User talk:Fishsicles

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tetrapropylammonium has been accepted

Tetrapropylammonium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for PrMgBr

A great source of references for procedures is Org Syn.: free, online, top quality, and meets WP:SECONDARY (super-important goal for references). doi 10.15227/orgsyn.006.0054 gives generic alkylmag bromide prep. Your draft redlinks to isopropylmagnesium bromide. "No one" uses that. The dominant reagent is isopropylmagnesium chloride (cheaper, better equiv wt) as can be confirmed by Org. Syn. also.--Smokefoot (talk) 22:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've mostly seen iPrMgCl as as the isopropyl equivalent in my own reading, but I'm not quite confident in understanding which Grignards use Cl vs Br predominantly; is it a question of the carbon-halogen bond strength during synthesis? Intuitively that would suggest that -MgCl Grignards are more energy-intensive to produce than -MgBr, but I'm sure there's factors in the finer details that I'm completely oblivious to. Either way, it's one of those things where my sense of "notability" wasn't sure which one to do; thanks for the tip. I've rephrased it to instead link to the chloride, as I think some note of (minimal) isomerism is still "worth having". Fishsicles (talk) 01:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

well everyone would use chlorides if they could because chlorides are way, way cheaper than bromides. Anyway, iPrMgCl is a commercial transmetalation reagent. Use a Grignard to make a Grignard. You do what you want, but iPrMgCl is more notable as you can verify by Googling or CAS search. Best wishes, --Smokefoot (talk) 02:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fishsicles/sandbox

Your article Sodium tetrapropylborate has been made into an article now by Graeme Bartlett and thus, your sandbox is now completely redundant. Thus i am telling you to completely blank and remove all the contents of your sandbox now and make it an empty sandbox and also remove all corruption it now itself. 117.196.145.52 (talk) 12:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sandbox was the original version of the draft; I hadn't blanked because I wasn't starting on anything new recently, and assumed that since it was my sandbox, nobody else would really be paying attention to it?

I wasn't aware users could submit other users' sandboxes. Fishsicles (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just got notifications about this again. It has been several months. You are block evading just to tell me to blank my sandbox, a page which should be no one's business but mine unless I'm actively submitting a draft, and moreover has already been blanked and repurposed for another draft and has been for - I reiterate - months. Please think about your priorities. Fishsicles (talk) 14:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. 117.252.158.50 (talk) 15:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Fishsicles! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alkylidene group has been accepted

Alkylidene group, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pygos (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]