User talk:Fatwatunpetunvi

April 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Abdul Qadir Gilani, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 02:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia articles must not take religious beliefs or interpretations as fact or as the only belief/interpretation. DMacks (talk) 03:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

which articles Fatwatunpetunvi (talk) 03:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is extremely academically dishonest on your part, you reverted the Dar Qutni article. The information on that article is misinformation clarified by the original source of Ibn-e-Taymiyya himself. It does NOT say "Daraqutni used to mention the unreliable hadiths in his Sunan, so that he and the other scholars can make it clear that those Hadiths are unreliable" this is non-existent ref both on Kitabuun (the source you took from) and no reference is given on the wikipedia page. This is extremely deceptive and fixing this is not interpretation. Putting the quote of Ibn-e-Taymiyyah is not an intepretation.

my source is the following article which DID put a reference, https://whiteminaret.org/signs-of-messiah/sign-of-the-eclipses/#Ibn_Taymiyyah

you are circulating false information, This is not a violation of Wikiepedia, it is a correction of a misconception. Fatwatunpetunvi (talk) 03:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sunan al-Daraqutni, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. This is an example of the problem: making an interpretation of the text rather than simply stating the text as if the interpretation is on equal strength as the text itself. And here, once someone opposes an edit, you must not simply redo your edit, but instead it is upon you to start a discussion on the article talkpage and get consensus for your edit. DMacks (talk) 13:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wdym concencus for my edit Fatwatunpetunvi (talk) 14:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CONSENSUS. DMacks (talk) 03:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]