User talk:Falcon007

Falcon007 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hi — Welcome to my talk page — Please leave any messages below

If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page to avoid fragmenting the discussion.
If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will be watching it, so you're most welcome to reply there rather than here.
If appropriate, I will move talk from here to the relevant article's talk page, so that everyone can share in the discussion.
If you want to start a new discussion thread, please start it at the bottom of the page. Better still, use the "+" tab next to the "edit this page" tab, which will do that automatically.

Welcome!

Hello, Falcon007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , (from an Australian),Blnguyen 07:16, 17 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

We don't need works in URDU

99.99% of the readers of this encyclopedia do not read Urdu. The link is completely useless. Furthermore, those of us who do not read Urdu can't even begin to judge the relevance or worth of the material you are so anxious to include. It is not prejudice to exclude your link. If you think I have some anti-Urdu bias, then go read the talk page for Rajput and see the Hindutva folk scream invective at me. Zora 07:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iqbal

Iqbal may be very dear to you, but it is not right to quote one poet at length and ignore the hundreds of poets, from dozens of other countries, who have written lyrics in praise of Muhammad. That is exalting Pakistan and Pakistan's poet above other countries and it is not fair or just. Zora 07:55, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saeed Rashid

No problem :-). Let me know if there's anything I can help you with.--Alhutch 08:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

I'm afraid I'm not quite sure what you mean. The article has not yet been deleted has it? could you link to the page you are talking about. thanks,--Alhutch 09:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now. I moved it from the India category to the Pakistan category on that Wikiproject. It was just a matter of removing the link from the one category page and pasting it into the other one. looks to be all set now. let me know if there's anything else I can do.--Alhutch 10:06, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The vote on whether or not to keep the article will stay up for 7 days from when it was first listed. that's our policy as outlined on this page. I just voted keep, and it appears that the article will be kept, so I don't think there's anything to worry about. thanks, --Alhutch 04:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poetry article

You are determinined to post that Iqbal poetry, aren't you?

There is a place to post longer texts -- Wikisource. There might also be copyright problems. Isn't Iqbal still in copyright? That could be a problem for any English translations. Zora 03:50, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use for research purposes could be argued to cover short citations, Falcon, but perhaps not whole poems. The poems would be public domain if published before 1925, at least in the U.S. However, any English translations might have their own copyrights, as translations. Zora 11:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was careful to say that this applies to whole poems only. Are you citing bits of longer poems? In any case, you need to give references, so that readers can check the accuracy of our transcriptions. Zora 11:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One could indeed argue that he ISN'T the greatest poet and philosopher. That's your belief, not a fact accepted by all people. Suppose I think that Fazlur Rahman is the greatest philosopher?

Aagh. You seem to think that anyone who denies the supremacy of Iqbal is denying "fact", like denying the roundness of the earth. Judgments re the worth or value of something are inherently subjective; they can't be FACTS. It's as if you said, "The best food in the world is tandoori chicken; that's a fact", and insisted that anyone who liked saag paneer was denying "fact". Zora 15:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsin-ul-Mulk

I enjoyed reading your article. Well written. Please keep up your good work with contributions. -- Samir ∙ ^T_C 08:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Ata Ullah Shah Bukhari to Attaullah shah bukhari at Saeed Rashid page

I reverted it. It was in wrong cat. --Spasage 08:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani poets

Two more Pakistani poets have come up for deletion - Naz Khialvi and Kashif Latif. If you are interested in AfDs related to Pakistan, it may be useful to keep Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India in the watch list. Tintin (talk) 07:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India, we try to cover the whole of the Indian subcontinent because people who read this page usually also knows about Pakistan, Bangladesh etc. So please let the Pakistan related links stay in that page and only *copy and not move* it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.

At the moment, nobody maintains (and I assume reads) Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan, so it would be a good thing if someone takes the initiative. Thanks, Tintin (talk) 13:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks. Don't worry. You message could be interpreted in two ways, so I'll address both. We all work for the betterment of the project and the issue of nationality doesn't come into it (maybe a little for some very controversial topics, but certainly not for the kind of articles that appears for deletion). I can also assure you that while there are some 'deletionist wikipedians' (people who vote delete if they don't know the subject instead of abstaining from voting), but I don't know of any regular voter from this part of the world who is one.

