User talk:Felsir

Welcome!

Hello, Felsir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
How to edit a page and write a great article
The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
The handy Manual of Style
And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango 123 14:17, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page. :)

In this case, you should be bold and add the {{Merge}} tag to the top of the cleft palate and cleft lip articles. Then, post an argument in favor of the merging on both the articles' talk pages; some of the information you added here was very convincing. Please see Template:Merge for what the tag looks like. Oh, and please also check what links to the Merge template to view examples of how the tag is used. If you need further assistance, please don't hesitate to bug me. :) Sango 123 14:17, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

Well done! That was quick. Sango 123 17:20, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

Oosterscheldekering

Hi, nice work on the article! I only noticed after my second edit or so that you had written it all by yourself. I hope you didn't mind my comment re: 'could use copyediting by a native speaker', that was absolutely not meant in a negative way! --JoanneB 12:00, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No offence taken! In fact, I'm happy that you corrected my mistakes - all the better for the quality of the article. Thanks Felsir 12:04, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

Craniofacial Team

I've moved this to Craniofacial team and corrected the double redirect on Cleft but left your user page alone. Cheers.
brenneman ^(t)^(c) 00:42, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Frits Philips

Hi, in the article Frits Philips the cleanup-verify tag was added. I do understand the reason for this, however I have a few questions about it. I am born in Eindhoven, much of the information is from the local newspaper. Since Frits was very popular his 100th birthday -and his recent death many articles were printed in the paper "Eindhovens Dagblad"[1]. I tried to add as many checkable sources with ISBN numbers. What is needed to give the article 'verified' status? What sections need verification or a source citation? Felsir 08:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As a general rule of thumb, it is good to have at least two independent sources cited within every article on Wikipedia. This assists other editors by allowing them to verify the accuracy of the text and allow them to expand the article further as well. What you did was perfect, so I've gone ahead and removed the cleanup-verify tag. Best regards, Hall Monitor 17:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mandyhaberman.jpg

Hello. Please explain why this image was released in the public domain. Thanks. --Edcolins 13:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I e-mailed Mandy Haberman for details on her biography. She pointed me at the imagebank downloadable at her site[2]. I asked her if it was useable and she told me that the images at the imagebank were available for everyone as long as used unaltered and within the right context. So I figured, if it is free for download and use, it's public domain. The Haberman feeder image is from the same imagebank. Felsir 14:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Contd on Image talk:Mandyhaberman.jpg. --Edcolins 16:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CleftLip3.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CleftLip3.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Longhair 03:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. Since I made the image myself I added the PD-self template. Felsir 07:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VWN en WCN

Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org . Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, effeietsanders 13:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Cleft

I thought you would be interested in the latest post (at the bottom of that page) about renaming.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 22:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Felsir 23:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Habermanfeeder.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Habermanfeeder.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Sherool (talk) 13:31, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since my son's nutricion depends on a Habermanfeeder, I'll take a picture of the bottle I have at home. I assumed a publicly available press-kit image (which is subject to a fair use policy) supplied by Mandy Haberman herself would classify as a valid image for Wikipedia. I fail to see why an image I took myself would be better than one supplied for the purpose to show what a Haberman feeder bottle looks like. BTW. this has been subject for discussion before (see [3]) Felsir 13:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a cross-section schematic how the bottle works and a picture of my son being fed with a Haberman Feeder bottle. Felsir 09:50, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Wapenstoedenrode.png, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 16:42, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Media Molecule, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tikiwont 10:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible downgrading of A1 GP WikiProject to Taskforce status

Several users have started a conversation at WP:MOTOR about the possible downgrading of the A1 GP WikiProject to taskforce staus. I have notified you because your name is on the A1 GP Members list. The discussion is ongoing, and is located here. Davnel03 18:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SpecialForces box.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SpecialForces box.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. 17Drew (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SVG

If your request on the graphics lab is completed, could you add {{resolved}} to the top of the section (Above the images)? This way we know everything is done and that it can be archived to help keep the page clear for new requests. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see the resolved tagg has been added. Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of the procedure. Felsir (talk) 07:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UrRu

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article UrRu, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UrSkeks

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article UrSkeks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User: IMPORTANT WIKI ARCADE GAMES PROJECT NOTICE

As you should be aware the wiki arcade games project has been marked inactive and with good reason. I am trying to increase the activity of this project but first I need to know who is still actually interested. So to find out I have put inactive next to the name of every person who has put them selves down as a participant of the project. If for whatever reason you do not intend to participate in the project anymore please remove your name from the participant list altogether. If you do but not in the near future leaving inactive next to your username will be helpful. Not taking any action at all will of course lead to inactive remaining against your name on the participant list. If however you have every intention on continuing in participating in the project please come change the "inactive" next to your username to "ACTIVE" so that it is clear who does and who does not still have interest in participating in the project. Thankyou for your time. --Hybrid360 (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Oosterscheldedam.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Oosterscheldedam.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Formula Smiles Foundation

A tag has been placed on Formula Smiles Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nuttah (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marlies Dekkers

Frank, I also love her brand and I wouldn't be beyond writing such words of praise in another context, but really, this article doesn't even come close to NPOV. I don't really want to decimate it or delete it entirely, but I think if it isn't improved then that is the logical conclusion. What do we do about it? Just wanted to touch base with you before taking an initiative on the page itself. If up to me, I could only delete things as I don't have too much to add. Cheers, Fbunny (talk) 14:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I basically translated stuff from the dutch Wikipedia page on Marlies Dekkers. As you might have seen, my edits only limited to sticking with facts and NPOV as much as possible. See [4] for my edits. So I agree with you that we should stick to the NPOV as much as possible. I'll remove some of the content and add a NPOV tag to the page as well. Felsir (talk) 14:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sculpt 4D

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sculpt 4D, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable sofware

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 22:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sculpt 4D

I have nominated Sculpt 4D, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sculpt 4D. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 17:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Game deck

The article Game deck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citations. The article describes 'game deck' as a generic term, but searching indicates that it is unique to Nokia. At best this ought to be a redirect.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AJCham2097 (talk) 23:06, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Felsir! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Brian Menell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tony Teixeira - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Marlies Dekkers - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Radikalbikers.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Radikalbikers.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Microform (disambiguation)

The article Microform (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page has only one item and is unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 67.188.230.128 (talk) 04:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I removed one entry from the page, see the edit summary of this diff. 67.188.230.128 (talk) 04:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radikal Bikers

The article Radikal Bikers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this is a notable game. The unsourced "spirtual successor" claim to a notable game is not sufficient.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mirabeau logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mirabeau logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Themed Entertainment Association

The article Themed Entertainment Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; every citation is to its own awards ceremonies

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garden Party (board game)

The article Garden Party (board game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)'s section for products requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Take on You

The article Take on You has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

he coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mandy Haberman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mandy Haberman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandy Haberman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Steve M (talk) 21:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Take on You for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Take on You is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take on You until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Dolby Cinema.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Dolby Cinema.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pharyngeal flap procedures1.gif

The file File:Pharyngeal flap procedures1.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Pharyngeal flap procedures1.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pharyngeal flap procedures2.gif

The file File:Pharyngeal flap procedures2.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Pharyngeal flap procedures2.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Game deck" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Game deck has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22 § Game deck until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]