User talk:Extra999/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Valued Picture nomination of File:Brygge Norway 2005-08-18.jpg

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Brygge Norway 2005-08-18.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 20:15, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Happy Birthday

Wishing Extra999/Archive 2 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 03:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 05:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture nomination of File:Polar Bear - Alaska.jpg

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Polar Bear - Alaska.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 14:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture nomination of File:Red Apple.jpg

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Red Apple.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 14:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture nomination of File:Milad Tower at Night2.JPG

File:Milad Tower at Night2.JPG

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Milad Tower at Night2.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 14:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at Acather96's talk page.
Message added 15:03, 29 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Barn

Thanks for the barnstar, much appreciated. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 03:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:37, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture nomination of File:GarnetCrystalUSGOV.jpg

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:GarnetCrystalUSGOV.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 06:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

VP

Sorry I havnt got back to you about Vp because I have been busy. I got a complaint from someone saying that VP doesn't check the image copyright. We need to start looking at that carefully Noe because we could be promoting a image that's not in public domain. Spongie555 (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

See I always check that, but i have never come across such an image. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 10:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

I can help out with this, one of my main areas of work is copyright cleanup. Acather96 (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for help. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 13:37, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at Acather96's talk page.
Message added 13:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

VPC

I can't close those yet beside they havnt had the 7 days required wait. Spongie555 (talk) 06:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture nomination of File:Planets2008.jpg

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Planets2008.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture nomination of File:Fiji goshawk savusavu june 2008.JPG

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Fiji goshawk savusavu june 2008.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture nomination of File:Gluehlampe 01 KMJ.png

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Gluehlampe 01 KMJ.png, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 17:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

User: Coolkid8

Keep up the cool work!

VPC promotions

I have never promoted pictures.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Are there instructions somewhere.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

VP

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:John Tenniel.png, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Spongie555 (talk) 04:31, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:LampFlowchart.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture nomination of File:HST-SM4.jpeg

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:HST-SM4.jpeg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture nomination of File:Liberty Bell 2008.jpg

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Liberty Bell 2008.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Acather96 (talk) 19:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Space reorganization

Hello WikiProject Space member! A discussion has been started regarding the future of WikiProject Space here; any comments you might have would be welcome! There are mainly two competing ideas:

1. Centralize all the Space-related WikiProjects, such as Astronomy and Spaceflight, and merge them into WikiProject Space, or
2. Separate the Astronomy and Spaceflight "sides" of WikiProject, and remove WikiProject Space.

If you can think of other options, that's great too. Your contribution to the discussion would be much appreciated. Thanks! :)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Space at 00:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC).

Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Police motorcycle

I've responded to your oppose, I hope it can convince you otherwise :) Acather96 (talk) 11:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

New VP

File:63buildinginseoulkorea.png

Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for valued picture status, File:63buildinginseoulkorea.png, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Spongie555 (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for not responding i been busy latly. Also maybe you want to look aagin at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ecchi due to new development in the nomination. Spongie555 (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Also the image is nominated for deletion on Commons i would look at that. Spongie555 (talk) 03:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at Acather96's talk page.
Message added 17:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-->

Banana and photograph - brightness

Hello, Extra999. Greetings from the Photography workshop. A reply has been made to your request. You may view the reply here.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Photography reply}} template.

PawełMM (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 09:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas
and a Happy New Year
to you and your family.

May your day be filled with
pleasant surprises.
Link to Image

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Sumsum2010 (talk) at 04:15, 20 December 2010 (UTC).

Delivery Successful

Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that your message delivery request (Merry Christmas) was completed successfully. Happy editing!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 04:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC).

And also to you --

Thanks; hope you have a happy holiday season and a satisfying 2011. Best, Wwheaton (talk) 04:12, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 14:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

For the Christmas wishes

Thank you for the Christmas wishes. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. Nascar1996 11:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 14:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the Merry Christmas! Sumsum2010·T·C 22:40, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:11, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Christmas Card

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png

Merry Christmas At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Green and Yellow Present.gif

File:Yellow and Red present.gif

File:Blue and Red Present.gif

Second would be the best. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:10, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the award. I hope to contribute more in days to come .. and wish more and more people participation. Manoj nav (talk) 19:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