There is nothing like a wrong place as anyone can read anything anywhere and AfD entries are already listed in various pages like Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2006_February_23 and User:Dragons_flight/AFD_summary. Placing in Deletionsorting/India actually helps the case of a genuine article because it is likely to get valid comments than if it is not. Tintin (talk) 13:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 25% for major edits and 14% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Movement

I have created cat 'Pakistan movement' as per your suggestion. I think now we dont need 'Independence movement of Pakistan'. We can move articles from 'Independence movement of Pakistan' to 'Pakistan movement'. --Spasage 09:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3 revert rule warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.. Consider it your final warning. Thanks. --Ragib 21:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this is in reference to your continuous reverts to Pakistan. --Ragib 21:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you disregarding it yourself? We can place it in RfC and see what other people say. --Falcon007 21:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't. Check the history of the Pakistan page. Thanks. --Ragib 21:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the category of Former British Colonies to the United States article. To be fair I think we should add them to all former colonies. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For me this category is simiply a waste of resources. --Falcon007 22:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might help some readers to know which ones are former colonies of Britain. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand. Yes Pakistan itself was never a British colony. Have you discussed this on the talk page. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is already in the discussion, moreover I am blocked from editing while others are not for the same offense. --Falcon007 22:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, In case you are referring to me, I didn't revert the article more than 3 times in the last 24 hours. In fact, my last edit before these reverts was in March 3. I also gave you a 3RR warning in due time, just so that you can't claim ignorance of it. I also added the same to others who violated 3RR. Thanks. --Ragib 22:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have better things to do then to be a snitch. How could I even think to talk about you, you were the Holy Administrator. --Falcon007 22:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even the guilty have previlages to atleast present their opinion. Here I see myself just watching people commenting on the issue on administartive forums and unable to defend myself in leaving the comments. Strange ... --Falcon007 22:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also remind you that No personal attacks is another wikipedia policy, and calling others names won't do you any favor. I suggest you calm down, and would return to editings once your block is over. Thanks. --Ragib 23:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~I am done with you Ragib, don't want to discuss anyting further with you. Thanks --Falcon007 23:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]

A note of regret

This is in reference to our above mentioned unfortunate discussion which took place a few days ago regarding a small category. I have reviewed myself and think that there were few things which were totally inappropriate on my part to say. I really regret saying them. I admire your contribution to different topics, and hope that we forget that misunderstaning and have no hard feelings, Thanks --Falcon007 13:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR violation

Hi, you violated WP:3RR at Pakistan. I have blocked you for 24 hours. Please feel free to return after your block expires, but take your differences to the talk page instead of engaging in pointless revert warring. Cheers, —Ruud 22:12, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it would have been much better if you would have read the discussion first --Falcon007 22:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care who is right or wrong here, all that matters is that you violated 3RR. —Ruud 22:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, in the same spirit of self righteousness, check who else has done the same. --Falcon007 22:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan: A British colony?

No country by the name of Pakistan existed before 14th August, 1947. As a nation we have never been a colony of anyone. The case is different with other countries which claimed independence but were still under occupation. If people insist on this category why not they make a category Former Japanese colonies and include China in it. I simply disagree with this on the principle that such categories should not be on the main page. If some one still insists, he can make a list and inculde it in the history sections. I am sure if the same trend continues everyone would be a colony of everyone else. Is this fair? --Falcon007 23:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Books by Muhammad Iqbal

You are doing great job in bring Iqbal's work to the readers of wikipedia. You have recently added new cat Books by Muhammad Iqbal. Keeping in view Iqbals's naming convention, name should be Books by Iqbal. What you think? --Spasage 06:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I actually tried to follow the convention at Philosophers. Its perfectly fine with me but I suggest that if possible we should give it a little time. Thanks --Falcon007 06:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry it was Philosophy books --Falcon007 06:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with you, lets change it. --Falcon007 06:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: A matter of regret

Hi, The feeling is mutual. I looked into your extensive work on Iqbal, and you are doing a very good job. Disagreements occur, and people do things at the spur of the moment, but lets leave those things behind us. Keep up your good work. I wish you all the best. Thanks. --Ragib 15:37, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and Best of Luck to you too --Falcon007 15:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aligarh

