.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 23:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I know that and I should have remembered. Evansknight (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Evansknight! Your additions to Draft:Karl Ledderhose have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of that. I copied and pasted information from the sources I'm using to remind myself of what the sources are there for until I work out the prose for the article itself. it's a draft, so it didn't occur to me that this would be a problem. Would it be better to move it to a userspace draft instead to avoid this kind of mixup? Evansknight (talk) 14:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but copyright material is not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia, not even in drafts, sandboxes, or talk pages. If you need to save such material, I suggest you use an external editor such as Microsoft Word or Google Docs. — Diannaa (talk) 14:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

duly noted. thank you. Evansknight (talk) 14:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If your draft contains other such copypastes, I would appreciate it if you would remove them. Thanks. — Diannaa (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. I will. Evansknight (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yusuf Adil Shah

Salma Ahmed Farooqui, A Comprehensive History of Medieval India: From Twelfth to the Mid-Eighteenth Century, (Dorling Kindersley, 2011), 174; "Yusuf Adil Khan of Turkish descent was the son of king Agha Murad of Turkey." --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I somehow missed that and noticed it right after I made the edit, and was literally about to revert it when you wrote me. However, I want to know what HER source is for that assertion, because 1. I have never seen such an assertion made in any Turkish sources, 2. King Agha Murad of Turkey is an insane way to refer to Murad II in a supposedly academic text, and 3. that sentence, along with pretty much every page of the book I was able to access through google, is so rife with grammatical and punctuation errors that I can't believe anyone would take it seriously as a reliable source. Evansknight (talk) 21:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- - Yeah, unfortunately if it is not present, rest assured some Turk nationalist will restore it ranting how I or some other editor is suppressing this information cause "they hate Turks"!
  - Perhaps a trip to RSN would resolve the issue? --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Afifa Karam

Hi Evansknight. You added a reference for "Badawī 2015" to Afifa Karam, but a cite for "Badawī 2001" (Afīfa Karam: Ḥayātuhā wa-a‘māluhā). Should the reference be 2001 as well, or is this a separate work? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 15:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was my mistake. I have corrected it. Thanks for pointing it out! Evansknight (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf von Deines

Hello, I would like to notify you that there is a broken reference in Adolf von Deines, which is related to your recent changes to the article. The problem is that there is no citation in the bibliography with von Priesdorff as author and with 1919 as year. Janhrach (talk) 18:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Evansknight (talk) 18:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Janhrach (talk) 18:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Albert Wigand (artist)

Hello, Evansknight. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Albert Wigand".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Wallace Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page District judge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]