The Downlink: Issue 1

The Downlink
Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight	Issue 1, January 2011
Welcome to The Downlink · Project News · News from Orbit · Article News · Space Stations and the Push for Featured Topics · Salyut 2 Welcome to The Downlink Welcome to the first full issue of The Downlink, a new monthly newsletter intended to inform members of WikiProject Spaceflight about the latest developments in the project and its articles. Below you will find information about happenings within the project, our recognised content, spaceflight in the news and events needing to be covered in articles. You will also find an editorial about the first concerted effort to develop featured topics related to spaceflight, and an article in need of your help and improvements. Project News will provide details of discussions about and changes in the organisation and structure of the project, newly recognised content, and changes in membership. News from Orbit will summarise spaceflight news and upcoming events, and list suggestions for articles in need of updating as a result. Article News will give details of requests for assistance within articles, and discussions regarding content. All members of WikiProject Spaceflight are invited to contribute any content that they would like to see in the newsletter, and we would particularly welcome the submission of editorials, or an article about an area of spaceflight which you are working on, or particularly interested in. Please see The Downlink page for more details. Project News A new working group has been formed. The space stations working group is expected to work towards creating Featured topics related to space stations. It currently has three members. Discussion within the project is still dominated by the reorganisation proposals. A discussion over the formation and roles of working groups and task forces has led to some clarification regarding working groups, however the roles of the task forces remain vague, and several proposals to abolish them have surfaced. The Human Spaceflight to-do list has been merged into the main project to-do list, with the combined list currently located on the Tasks page of the Spaceflight portal. A discussion regarding opening relations with the Aerospace biography task force of Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation was held, but no conclusions were reached. The Article Alerts bot has resumed operation, and a problem with the information the bot had been delivering was discussed and resolved. New assessment criteria for importance and quality have been implemented, and refinements continue to be made to the importance scale. The scope of the project was redefined to exclude astronomical objects explicitly. Although A-class criteria have been defined, a review process is yet to be discussed or implemented. Colds7ream conducted an analysis of open tasks related to the reorganisation which four major issues remain unresolved: Discussion concerning the existence and roles of task forces within the project; recruitment of new editors; updating guidelines and whether the project or the task forces should be responsible for maintaining them; and the continued existence of the Human spaceflight portal six weeks after consensus was reached to abolish it. Discussion about the structure of the project is ongoing, with several proposals currently on the table. One proposal calls for the abolition of task forces in favour of increased emphasis on working groups, whilst another calls for the task forces to become a list of topics. The idea of a formal collaboration system has been suggested, however opposition has been raised. One of the main open tasks at the moment is replacing the older {{WikiProject Space}} and {{WikiProject Human spaceflight}} banners with the new {{WikiProject Spaceflight}} banner. Articles which need to be retagged are currently listed in Category:WikiProject Spaceflight articles using deprecated project tags. ChiZeroOne is doing a very good job replacing them, but as of the morning of 31 December, there are still 1,424 left to be converted. Additionally, the implementation of a new B-class checklist built into the template has necessitated the reassessment of former B-class articles, which the template has automatically classified as C-class. News from Orbit On 3 December, USA-212, the first X-37B, landed at Vandenberg Air Force Base after a successful mission. On 5 December Proton-M with a Blok DM-03 upper stage failed to place three Glonass-M satellites into orbit, the first of three failures in less than forty eight hours. The NanoSail-D2 spacecraft was supposed to have been ejected from FASTSAT in the early hours of the next morning, however it does not appear to have separated. Finally the Akatsuki spacecraft failed to enter orbit around Venus in the evening of 6 December. The Proton launch was the maiden flight of the Blok DM-03, which does not currently have an article. On 8 December the Dragon C1 demonstration mission was conducted, with the SpaceX Dragon making a little under two orbits of the Earth on its maiden flight, before landing in the Pacific Ocean to complete a successful mission. The Falcon 9 rocket which launched the Dragon spacecraft also deployed eight CubeSats: SMDC-ONE 1, QbX-1, QbX-2, Perseus 000, Perseus 001, Perseus 002, Perseus 003 and Mayflower. The CubeSats do not currently have articles. On 15 December, a Soyuz-FG launched Soyuz TMA-20 to the International Space Station, carrying three members of the Expedition 26 crew. It docked two days later. The Soyuz TMA-20 article is currently short, and could use improvements to bring it up to the same level as articles for US manned spaceflights. On 17 December, a Long March 3A launched Compass-IGSO2. There is currently no article for this satellite. 17 December saw Intelsat regain control of the Galaxy 15 satellite, which had been out of control since a malfunction in April. The Galaxy 15 article is in need of serious cleanup and a good copyedit. On 25 December a GSLV Mk.I failed to place GSAT-5P into orbit. A Proton-M with a Briz-M upper stage successfully launched KA-SAT on 26 December. Barring any suborbital launches at the end of the month which have not yet been announced (a NASA Black Brant was scheduled for December but does not appear to have flown), 2010 in spaceflight concluded on 29 December when an Ariane 5ECA launched the Hispasat-1E and Koreasat 6 spacecraft. These do not currently have articles. Four launches are currently scheduled to occur in January 2011. A Delta IV Heavy is expected to launch NRO L-49 on 17 January. The satellite is expected to be an Improved Crystal electro-optical imaging spacecraft. Two launches are planned for 20 January, with Kounotori 2, the second H-II Transfer Vehicle, being launched by an H-IIB, and the Zenit-3F making its maiden flight to deploy Elektro-L No.1, the first Russian geostationary weather satellite to be launched since 1994. On 28 January Progress M-09M will be launched by a Soyuz-U. 28 January will also be the twenty-fifth anniversary of the loss of the Space Shuttle Challenger on mission STS-51-L. Article News It was requested that the article Walter Haeussermann be expanded. Haeussermann, a member of the von Braun rocket group, died on 8 December. Although the article has been updated following his death, a user requested that more information about the engineer be added. Another user requested that the articles Commercial Space Launch Act and Launch Services Purchase Act be created, to cover laws of the United States concerning spaceflight. Articles related to methods of taking-off and landing were discussed. The term VTVL currently has an article whilst VTHL and HTHL do not. It was suggested that the existing article should be merged, and each term be covered by the article for the equivalent aviation term, however some distinction between use in the fields of aviation and spaceflight should remain. Concern was raised that a large scale deletion request could cause many images to be lost from articles, help was requested to investigate whether any of the images were not subject to copyright, or if they were then whether they could be uploaded to the English Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. Concerns were raised about a large amount of content in the newly-created article deorbit of Mir duplicating existing content in existing Good Article Progress M1-5. A proposal to merge deorbit of Mir into Progress M1-5 was made, however objections were raised, and discussion has since stalled without reaching a consensus. It has also been requested that the article Mir be copyedited. The existence of separate categories for "spaceflight" and "space exploration" has been questioned, with a suggestion that some of the exploration categories, including Category:Space exploration iteslf, should be merged into their spaceflight counterparts. Missile Range Instrumentation Ship is currently listed at requested moves, with a proposal to rename it tracking ship. The only open good article nomination is of the book Mission: Earth, Voyage to the Home Planet, which is currently awaiting review. Editorial – Space Stations and the Push for Featured Topics There has recently been much talk about trying to increase the activity of the project. To this end, a major reorganisation effort has been undertaken, which has seen the space WikiProjects separated into the Astronomy, Solar System and Spaceflight groups, with WikiProject Space being abolished. We have also seen the child projects of WikiProject Spaceflight being abolished, with Timeline of Spaceflight becoming a working group, and the Unmanned and Human Spaceflight projects becoming task forces for now, with some suggestions that they should be abolished outright. The problem with the previous structure was that there were too many different groups of editors, and nobody was sure which projects were supposed to be doing what. Now there is only one project, this is somewhat clearer, but spaceflight is still a huge topic. Another way to improve the activity of the project is to attract more editors. Spaceflight is a topic which many people have at least a very casual interest in, and therefore it is strange that there are only about four or five people regularly participating in discussions on the project talk page. Evidently action is needed to raise the profile of the project. One way in which the project's profile can be raised is to have a major success associated with it. The creation of a featured topic could be one such success, and would also be hugely beneficial to articles in the area that it relates to. Space Stations are one of the most high-profile and notable areas of spaceflight, and are therefore a logical choice to spearhead such an initiative. To this end, in late December a working group was established to concentrate and coordinate efforts to establish featured topics related to space stations. An initial proposal calls for topics on Skylab, Salyut, Mir and the International Space Station, as well as one on space stations in general. There is currently an effort to get Mir promoted to Good Article status; the article currently requires a copyedit, after which it will be sent for peer review and then to GAN. This is by no means a short-term project. There are many articles, particularly for the larger space stations such as the ISS and Mir, which are currently nowhere near becoming recognised content. Skylab is the smallest of the proposed featured topics, but it still requires that three C-class articles, two Start-class articles and a redirect all reach at least Good Article status, with at least three becoming Featured Articles. The ISS topic is so large that it may have to be subdivided. I don't expect that we will have any featured topics by the end of the year, but I believe that a Good Topic, which requires all articles reach at least GA status, but does not require any featured articles, may be possible. I also believe that several articles on the subject can easily be improved to Good Article status, and some articles may be at featured level by the end of the year. In the long term, having featured topics will benefit the project and its content. Selected Article – Salyut 2 Salyut 2 was an early space station, launched in 1973 as part of the Salyut and Almaz programmes. It malfunctioned two days after launch, and consequently was never visited by a manned Soyuz mission. The Salyut 2 article describes the station: “ Salyut 2 (OPS-1)(Russian: Салют-2; English: Salute 2) was launched April 4, 1973. It was not really a part of the same program as the other Salyut space stations, instead being the highly classified prototype military space station Almaz. It was given the designation Salyut 2 to conceal its true nature. Despite its successful launch, within two days the as-yet-unmanned Salyut 2 began losing pressure and its flight control failed; the cause of the failure was likely due to shrapnel piercing the station when the discarded Proton rocket upper stage that had placed it in orbit later exploded nearby. On April 11, 1973, 11 days after launch, an unexplainable accident caused the two large solar panels to be torn loose from the space station cutting off all power to the space station. Salyut 2 re-entered on May 28, 1973. ” The article is currently assessed as start class, and is in need of attention. It consists of the above paragraph, along with a list of specifications and an infobox. The article needs to be rewritten in a more encyclopaedic style, and with more information about the space station. It has not yet been determined whether Salyut 2 would have to be included in a featured topic about the Salyut programme, or whether since it was never manned it is less integral to the topic, however if its inclusion were necessary then in its current form it would be a major impediment to this. Downlink readers are encouraged to improve this article, with a view to getting it to B-class and possibly a viable Good Article candidate by the end of the month. Published by WikiProject Spaceflight, if you have any content you wish to include in future newsletters, please contribute