You are adding some universities in Aligarh. What is the link between unis and Aligarh? --Spasage 06:41, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thaught it would be nice to see them as a part of legacy of Sir Syed. Category Aligarh would be a general cat for Aligarh University, movement, alumni, and some institutions. --Falcon007 06:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Qayyum Khan

Please note that the postage stamp is for Sir Sahibzada Abdul Qayyum (1866 - December 4, 1937) who served briefly as the first Chief Minister of the NWFP and should not be confused with Abdul Qayyum Khan (1901 - 1981) who was Chief Minister from 1947 - 1953. The two are not even related, though the constituencies they represented in the legislative assemblies are the same, separated by a time lag of 30 years! Sahibzada Qayyum was from Kotha in Swabi, while Qayyum Khan was of Kashmiri origin and lived mostly in Peshawar. Please note that the postage stamp also says Sahibzada Qayyum.

I am writing an article on Sahibzada Sahib, so please feel free to add the stamp image to that page.

Zain Sadullah

AOA, Thanks for this, it was certainly a mistake. Now the pic is in Pakistani public domain photographs when you finish the article it can be linked from this list. Please for the reference there is a good site Sir Sahibzada Abdul Qayyum at Pioneers of freedom having also some information. Thanks again --Falcon007 11:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Iqbal

It wasn't clear to me why you thought that the new version was an improvement, but it included a number of changes from good wikilinks to bad (see, for example, the links to languages; there's no article English, as you changed [[English language|English]] to). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:46, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikiethics

Hi,

We started a proposal Wikipedia:Wikiethics to state the existing policies coherently and make suggestions on improving the editorial standards in Wiki. I thought you might be interested in contributing to that proposal.

Unfortunately, a pro-porn and pro-offense lobby is trying to make this proposal a failure. They unilaterally started an approval poll although almost no one including me believe that it is time for a vote, simply because the policy is not ready. It is not even written completely.

Editors who thinks that the policy needs to be improved rather than killed by an unfair poll at the beginning of the proposal, started another poll ('Do we really need a poll at this stage?') at the same time. The poll is vandalized for a while but it is stable now. A NO vote on this ('Do we really need a poll now?') poll will strengthen the position of the editors who are willing to improve the ethics policy further.

If you have concerns about the ethics and editorial standards in Wiki, please visit the page Wikipedia:Wikiethics with your suggestions on the policy. We have two subpages: Arguments and Sections. You might want to consider reviewing these pages as well...

Thanks in advance. Resid Gulerdem 21:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, Actually I am relatively a new user and have so far restricted myself to some pages. It would certainly recquire some time to cosider the policy matters of Wikipedia. I will hopefully look into it and see what can we do. Thanks --Falcon007 22:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kaaba1.jpg

I have read the license terms at http://www.toursaudiarabia.com/images/kaaba-4.html. They are very clear: the image is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Sharealike license version 2.0. This is not a license that allows use on Wikipedia: images uploaded to Wikipedia after May 19, 2005 must permit commercial use. --Carnildo 22:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its fine but it would have been much appropriate if you would have replaced the pic with a fair one, than merely concentrating on deleting the images and related material. --Falcon007 22:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Normally when removing an image from a userbox, I replace it with a free image or an appropriate letter, but in this case, I don't know what letter to use, and I don't know of any free images that wouldn't result in a death sentence from conservative Islamic clerics. --Carnildo 22:30, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SALAM ALAIKUM

TO START WRITING IN URDU IS VERY EASEY ON WINDOWS COMPUTER. YOU JUST NEED TO FOLLOW THE GIDELINES ON THIS PAGE OF MICROSOFT, GUIDLINES FOR URDU SETUP . IF YOU HAVE WINDOWS XP, YOU NEED NOTHING TO DO BUT JUST ENABLE YOUR COMPUTER FOR RIGHT-TO-LEFT LANGUAGES. IF YOU HAVE WINDOWS 200 THEN YOU JUST HAVE TO DOWNLOAD TWO FILES GIVEN ON THE ABOVE LINK OF MICROSOFT AND THEN FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE PAGE. WASSALAAM. [AFRAZ]

Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Pakistan

I have started History of Pakistan project. It combines all the events which occured before partition. As you are working in this area, join this project and encourage others to do the same. You can also contribute in article Karachi, which is good article nominee. --Spasage 06:22, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and nice work ... I wish I could be as active as I used to but currently I am little pressed for time. Hopefully I would try to contribute as much as possible. Thanks --Falcon007 20:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need your Help

I need support in editing the page for Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh from Pakistani-Wikipedians. The page concludes Pakistans link to 9/11 using information from Indian press and much information in that page is without proper references. The page says that ISI gives money to Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh and Sheikh then wired the money to Atta. I have checked some of the references on that page and information in the references is different from what is mentioned in it. I will appreciate any help because I have very less free time these days... Faisal 16:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for mentioning this, actually I hardly come to wikipedia these days due to time constraints. --Falcon007 20:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pakistan-related topics

Hello. Could you help in populating List of Pakistan-related topics. Thanks. Pepsidrinka 23:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will hopefully try to do what I can, I am actually taking a break from wikipedia due to time constraints. --Falcon007 20:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hindi-Urdu controversy of 1876

First of all I have renamed the page, and secondly, I am aghast by your style of writing--this is not the way to write an article, and thirdly, please don't write naïvish articles. You write things only half-half, with partial info and create disastrous articles, spreading misinformation. Cygnus_hansa 13:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The renaming was unnecessary as it happened in 1867 and not in 1876. Secondly, I only created this article and posted info from an existing article, as the origional article Sir Syed was becoming too long, and so that more things could be added. I even didn't alter the last sentence which was obviously offensive to me. Anyway, I have now provided some additional citations for refference and fixed the article name. --Falcon007 20:49, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

Salam. Your article, Altaf Husain, was an utter and total plagiarism. I have removed the article, and put one line. If you choose to re-write the article, please do so.--Le Grey Intellectual 16:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: I've found another plagiarism, Mohsin-ul-Mulk. How many articles have you plagiarised? This is simply disgusting.--Le Grey Intellectual 16:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT 2: Yet another plagiarism, Viqar-ul-Mulk. Agh. I am editing all the plagiarisms you have posted in order to make them proper articles. --Le Grey Intellectual 16:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its good to see a fine journalist in making, who is already harassing people :-). Anyway, let me try to remove some of your concerns. In any piece of knowledge its not considered plagiarism to add excepts, and give relevent citations. If this would have been the case no education was possible as people would be terrified to mention any info. When I add some article I usually try to add citations if it has an except from another article and this conforms to the norm. Fot Altaf Husain article I did present the referrence. Similarly, I mentioned in links the referrences for the last two articles you talked about. These were some of the earliest of articles I added and I put them as templates to be worked on. I hope you would excuse me from the criminal charges. Thanks for mentioning this to me, and I wish you best of luck for your studies and future profession. --Falcon007 21:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the article Altaf Husain again. Falcon, you cannot cpoy something from womehere and post it here, whether you provide the link of not. It cannot be original work, but it cannot be copied eitherYou're meant totake the information, and rewrite it in your own words. --Le Grey Intellectual 13:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jinnah PR

Hi Falcon007 - I need your help and advice in making Muhammad Ali Jinnah an FA. Please join the Wikipedia:Peer review/Muhammad Ali Jinnah/archive1. Rama's Arrow 17:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and good to see this work in progress. I wish I could spend some time here on wikipedia these days but its difficult due to few things. I would hopefully contribute as much as possible. Thanks again. --Falcon007 20:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I Need your help

I know you have very less time these days but still I am posting this. See... The concept of Muslim being brother (all for one, one for all) is not a new concept. We being Muslims believe in Khilafat, the concept created by Muhammad (PBUH) and that concept was not created in 1900 as described in the articles with names Pan-Islamism and Muslim Unity. I wish if you can help in doing major modification in Pan-Islamism and Muslim Unity articles. I do not know that what the need of these articles is when a good article of Khilafat already exists. I will really appreciate you help. --- Faisal 21:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Falcon007,

I was wondering if you have seen the following page, its a place where alot of people work as a team to progress and work together on articles and images of Wikipedia.

