User talk:Evenewyear

Porque editaste a Hellen toncio?

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Miss Earth 2015 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Miss Earth 2015 was changed by Evenewyear (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883699 on 2015-01-19T14:00:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evenewyear, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Evenewyear! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 24 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Bárbara Palacios page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss universe 2015

Miss Universe 2015 by --Sunuraju (talk) 05:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agnesa Vuthaj

Why is an article written about Eralda Hitaj? Postcard Cathy (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agnesa Vuthaj

A tag has been placed on Agnesa Vuthaj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Article on this subject was speedily deleted on January 20, 2015. And title doesn't match name in article. same or different people?

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Postcard Cathy (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Agnesa Vuthaj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Agnesa Vuthaj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agnesa Vuthaj

The article Agnesa Vuthaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Evidently won the Albanian beauty pageant, but did not win any world wide title. Fails WP:NMODEL and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Colombia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bogata. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Gavin DeGraw, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 13:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tonie Chisholm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tonie Chisholm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonie Chisholm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Venezuelan? Right?

Why did you delete references? You know that should not be. Donaldouglas (talk) 19:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Jaam0121?

Proposed deletion of Golsa Sarabi

Hello, Evenewyear. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Golsa Sarabi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Golsa Sarabi to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 21:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Miss Angola. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Banner talk 17:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Angola, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. The Banner talk 19:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agnesa Vuthaj

The article Agnesa Vuthaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject is not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 03:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Agnesa Vuthaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agnesa Vuthaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnesa Vuthaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 08:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Agnesa Vuthaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agnesa Vuthaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnesa Vuthaj (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]