You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 14:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC).

February 2011 Wikification Drive

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wikiproject Wikify at 00:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC).

WikiProject Wikify's Coordinator Election

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 22:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC).

The Wikifier, WikiProject Wikify's First Newsletter (January 2011)

The Wikifier Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume I, Issue I, January 2011 From the editor • General news Membership • December drive results To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Welcome to WikiProject Wikify's first newsletter! This newsletter will be published every two months, right before the start of the upcoming drive. February's Drive is projected to be a huge success, with announcements posted at The Signpost and Community Portal. Participants will be rewarded with barnstars. Sign up if you have not already! Project Coordinator elections are still open until February 1, 2011. Happy Wikifying, The coordinators of The Wikifier: Mono (talk) and Sumsum2010·T·C·Review me!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 02:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC).

The Downlink: Issue 2

The Downlink
Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight	Issue 2, February 2011
Project News · News from Orbit · Article News · The Charts · Yuri Gagarin Project News A report on popular pages from December 2010 revealed surprising trends in readers' interests. Boeing X-37 was the most popular article within the project's scope, with SpaceX Dragon in second with Global Positioning System in third place. The top seven articles were all assessed as C-class, with the remainder of the top ten being Good Articles. It was noted with some concern that moon landing conspiracy theories was more popular than moon landing. A discussion regarding whether missiles warranted inclusion within the project scope was conducted, and resulted in the continued inclusion of missiles. The last remaining articles tagged with the banner of the former Human Spaceflight WikiProject were re-tagged with the WikiProject Spaceflight banner. The last banner was removed on 8 January, and the template has since been deleted. The project is thankful to ChiZeroOne for his work in this field. Concerns were raised that the new article reporting system was not working correctly, however it was noted that there is sometimes a delay before articles appear on the list. Discussion regarding the existence of the separate spaceflight and space exploration category structures led to a mass CfD being filed on 10 January to abolish the space exploration categories, merging them into their counterparts in the spaceflight category structure. This was successful, and the exploration categories have been removed. Several other categorisation issues remain unresolved. A proposal was made to standardise some of the infoboxes used by the project, the future of Template:Infobox spacecraft (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) was discussed, and design work began on a replacement. Template:Rocket specifications-all (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) was nominated for deletion and subsequently kept due to extant substitutions, however it was noted that the template had been deprecated by WikiProject Rocketry. Concerns were also raised that the existing infoboxes were not well-equipped to handle spacecraft which operated in more than one orbit, or whose orbits changed over the course of their missions (which in practise is most of them). Five members of the project gave interviews for the Wikipedia Signpost, and a report on the project, authored by SMasters (talk · contribs), is expected to be published in the 7 February edition of the Signpost. It is hoped that this will raise interest in and awareness of the project. News from orbit Four orbital launches were conducted in January, beginning on 20 January with the launch of Elektro-L No.1 on the first Zenit-3F rocket. This was followed later the same day by the launch of a Delta IV Heavy with the USA-224 reconnaissance satellite. The articles for USA-224 and the Zenit-3F rocket could use some expansion, whilst the Elektro-L No.1 satellite needs its own article. On 22 January, an H-IIB launched the second H-II Transfer Vehicle, Kounotori 2, to resupply the International Space Station. It arrived at the station on 27 January. Less than a day after its arrival, another cargo mission was launched to the station; Progress M-09M departed Baikonur early in the morning of 28 January, docking on 30 January. In addition to payloads to resupply the station, the Progress spacecraft is carrying a small subsatellite, Kedr, which will be deployed in February. Kedr does not currently have an article. Progress M-08M departed on 24 January to make the Pirs module available for Progress M-09M, and has since reentered the atmosphere. Its article needs to be updated to reflect the successful completion of its mission. The NanoSail-D2 satellite, which failed to deploy from FASTSAT in December, unexpectedly separated from its parent craft and began operations on 18 January, with its solar sail deploying on 21 January. Nine orbital launches are scheduled to occur in February, beginning with the launch of the first Geo-IK-2 satellite; Geo-IK-2 No.11, atop a Rokot/Briz-KM, on the first day of the month. Articles need to be written for the Geo-IK-2 series of satellites, as well as for Geo-IK-2 No.11 itself, and the Briz-KM upper stage that will be used to insert it into orbit. A Minotaur I rocket will launch NRO L-66, a classified payload for the US National Reconnaissance Office, on 5 February. The payload has not yet been identified, however once more details are known, it will need an article. Iran is expected to launch the Rasad 1 and Fajr 1 satellites in February, with 14 February the reported launch date. The satellites will fly aboard a single rocket; either the first Simorgh or the third Safir. Once this launch occurs, the satellites will need articles, and the article on their carrier rocket will require updating. The second Automated Transfer Vehicle, Johannes Kepler, is scheduled to launch on 15 February to resupply the ISS. Docking is expected to occur on 23 February. 23 February will also see the much-delayed launch of Glory atop a Taurus-XL 3110 rocket. This will be the first Taurus launch since the launch failure in early 2009 which resulted in the loss of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory. In addition to Glory, three CubeSats will be deployed; KySat-1, Hermes and Explorer-1 [PRIME]. KySat and Hermes require articles, whilst the article on Explorer-1 [PRIME] needs to be updated. On 24 February, a Soyuz-2.1b/Fregat rocket will launch the first Glonass-K1 satellite; Glonass-K1 No.11. Articles are needed for the series of spacecraft, as well as for the specific satellite being launched. It is likely that a Kosmos designation will be given to the payload when it reaches orbit. In the evening of 24 February, Space Shuttle Discovery will begin its final mission, STS-133, carrying the Permanent Multipurpose Module, a conversion of the Leonardo MPLM, to the ISS. Other payloads include an ExPRESS Logistics Carrier, and the Robonaut2 experimental robot. The first manned mission of 2011, Discovery's six-man crew will transfer equipment to the station, and two EVAs will be performed. The launch has already been scrubbed five times, before Discovery was rolled back to the Vehicle Assembly Building to inspect and repair cracks on its External Tank. At some point in February, a Long March 3B rocket is expected to launch two navigation satellites; Compass-M2 and Compass-M3, as part of the Compass navigation system. The date of this launch is currently unknown. Both satellites will require articles once more information