The Pakistani community for sometime has been very dormant, as there were not many people here to write articles related to Pakistan. If you go the following "Project page" you will see a new community has been formed, where I think alot of us should asign tasks and work more as a community than individually. Here's the link;

Wikipedia:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics. Do take a look at all the other communities the way they are working to improve articles and promote their communities.

I think its about time we all do the same. As you may notice everthing is just been laid out, so now its our turn to fill the gaps. Do pass the word on to other Pakistanis and people working on Pakistani articles.

Many thanks, Fast track 08 May 2006 (UTC)

great stuff

keep up the good work --digitalSurgeon 23:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Falcon007 00:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

India

What do you think of India since your Pakistani? Eiyuu Kou 20:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think of India all the best and hope that this region would provide an example to the world community of peace and progress. --Falcon007 00:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Javed Iqbal (serial killer)

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Javed Iqbal (serial killer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Javed Iqbal (serial killer). You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 22:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think its worth deletion :) --Falcon007 07:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your post on my talk page

Thanks for posting on my talk page. I noticed, by using VP, you removed one of the comments on this talk page. I only needed to revert one edit, not two, but VP reverts all of them by default. I agree that the other user you mentioned on my talk page should not have removed his own comment, and I've reverted that and posted a warning (3RR). Cheers. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 03:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. --Falcon007 03:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to share a small conversation which I had on User talk:FeloniousMonk page:

It appears to be a commercial site; links were spammed to a dozen or so articles. It's iffy as an external link - looks like someone using Wikipedia to make money. Guettarda 21:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added these "Video Library" links as I found this site to be the best free online video resource on intelligent design. Its free and non-commercial. I don't see any reason for their deletion. I have included them again and excpect that we respect each other's contribution. --Falcon007 00:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, I don't see any video or media resource links on main wikipedia intelligent design sites which would organize these resources for both sides. Being an economist I occasionaly add media links to different sites and have never seen any problem. --Falcon007 01:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And after that all my edits were deleted. --Falcon007 04:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Falcon. This is regarding this user talk page User talk:Guettarda. According to Chacor, the message you added (the section) 'Not a playground' was considered trolling. I haven't checked your edits yet, and I won't say your edits are right or wrong until I've checked them properly, but this has lead to a dispute because of my mistake of using the {{3RR}} warning, which was somehow considered insulting, and I hope to settle this dispute soon. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 05:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the above mentioned reference I have already given you an idea what was the cause. You can follow the link and see the discussion. After that he posted his comment titled 'Spamming', which I consider outrageous. He has already deleted my links, and I was consdering this matter over but then he deleted my comments on his talk page. Please follow the talk above to see whats going on. I find it simply unexceptable if he put comments on my page and delete on his. --Falcon007 05:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have checked your contributions. I think you're right to say the links are not commercial, but I think what it means it that it still doesn't make it appropriate to use them. I understand that this is quite frustrating to have your links deleted and a post on here saying you're spamming, but Wikipedia does have a policy on external links. Perhaps it just appears to look commercial. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 06:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am myself not a new wikipedia user and I am fully aware of its policies. These links were by no means 'commercial'. And when I write comments why didn't he first respond to me before deleting them. Then he accused me of Spamming. I have repeatidly said that I don't want to continue this discussion. He has already deleted my links and I didn't even want to put them back. But deleing the conversation from his talk page is simiply not acceptable. Anyway, I think its over. Some people assume that some sites are their own and no one has the right to do anything on it. Its not a mature behavior. --Falcon007 06:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're new enough, and I question your knowledge of policies. In any case, and site that prominently states "PURCHASE HERE", no matter what lame excuse Falcon gives for the inclusion of that message, is clearly commercial. Jim62sch 09:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to waste it on blogs, for me this matter is over. Think and do as you like. --Falcon007 13:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

invitation

you are invited to join Category:Mohajir Wikipedians .Madman 0014 06:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Tamgha i Jurat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tamgha i Jurat.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: A small request

Well it's better, but please look at the fairly new Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline, there are still a few points your rationale should be adressing.

