User talk:EvilOne93

Welcome!

Hello, EvilOne93, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Zynga deletions

Welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you have flagged up a number of pages related to gaming, particularly browser-based video game by Zynga. It would be useful if you could explain why you are doing this, as it is likely to raise concerns that your edits are in fact biased against Zynga. I would also like to draw your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games where it would be great if you could contribute.Leutha (talk) 16:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ironholds (talk) 07:38, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear that you are either a sockpuppet or a troll; either way, the behaviour you have exhibited is not acceptable. Ironholds (talk) 07:38, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EvilOne93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked indefinitely for a ridiculous reason. This Admin clearly abused his or her power and blocking someone indefinitely for a first offence (I didn't even do anything wrong) is unacceptable and is rather unjustified. The said blocking Admin also accused me of being a sock puppet without even providing valid proof, and blocked me on this basis.EvilOne93 (talk) 08:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Having looked at contributions of the user, and contributions of the IP, this appears to be a wholly appropriate and in-policy block. Note that "admin abused powers" unblock requests will almost never be successful - this process is about your actions, and when their actions appear to be appropriate, you're simply left with having made ridiculous accusations that will taint any future request (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your familiarity with Wikipedia procedures and terminology makes it clear you've edited before, and hey, we even know where from. Blocking somebody for a first offence indefinitely is perfectly acceptable when the "first offence" spans a dozen articles and isn't actually a first offence. Ironholds (talk) 09:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]