is available. A PSLV launch, carrying the Resourcesat-2, X-Sat and YouthSat spacecraft, is expected to launch from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre towards the end of the month, probably between 20 and 23 February. Stop press: The Rokot launch was conducted at 14:00 UTC on 1 February, and at the time of writing it appears to have ended in failure, due to a suspected upper stage malfunction. The spacecraft is in orbit, it is not clear at the time of writing whether it will be salvageable. Article news Reaction Engines Skylon is currently undergoing peer review, its discussion page can be found at Wikipedia:Peer review/Reaction Engines Skylon/archive1. A user requested feedback on major changes which had been made to the article, however at the time of writing no responses have been offered. Following up on the issues covered in the last issue, the requested move of Missile Range Instrumentation Ship to Tracking ship was successful, with the article being renamed. The discussion concerning types of launch and landing resulted in a proposal to merge VTVL into VTOL, however this has been met with some opposition. Several other options have been suggested on Talk:VTVL. The large scale deletion of mis-tagged Soviet images on Commons went ahead, with most of the useful ones having already been backed-up locally under fair use criteria. Discussion was held regarding the naming of spaceflight-related articles. Concerns were raised regarding inconsistency in article titles and disambiguators. A project guideline was adopted to standardise titles, with the parenthesised disambiguators "(satellite)" and "(spacecraft)" being adopted as standards for spacecraft, and the exclusion of manufacturers' names from article titles was recommended. Issues regarding Japanese spacecraft with two names, the correct names for early Apollo missions, and dealing with acronyms and abbreviated names remain unresolved. A large number of articles were moved to conform to the standard disambiguation pattern. In addition, several Requested Moves were debated. A proposal to move SpaceX Dragon to Dragon (spacecraft), which began prior to the adoption of the standardised disambiguators, was successful. Atmospheric reentry was subject to two requested moves, firstly one which would have seen it renamed spacecraft atmospheric reentry, which was unsuccessful, however a second proposal shortly afterwards saw it moved to atmospheric entry. A proposal currently under discussion could see Lunar rover (Apollo) renamed Lunar Roving Vehicle Questions surrounding the transliteration of Russian names resurfaced, with a proposal to rename Vladimir Chelomey to Vladimir Chelomei being closed with no consensus, and a proposal to rename Yury Usachov to Yuri Usachev ongoing. Several long-standing merger proposals were closed. A proposal to merge Venera 15 and Venera 16 into Venera 15 and 16 was closed as no consensus, with the combined page being moved to Venera 4V-2 to reduce the overlap in the articles' scopes. Returnable satellite was merged into Fanhui Shi Weixing. Experimental Assembly of Structures in EVA and Assembly Concept for Construction of Erectable Space Structures was nominated for Good Article reassessment due to concerns over the article's quality. Doubts were also expressed over the thoroughness of the original review conducted upon its nomination for GA status. It was also suggested that the article's title may not be the most common name for the experiment, and that it might be necessary to move the page. Concerns were also raised regarding whether Space Interferometry Mission was up-to-date, however these are being addressed. Mission: Earth, Voyage to the Home Planet looks likely to be promoted to GA status. Help was requested for adding citations to List of Mir spacewalks. A request was made that STS-88 be reviewed against the B class criteria, and suggestions for improvements made. Another user requested improvements to the article Yuri Gagarin, with a view to having the article promoted to featured status in time for the fiftieth anniversary of his Vostok 1 mission. As a result of this request, Yuri Gagarin is this month's selected article. Questions were raised as to whether an article or category should be created to cover derelict satellites. The categorisation of spacecraft by the type of rocket used to place them into orbit was also suggested. In another categorisation issue, it was questioned whether Space law should fall under space or spaceflight. Stop press: Mission: Earth, Voyage to the Home Planet has now been promoted to GA status. The Charts There is no editorial this month as no content was submitted for one. Instead, we present the "top ten" most popular articles within the project, based on the number of page views in January. Space Shuttle Challenger disaster was the most popular article of the last month, up fourteen places from 15th in December. Space Shuttle Challenger was the highest climber in the top 40, up 42 places from 50th. December's most popular article. Boeing X-37, dropped 57 places to 58th. On a happier note further down the chart, moon landing is now ahead of moon landing conspiracy theories. № Article Movement 1 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster ↑14 (15) 2 Richard Branson ↑5 (7) 3 Neil Armstrong ↑2 (5) 4 Space Shuttle Columbia disaster ↑16 (20) 5 Global Positioning System ↓2 (3) 6 Apollo 11 ↑2 (8) 7 Satellite ↑4 (11) 8 Space Shuttle Challenger ↑42 (50) 9 Apollo 13 ↓3 (6) 10 NASA ↓1 (9) For the full list of the top 1,500 popular pages within the project, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Popular pages (or the archived record for January). Selected Article: Yuri Gagarin Yuri Gagarin was the first man to fly in space, aboard Vostok 1 in April 1961. He was subsequently awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union, and was training for a second flight at the time of his death in 1968. His article describes him and his spaceflight experience: “ Yuri Alekseyevich Gagarin (Russian: Ю́рий Алексе́евич Гага́рин, Russian pronunciation: [ˈjurʲɪj ɐlʲɪˈksʲeɪvʲɪtɕ ɡɐˈɡarʲɪn]; 9 March 1934 – 27 March 1968), Hero of the Soviet Union, was a Soviet cosmonaut who on 12 April 1961 became the first human to journey into outer space. On 12 April 1961, Gagarin became the first man to travel into space, launching to orbit aboard the Vostok 3KA-3 (Vostok 1). His call sign in this flight was Kedr (Cedar; Russian: Кедр). During his flight, Gagarin famously whistled the tune "The Motherland Hears, The Motherland Knows" (Russian: "Родина слышит, Родина знает"). The first two lines of the song are: "The Motherland hears, the Motherland knows/Where her son flies in the sky". This patriotic song was written by Dmitri Shostakovich in 1951 (opus 86), with words by Yevgeniy Dolmatovsky. ” The article is currently assessed as C class, and had been assessed as B class prior to the criteria being redefined. Although a full reassessment has not yet been made, it seems close to the B class criteria, however details on his spaceflight experiences are somewhat lacking. It has been requested that the article be developed to Featured status by April, in time for the fiftieth anniversary of his mission. Published by WikiProject Spaceflight, if you have any content you wish to include in future newsletters, please contribute

You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 00:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun!

Get going! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun. Please get started, as the drive aims to wikify over 2,000 articles this month. We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to join up as well. In case you didn't know, wikification is fairly simple: just add wiki markup, links, and similar formatting. Thanks for joining; we're looking forward to an exciting time this month! Regards, Guoguo12 (talk · contribs), Mono (talk · contribs), Nolelover (talk · contribs), and Sumsum2010 (talk · contribs).