As for images sourced from various free hosting sites that is not rely very helpfull. The source is supposed to tell us who the copyright holder is. Just pointing to some random website that happens to host is doesn't rely do that. Doesn't hurt to say that it was found on some Geocities or Tripod site naturaly, but we need to know who actualy created it in the first place (and preverably also when, especialy if claiming PD due to age). --Sherool (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ... --Falcon007 18:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nishan-e-Haider.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nishan-e-Haider.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:SSG Pakistan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SSG Pakistan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 12:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Ottoman language Wikipedia

Hello Falcon007

I am a history teacher from Istanbul, in Turkey. We need your vote [1] for opening Ottoman Language wikipedia

--Tarih 21:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bro. I have voted. --Falcon007 08:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your vote.

--Tarih 18:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Captain Karnal Sher Khan.jpg

Hello, Falcon007. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Captain Karnal Sher Khan.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Captain Muhammad Sarwar.jpg

Hello, Falcon007. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Captain Muhammad Sarwar.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Havaldar Lalak Jan.jpg

Hello, Falcon007. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Havaldar Lalak Jan.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jawan Sawar Muhammad Hussain.jpg

Hello, Falcon007. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Jawan Sawar Muhammad Hussain.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lance Naik Muhammad Mahfuz.jpg

Hello, Falcon007. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Lance Naik Muhammad Mahfuz.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 17:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Major Muhammad Akram.jpg

Hello, Falcon007. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Major Muhammad Akram.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Major Raja Aziz Bhatti.jpg

Hello, Falcon007. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Major Raja Aziz Bhatti.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Major Tufail Muhammad.jpg

Hello, Falcon007. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Major Tufail Muhammad.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pilot Officer Rashid Minhas.jpg

Hello Falcon007, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Pilot Officer Rashid Minhas.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Saeed Rashid.jpg

Hello Falcon007, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Saeed Rashid.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Falcon007/gallery. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of video lectures on business

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of video lectures on business, by Reywas92 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of video lectures on business fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

a rather irrelevant list only linking to external sites.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of video lectures on business, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate List of video lectures on business itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Is_there_an_Islamic_problem.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Is_there_an_Islamic_problem.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bleh999 17:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Studies

Can we please have your opinion on the talkpage of the article? Thanks.-Vmrgrsergr 21:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:A Q Khan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A Q Khan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. effeietsanders 09:14, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ihsan_Danish1.jpg

I have tagged Image:Ihsan_Danish1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 06:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urdu wikipedia

Hi Falcon007! I was just moving around on Urdu wikipedia pages when I saw your Urdu page and from that page I am here on your English page. You put a line on your page about the Urdu fonts in your computer, so, are you finished with urdu setup in your computer? if there is anything I can help please let me know. Samarqandi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lensicon (talk • contribs) 11:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Hilal_i_Jurat.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Hilal_i_Jurat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nishan-i-Haider.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nishan-i-Haider.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 19:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sitara_e_Jurat.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sitara_e_Jurat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tamgha_i_Jurat.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tamgha_i_Jurat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:M M Alam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:M M Alam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mirza Book.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mirza Book.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Iqbal Reconstruction.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Iqbal Reconstruction.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Suleri.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Suleri.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Prophet Bio1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Prophet Bio1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AR_Akhtar.jpg

I have tagged Image:AR_Akhtar.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Labbaik.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Labbaik.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 14:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ShahabNama.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ShahabNama.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wizardman 03:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zinda_Rood.jpg

I have tagged Image:Zinda_Rood.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AlakhNagri.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlakhNagri.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Altaf Husain.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Altaf Husain.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sarfaraz Ahmed Rafiqui.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sarfaraz Ahmed Rafiqui.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Urdu Wikipedia

Dear friend,

You seem to be an active Wikipedian from Pakistan. We have an Urdu Wikipedia that needs all the help that it can get. Currently, we do not have many active users and we will really appreciate if you would consider becoming an active contributor. As you are already familiar with Wikipedia's style and rules, your presence would also help elevate the overall content quality.