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 00:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

Belated...

Thanks for the Christmas greeting! Sorry so late to respond to it. I am not very religious myself (a church-going agnostic — talk about confused....) but there are several priests here from India whom I value greatly. One is from Darjeeling, not to far from you I guess; another from Goa. Anyhow, I hope you had a good Christmas. Wwheaton (talk) 00:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive Needs Your Help!

Please help! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive is almost complete. Please help, as the backlog is still very large. Still exceeding 20,000 articles! The goal is 18,000 or less. Lets see if we can do it! We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to help as well.Thank you for all your help thus far! Regards, Guoguo12 (talk · contribs), Mono (talk · contribs), Nolelover (talk · contribs), Sumsum2010 (talk · contribs), and WikiCopter (talk · contribs).

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

The Downlink: Issue 3

The Downlink
Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight	Issue 3, March 2011
Project News News from Orbit Article News Direction of the Project The Charts Europa Project News There have been very few discussions relating to the administration of the project in the last month, as things start to settle down after the merger. An invitation template has been created in an effort to attract new users to the project. Discussion was also held regarding the creation of a list of common templates, however no conclusions were reached. A proposal was made to implement an A-class assessment process, however editors are undecided about whether it would be best to copy the system used by another project such as WP:MILHIST, or to develop one specifically for the requirements of this project. User:ChiZeroOne has set up a collaboration page in his userspace, initially focussing on articles related to Skylab. Collaboration pages were at one point proposed as part of the structure of the Spaceflight project itself, however no consensus was achieved on the issue. If this collaboration is successful, it could open the door to a reevaluation of that situation. News from orbit Five orbital launches were conducted in February, out of nine planned. The first, that of the Geo-IK-2 No.11 satellite atop a Rokot/Briz-KM ended in failure after the upper stage malfunctioned. The Rokot has since been grounded pending a full investigation; the satellite is in orbit, but has been determined to be unusable for its intended mission. A replacement is expected to launch within the year. A general article on Geo-IK-2 satellites is needed, to supplement those on the individual satellites. A Minotaur I rocket launched USA-225, or NROL-66, on 6 February following a one-day delay. The second Automated Transfer Vehicle, Johannes Kepler, was successfully launched on 16 February to resupply the ISS. Docking occurred successfully on 24 February, several hours before Space Shuttle Discovery launched on its final flight, STS-133. Discovery docked with the ISS on 26 February, delivering the Leonardo module and an ExPRESS Logistics Carrier to the station. Following several delays, a Soyuz-2.1b/Fregat rocket launched the first Glonass-K1 satellite; Glonass-K1 No.11, on 26 February. It is currently unclear as to whether the satellite has received a Kosmos designation or not. Seven launches are expected to occur in March. On 4 March, the Glory satellite will launch atop a Taurus-XL 3110 rocket. Three CubeSats will be also be deployed by the Taurus; KySat-1, Hermes and Explorer-1 [Prime]. KySat and Hermes require articles, whilst the article on Explorer-1 [PRIME] needs to be updated. This launch was originally scheduled for February, but following a scrubbed launch attempt, it was delayed. 4 March will also see the launch of the first flight of the second X-37B, atop an Atlas V 501. An article is needed for that flight, which will probably receive a USA designation once it reaches orbit. On 8 March, Discovery is expected to land, bringing to an end the STS-133 mission, and retiring from service 27 years after its maiden flight. On 11 March, a Delta IV Medium+(4,2) will launch the NROL-27 payload. Whilst the identity of this payload is classified, it is widely believed to be a Satellite Data System communications satellite, bound for either a molniya or geostationary orbit. An article for this payload is required. 16 March will see the return to Earth of Soyuz TMA-01M, carrying three members of the ISS Expedition 26 crew. A Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle is expected to deploy the Resourcesat-2, X-Sat and YouthSat spacecraft during a launch in March. The flight has been delayed several times, and was expected to have launched last month, however it is currently scheduled to occur no earlier than 20 March. On 29 March, an Ariane 5ECA will launch the Yahsat 1A and New Dawn communications satellites. Both currently require articles. On 30 March, a Soyuz-FG will launch the manned Soyuz TMA-21 mission to the International Space Station carrying three Expedition 27 crewmembers. On 31 March, a Proton-M/Briz-M launch will carry the SES-3 and Kazsat-2 spacecraft into orbit, in the first dual-launch of commercial communications satellites on a Proton. Several other launches may occur in March, however their status is unclear. Last month, a Long March 3B rocket was expected to launch two navigation satellites; Compass-M2 and Compass-M3, however this launch did not take place. It is unclear if it has been delayed to March, or further. The launch of the Tianlian 2 communications satellite on a Long March 3C may also be conducted in March, or possibly April. Both the Compass and Tianlian launches would occur from the same launch pad, which requires a turnaround of almost a month between launches, so it is unlikely that both will happen in March. A Safir launch, which had been expected in February, now appears to have been delayed to April, but given the secrecy of the Iranian space programme, this is unclear. Article news Discussion regarding the merger of articles on launch and landing modes seems to have stagnated, with no consensus being reached on any existing proposal. A discussion regarding changes in the sizes of Soviet and American rockets during the 1950s and early 1960s was conducted, with claims that rockets became smaller in that period being dismissed, however it was noted that smaller rockets were developed with equivalent capacity to older ones were developed, as well as much larger ones with increased capacities. Category:Derelict satellites orbiting Earth was created as a result of discussion surrounding the categorisation of derelict satellites. Concerns have also been raised that satellites are being listed as no longer being in orbit whilst still in orbit and derelict, and a discussion was held on how their status could be verified. An effort to categorise spacecraft by the type of rocket used to launch them is underway, however the categorisation of satellites by country of launch was rejected. It was reported that a sidebar has been created for articles related to the core concepts of spaceflight. Editors noted that it should only be used for core concepts, and not where it would conflict with an infobox. An anonymous user requested the creation of an article on moon trees. It was pointed out that the subject already had an article, and a redirect was created at the title proposed by the anonymous user. Concerns were raised regarding the quality of the article Japan's space development. Editors noted that the article appeared to be a poorly-translated copy of an article from the Japanese Wikipedia, although there have been some signs of improvement. Discussion regarding moving the article to Japanese space program is ongoing, however a move request has not yet been filed. A particular concern was raised regarding false claims in the article Van Allen radiation belt. In one case a scientist to whom one of the claims had been attributed was contacted, and clarified that he had made a remark to that effect as a joke in the 1960s, but was not entirely sure how or why it had been included in the article. Other concerns were raised before the discussion moved to WikiProject Astronomy. A question was raised regarding the copyright status of images credited to both NASA and ESA, particularly with regard to images of the launch of the Johannes Kepler ATV. The discussion reached no general conclusions, however it was found that the specific images that were suggested for inclusion in the article could be used, since they were explicitly declared to be in the public domain. A template, Template:Spaceflight landmarks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), was created to cover landmarks in the United States that are related to spaceflight. Several sources of public-domain NASA images were also discussed, and it was noted that almost all NASA images are public domain, however there are some exceptions. It has been proposed that Leonardo MPLM be merged with Permanent Multipurpose Module since the two cover separate uses of the same spacecraft. A review of the article STS-88 has also been requested. Three new Good Articles have been listed: Mission: Earth, Voyage to the Home Planet, Bold Orion and SA-500D. Orion (spacecraft) was delisted after concerns that it contained out-of-date content. SA-500D is currently undergoing good article reassessment, using the community reassessment method, after the review of its good article nomination was criticised for being lenient and not sufficiently thorough. Mir, Mark E. Kelly and Reaction Engines Skylon have been nominated for Good Article status and are awaiting review, whilst List of Mir spacewalks is undergoing a peer review with a view to it becoming a featured list. Editorial: Direction of the Project Well folks, its now been more than three months since the discussion that reformed the space-related WikiProjects, and in that time we've had a number of achievements we can be rightly proud of; we've gathered members up to a total of 43, improved awareness of the project via an interview in the Signpost, and refreshed the spaceflight portal into an attractive, up-to-date and useful page. Meanwhile, User:ChiZeroOne has made a sterling effort in clearing up talk page templates belonging to prior projects, we've managed to sort out various policies, started work on rearranging our templates, and User:GW Simulations has begun this excellent monthly newsletter for us. However, there are a few areas of the project that seem to be passing by the wayside, specifically the areas dedicated to fostering collaboration on articles and article sets between the project members, so here I present a call for more collaboration on the project. Presumably, the lack of collaboration is due to folks not being aware of what's going on, so here's a quick rundown of some of the ways you get involved in the group effort. Firstly, and most importantly, it'd be fantastic if more members got involved in the discussions ongoing at the project's main talk page, found at WT:SPACEFLIGHT. There are several discussions ongoing there, such as the relaunch of the spacecraft template, requests for assistance with various assessment and copyright queries, and conversations regarding category organisations, which affect many more articles, and thus editors, than are currently represented in the signatures so far. Secondly, it was established earlier on in the project's formation that a great way to attract more editors would be to develop some good or featured topics. There are a couple of efforts ongoing to try to see this idea to fruition, such as the Space stations working group and ChiZeroOne's own collaboration page, currently focussed on Skylab-related articles. These pages, however, have been notably lacking in activity lately, which is a shame, as their aims, given enough editor input, would really see the project furthering itself. Similarly, there are a number of requests for assessment for articles to be promoted to GA class, among other things, on the Open tasks page, which lists all of the activities needing input from members. If everyone could add this page to their watchlists and swing by it regularly, we could power through the good topics in extremely short order! Other things that could do with being added to people's watchlists include Portal:Spaceflight/Next launch‎, the many templates at Template:Launching/Wrappers and the task list at Portal:Spaceflight/Tasks. Finally, I'd like to try and get people involved in finally settling the organisational problem we have with reference to the task forces and working groups. Whilst the Timeline of spaceflight working group is a continuation of the old Timeline of spaceflight WikiProject and thus is ticking over nicely and the space stations working group has been mentioned previously in this editorial, the task forces (Human spaceflight and Unmanned spaceflight) in particular are currently dead in the water. I'm unsure as to whether or not this is because people are unaware of their existence, they clash too much with one another and the rest of the project or because people don't see a need for them, but if interested parties could make themselves known and others voice suggestions for getting rid of them, we can decide either if they're worth keeping and get them running again, or do away with a layer of bureaucracy and close them down. Any thoughts on the matter would be much appreciated. In summary, then, we've got a great project going here, with a nice set of articles, a good editor base and lots of ways of getting involved. Thus, a plea goes out to everyone to get involved, get editing with the other project members, and hopefully we'll see ourselves take off in a manner not dissimilar to the trajectory dear old Discovery took last week. Many thanks for everyone's hard work so far, and poyekhali! :-) The Charts Since it is useful to keep track of the most viewed pages within the project's scope, it seems like a good idea to continue this feature, which was originally included in last month's issue as a one-off. Satellite was the most popular article of February, up six places from seventh in December. STS-133 was the highest climber in the top 10, up 78 places from 88th. January's most popular article, Space Shuttle Challenger disaster, dropped seven places to eighth. Moon landing remains ahead of moon landing conspiracy theories for the second month in a row. Of the top ten, two articles are featured content, two are listed as Good Articles, and the remaining six are assessed as C-class. № Article Movement 1 Satellite ↑6 (7) 2 Space Shuttle ↑11 (13) 3 NASA ↑7 (10) 4 Neil Armstrong ↓1 (4) 5 Apollo 13 ↑4 (9) 6 Global Positioning System ↓1 (5) 7 International Space Station ↑5 (12) 8 Space Shuttle Challenger disaster ↓7 (1) 9 Apollo 11 ↓3 (6) 10 STS-133 ↑78 (88) For the full list of the top 1,500 popular pages within the project, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Popular pages (or the archived record for February). Selected Article: Europa Europa was a rocket developed by a multinational European programme in the 1960s. Consisting of British, French and German stages, it was intended to provide a European alternative to the US rockets used for the launch of most Western satellites to that date. Although the British Blue Streak first stage performed well on all flights, problems with the French and German stages, as well as the Italian-built payload fairing, resulted in the failure of all multistage test flights and orbital launch attempts. The programme was abandoned after the failure of the Europa II's maiden flight in 1971. The article Europa (rocket), describes it: “ The Europa rocket was an early expendable launch system of the European Launcher Development Organisation (ELDO), which was the precursor to the European Space Agency and its Ariane family of launchers. The programme was initiated by the UK and the first launch occurred in August 1967. Tasks were to be distributed between nations: the United Kingdom would provide the first stage (derived from the Blue Streak missile), France would build the second and Germany the third stage. The Europa programme was divided into 4 successive projects : Europa 1: 4 unsuccessful launches Europa 2: 1 unsuccessful launch Europa 3: Cancelled before any launch occurred Europa 4: Study only, later cancelled The project was marred by technical problems. Although the first stage (the British Blue Streak) launched successfully on each occasion, it was the second or third stage that failed. ” The article is currently assessed as start-class, and is missing a lot of information. It also lacks some basic features such as inline citations. Since Europa was a fairly major programme, enough information should be available to produce a much higher quality article, and it could probably be brought up to GA status with enough effort. Published by WikiProject Spaceflight, if you have any content you wish to include in future newsletters, please contribute

You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Spaceflight at 09:06, 3 March 2011 (UTC).

WikiProject Wikify's March Mini Drive

WikiProject Wikify's March Mini! Hello, I thought you would be interested in the March Mini, a coordinated effort by WikiProject Wikify members to eliminate the 2008 backlog of articles tagged with {{wikify}} and/or {{dead end}}. Come join in the fun! There are only three prizes to be won, including a special barnstar created just for this drive! Regards, WikiProject Wikify

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC).