Hope to see you soon at Urdu Wikipedia

Regards,
Kashif Aqeel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.223.190.189 (talk) 04:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Major Muhammad Akram.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Major Muhammad Akram.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lance Naik Muhammad Mahfuz.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lance Naik Muhammad Mahfuz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pilot Officer Rashid Minhas.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pilot Officer Rashid Minhas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Major Raja Aziz Bhatti.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Major Raja Aziz Bhatti.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Major Tufail Muhammad.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Major Tufail Muhammad.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Captain Muhammad Sarwar.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Captain Muhammad Sarwar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Captain Karnal Sher Khan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Captain Karnal Sher Khan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Falcon007! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 16 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Javid Iqbal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:FC College alumni

Orphaned non-free image File:Major Shabbir Sharif.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Major Shabbir Sharif.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KAQKhan.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:KAQKhan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Labbaik.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Labbaik.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sir Ziauddin.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Sir Ziauddin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Iqbal with Javid.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Iqbal with Javid.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Iqbal Final.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Iqbal Final.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hasrat.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Hasrat.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Falcon007}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Brother (book) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Brother (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Brother (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:07, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AlakhNagri.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AlakhNagri.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Wasif.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wasif.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:QAShahab.JPG needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:QAShahab.JPG appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Falcon007}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ross1.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Ross1.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Falcon007}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iqbal terms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iqbal terms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal terms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Timeline of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's life

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Timeline of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's life requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Facts, not fiction (talk) 20:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ross Masood

The article Ross Masood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Facts, not fiction (talk) 20:28, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Iqbal bibliography for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Iqbal bibliography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Iqbal bibliography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Facts, not fiction (talk) 14:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yousaf Saleem Chishti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yousaf Saleem Chishti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yousaf Saleem Chishti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Facts, not fiction (talk) 14:17, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Join us at FB

Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:

Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
Page: Pakistani Wikipedians

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ^{( T - C - G )} 12:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ross1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ross1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:QAShahab.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:QAShahab.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Abdullah Sahib.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Abdullah Sahib.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tariq Ismail Sagar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tariq Ismail Sagar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 05:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kirdar Saz

The article Kirdar Saz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 08:00, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Iqbal Academy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Iqbal Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.allamaiqbal.com/org/iqbalacd/readmore.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 08:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jahan-i-Danish

The article Jahan-i-Danish has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 08:09, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aligarh Movement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aligarh Movement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://aligarhmovement.com/book/export/html/189. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 08:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamaliaat Quran e Hakeem Ki Roshani Mai

The article Jamaliaat Quran e Hakeem Ki Roshani Mai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 08:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mukhtar Masood

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mukhtar Masood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.urduyouthforum.orgwww.urduyouthforum.org/biography/biography-Mukhtar-Masood.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 08:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahmad Rafique Akhtar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ahmad Rafique Akhtar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 08:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timeline of Muhammad Iqbal's life

The article Timeline of Muhammad Iqbal's life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Anything that is not already in his article can (if appropriate) be put in his article ... no need for this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 08:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iqbal Cyber Library

The article Iqbal Cyber Library has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN library.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 08:38, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aligarh Movement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aligarh Movement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://aligarhmovement.com/book/export/html/1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 00:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aligarh Movement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aligarh Movement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.studymode.com/course-notes/Aligarh-Movement-Paper-1345692.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 06:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan

Hi Falcon007!

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk
Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan[reply]

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive

Hi Falcon007!

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July.
Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

Better source request for File:Thomas Arnold.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Thomas Arnold.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:08, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ishtiaq Ahmad (fiction writer)

The article Ishtiaq Ahmad (fiction writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:GNG and WP:Notability (people), the subject has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. Significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail. There are no any reliable sources that support the notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justice007 (talk) 12:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Aligarh

Template:Aligarh has been nominated for merging with Template:Aligarh Muslim University. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saeed Rashid.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saeed Rashid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naseer Ahmad Nasir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naseer Ahmad Nasir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseer Ahmad Nasir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 15:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iqbal Cyber Library for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iqbal Cyber Library is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal Cyber Library until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 15:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paighambar e Azam O Aakhir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paighambar e Azam O Aakhir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paighambar e Azam O Aakhir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suheyl Umar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suheyl Umar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suheyl Umar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 11:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pakistani bureaucrats has been nominated for discussion

Category:Pakistani bureaucrats, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Thomas Arnold.jpg

The file File:Thomas Arnold.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of Tamgha-i-Jurat has been nominated for listification

Category:Recipients of Tamgha-i-Jurat has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Life in the OIC

Template:Life in the OIC has been nominated for merging with Template:Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]