The Wikifier: March 2011

The Wikifier Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume I, Issue II, March 2011 From the editor • General news Membership • February drive results To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Hello Wikifiers! Sorry this Newsletter is late, It should have gone out a month ago. I've been very busy in real life and didn't have time to get over to the newsletter. In this edition of the Newsletter, we have an editorial written by our new executive coordinator; Guoguo12. Guoguo12 has succeeded Mono due to an indefinite wikibreak. We also have the results of the February and March Mini drives. Happy Wikifying, Sumsum2010, the assistant coordinator of WikiProject Wikify

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC).

June 2011 Wikification Drive

Sumsum2010·T·C 04:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Great Page for Great People....... 12:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC) HAPPY EDITING !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wasimmogal2007 (talk • contribs)

WikiProject Wikify Discussion Invitation

Sumsum2010·T·C 23:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

hi

i am apurv your old friend. plaese give me your contact no. i have lots to talk. thanks bye @purv Mishra 05:17, 17 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apurv1999 (talk • contribs)

email address

hi, my email address is apurvmishra60@gmail.com and whats yours. @purv Mishra 10:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apurv1999 (talk • contribs)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Extra999, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

WikiProject Wikify's August Newsletter

The Wikifier Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume I, Issue IV, October 2011 Front Cover • From the editor • General news Membership • August drive results To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

October 2011 Wikification drive

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 16:37, 25 September 2011 (UTC).

WikiProject Wikify's October Newsletter

The Wikifier Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume I, Issue IV, October 2011 Front Cover • From the editor • General news Membership • August drive results To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 15:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC).

Invitation to the December Wikification Drive

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:22, 2 December 2011 (UTC).

List of Tallest Residential Buildings in the World

There is an ongoing discussion on the talk page of this article between me and User:Longwayround. And there is a need of third party opinion, the discussion is over the following subjects:

• Reliable sources, the user User:Longwayround, claims the sources (CTBUH, Skyscraperpage, and Emporis) are not reliable and he says that there is a need of more secondary and tertiary sources.
• Topped out status of Princess tower. (As per Emporis the toweris topped out, but elsewhere it is mentioned as under construction)
• Grammar of the article.
• Ranking of the buildings.

Your opinion over the discussion at the talk page of List of Tallest Residential Buildings in the World will be highly appreciated.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 13:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Renewable energy in India

Hi Extra999! A new editor User:Virenkainth from India wishes to contribute to the coverage of renewable energy in India and the Renewable energy portal. He is asking for guidance from more experienced editors. So I thought I just drop you a note, maybe you can also give him some guidance. Cheers, --Elekhh (talk) 02:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Award

		The Guestbook Barnstar
		This user has signed my guestbook. You too can get this barnstar if you sign my guestbook. Solar Police►Talk

And...

Would you mind updating Wikipedia_talk:Random#Pattern with what you've learned, and maybe the link to the archive discussion? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 01:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

I have no idea about the link from where I learnt. Nor I remeber after being inactive for some a time. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 17:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Qxz-ad2.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Qxz-ad2.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Test cricket records

Hello and thanks for completing the section that I added. I had missed that IND/WI game in the UK news. Must have been a cracker at the end - all 4 results possible with 2 balls left. Ptelford (talk) 08:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome, it went alive till every moment, though I was disappointed that India did not win. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 08:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your message on my talk. I don't know of a 4th case of winning a Test after following on. The 4th match in the link you posted was an English County Championship match, so it wouldn't belong on the Test records page. Ptelford (talk) 15:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I did not notice that --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 16:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ryan ten Doeschate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2011 World Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Wide (cricket), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ODI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Graphs/Requests

Hi Extra999, thanks for preparing the requests page, it looks good. I have made some adjustments and included both versions of the graphs I have uploaded - others can choose to use the 10 innings moving average or the career average, I don't mind. One thing, can you make the requests template box align to the left, so that the navigation box fits with it. I moved it up so that the extra graphs displayed nicely and shrank the box to 80% but it is still centred so the display doesn't look good. Thanks. EdChem (talk) 12:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Extra999, thanks for this image of the Cricket Star. I think you were looking for the code for the barnstar, which is {{subst:Cricket Star|message ~~~~}}, just FYI. I do appreciate what you've done at WP:CRIC/GR and also in posting the star. Thanks.  :) EdChem (talk) 15:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for that :) I id look for that code but never got it, so I posted the image down under. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 17:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Earlsheaton Technology College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Cricket graph for Ian Bell

Hi Extra999, I've uploaded batting graphs for Ian Bell, as requested. As you'll see at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Graphs/Requests#Ian Bell, I uploaded two versions (with different vertical scales) of the graph with the career batting average. Since Bell's test average was at one point 297 runs (!) I was unsure of what would be most appropriate to the article, so I am leaving it to you to choose what to add to the Bell article. I am going to leave doing the Indian cricketers you have requested until after the final match in the India-Australia series in a few days time, if that's OK with you. Regards, EdChem (talk) 13:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

I have replied at the requests page. And it is very Ok for the Indian criceteres issue. Cheers :) --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 16:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Archiving

Hi Extra999... I agree that archiving at WP:CRIC/GR is necessary, but this seems a bit soon to me, especially as the Michael Clarke graphs were only put on the page earlier today, and the ODI graphs only uploaded today. Thoughts? EdChem (talk) 11:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I think you are right. I had the Clarke's graph doubt, but that was overtaken by the thought that it is building up too much. But with your comments I have reverted it back. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 11:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I think 14 days after closure is reasonable - what do you think? I was thinking I'd archive Dhoni on the 25th and establish a style, if that's ok. Do you think the archive should be ordered chronologically, or alphabetically, or alphabetically by country, or ...? EdChem (talk) 12:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I was thinking of a time period, and 14 days is juct apt. And chronologically would be the best, though I wanted to ask if there is a way to search a player's name, and get the results. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 12:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm thinking about it. I may hold off until I see if I'm going to need to do combined graphs (two lines) and I may as well update Dhoni's graph at the end of the series. EdChem (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

I was thinking of holding on Dhoni's archiving, and add his ODI graph. What do you think :) --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 14:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

As you may have noticed from my talk page, life has got in the way of WP editing lately, and will probably be an issue for a little while, but I will get back to the graphs as I have the time. Regards, EdChem (talk) 10:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry for you, --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 12:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Quick question

Hi Extra999, if you have a look here you'll see that in the table of ODI results by country the flag for the Ireland entry is missing. Any idea what's wrong and how to fix it? Thanks. EdChem (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

After doing a bit of research myself: Template talk:Cr I found out this, but I am in utter confusion still :) --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 14:18, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done In cricket, it works by adding IRE and not IRL, I found this by seeing the stats of Ian Bell. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 14:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks... that's weird but at least it works! :) EdChem (talk) 10:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

It is the flag of Ireland cricket team, not Ireland. That works, --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 12:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks very much for the Portal barnstar. — Cirt (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 02:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Northern_Carmine_Bee-eater_(2nd_nom)#Northern_Carmine_Bee-eater_.282nd_nom.29

Hi, I'm not convinced that this nomination was closed properly. I count enough supportive votes for promotion. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Best regards O.J. (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC).

I have replied at the nom page. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me) 08:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at Vyom25's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/M82 set

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:M82 HST ACS 2006-14-a-large web.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 11:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for an unsolicited offer of assistance and a warm welcome.

Best Wishes

AnkhMorpork (talk) 20:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome :) --Extra999 (talk) 11:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Jute

Why are you being obstinate about it? The article is about the fiber. You do not eat the fiber.

Consensus was reached. I invited you to participate in the discussion, but you didn't. Continuing to add a food section to an article about the fiber is tendentious. I have added a hatnote, transferred the relevant information, added page redirects for the non-fiber names of the plant. Done everything to make it as clear as possible that that page is about the fiber. Nothing else needs to be done.

Trust the reader for once. I assure you, most of them are not stupid enough to confuse an article that starts with "this article is about the fiber" with the plant itself.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 15:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

I said fiber six times! -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 15:43, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Agreeing with your rationale, now so I will not add the food section, secondly why are reverting when I add jute trade in the See Also (don't say that we can only add only about fiber in the section :!). --Extra999 (talk) 08:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

You actually said fiber seven times! --Extra999 (talk) 08:15, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not too concerned about the placement of that really. I just thought it might be better in the text, but feel free to place it elsewhere.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 12:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Portal introductions

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Portal#Introductions.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:29, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Portal Barnstar
		The Portal Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who have made significant contributions to topic portals. Thanks for working to improve Wikipedia's Portals. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:30, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Thxx. I will reply to your talkback at sometime. Again thanks, --Extra999 (talk) 04:51, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards.
Message added 20:21, 21 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

mabdul 20:21, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge

Hi Extra999, thanks for supporting Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Merge, the WikiProject has now been started. You can add yourself to the list of participants if you would still like to join. Thanks again, Quasihuman | Talk 20:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

X!

Mind? The only thing I'm bothered about is that X! has retired. I'm grateful for your tweak. --Dweller (talk) 14:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Like greetings! e^xtra999 (talk) 14:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

<a href=http://www.cheapjordansneakers.net/>cheap jordan sneakers</a> are cheap and nice,come and have a look!

http://zoompost.info/story.php?id=155486 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189079 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189081 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189083 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189084 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189085 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189086 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189088 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189089 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189090 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189091 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189094 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189095 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189096 http://worthystuff.info/story.php?id=189097 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.61.83.218 (talk) 03:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. 01:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 01:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at Mabeenot's talk page.
Message added 16:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mabeenot (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC) Hello. You have a new message at Benzband's talk page.

Request for permission!

Can I use your Google search in my user page? --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 02:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes, why not. Besides, I do not deserve the credit for this, its adapted from User:Cindamuse/Googs. e^xtra999 (talk) 13:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Common Lime Mating

Hello:

The nomination http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates#Common_Lime_Mating requires additional opinion from you. So, please - Jkadavoor (talk) 06:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

For awarding me with the barnstar; I'm glad my works are not going unnoticed. Thanks! Dipankan says.. ("Be bold and edit!") 15:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

स्वागतम! e^xtra999 (talk) 15:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Planretire

Template:Planretire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Chemistry Barnstar

Template:The Chemistry Barnstar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. mabdul 06:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

A Dreamliner for you!

	The "From Jet City, with WikiLove" Award
	Thanks for the barnstar, Extra! It made my week. I saw that you were a 747 fan, so here's one of Boeing's latest flying machines for you. Not my picture, but I did witness this flight! Although I almost missed it due to Seattle's trademark cloud cover. Enjoy! - J-Mo Talk to Me Email Me 00:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome! Thanks, e^xtra999 (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 20:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sarah (talk) 20:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Extra999 sandbox

Harro dere, me completed update stats of Dougie Bollinger, Ryan Harris. Will do Nathan Lyon after Windies test series finishes save doing two edits. Looked up Tremlett's Cricinfo stats, someone's already done it!Will do the rest very shortly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celebi12 (talk • contribs) 13:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for that :) e^xtra999 (talk) 10:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

(",)

Hello. 99.181.142.152 (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello too, :) e^xtra999 (talk) 06:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. When you recently edited Arthur Carr (cricketer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mickleham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for the welcome message Harsh 2580 (talk) 20:35, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. e^xtra999 (talk) 09:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

RE: A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks! If you need something else cleared there feel free to give me a poke about it. — foxj 07:54, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome. e^xtra999 (talk) 08:49, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at WhatamIdoing's talk page.
Message added 14:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WhatamIdoing (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Terminal and non-terminal functions

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Terminal and non-terminal functions, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Non-terminal function. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 08:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

The involved articles were in process of merger. Thank you. e^xtra999 (talk) 08:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Nice job

Adding useful boxes to Wikipedia:Wikipedians. I hope you can add even more information (and sources) to that page! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 22:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks really! Although, there is a ongoing discussion at User talk:WhatamIdoing, who added the first box of such. Anyways thanks. e^xtra999 (talk) 08:29, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks a lot for the barnstar. Very much appreciated :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:55, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. extra999 (talk) 09:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at Benzband's talk page.

Request for help concerning energy...

Hi,

I noticed you listed yourself as a participant of the Energy WikiProject.

There are 2 new outlines in this area that attempt to consolidate Wikipedia's coverage of their respective subjects, gathering and organizing the articles about them into one place and including descriptions for convenience. The purposes of these outlines are to make it easier for readers to survey or review a whole subject, and to choose from Wikipedia's many articles about it.

The new energy outlines are:

• Outline of solar energy
• Outline of wind energy

Please take a look at them, and....

if you spot missing topics, add them in.

if you can, improve the descriptions.

add missing descriptions.

show parent-offspring relationships (with indents).

fix errors.

For more information about the format and functions of outlines, see Wikipedia:Outlines.

Building outlines of existing material (such as Wikipedia) is called "reverse outlining". Reverse outlines are useful as a revision tool, for identifying gaps in coverage and for spotting poor structuring.

Revising a work with multiple articles (such as Wikipedia) is a little different than revising a paper. But the general principles are the same...

As you develop these outlines, you may notice things about the articles they organize. Like what topics are not adequately covered, better ways to structure and present the material, awkward titles, articles that need splitting, article sections lacking {{Main}} links, etc.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Outlines.

Thank you. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 00:46, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

P.S.: see also Outline of energy

Re

Cheers on the coffee benzband (talk) 08:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

extra999 (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

{{TB}} benzband (talk) 13:50, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

{{TB}} ~ again (sorry for the late reply as my internet connection has been down) :P benzband (talk) 18:03, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Enough of the TBs, you would probably have noticed that I have watched your talk from a long... time :P extra999 (talk) 16:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Indeed (^_____^) benzband (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

And I realize, you have been watching my talk as well :) extra999 (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Extra999. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Indian Premier League centuries/archive1.
Message added 15:53, 9 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 15:53, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Image description

Village in bihar

Do you have a description for this image ? please update if you can --DℬigXray 15:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

In response to mail. I am sorry I cannot release personal info, Please respect my Anonimity, thanks --DℬigXray 15:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)