User talk:FlyersPh9

Thank you for experimenting with the page Central Dauphin High School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Nlu (talk) 13:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Central Dauphin High School. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Lupin|talk|popups 18:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Headhunterz has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/djheadhunterz (matching the regex rule \bfacebook\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

InspectTech

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of InspectTech, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.inspecttech.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of InspectTech

A tag has been placed on InspectTech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Safiel (talk) 00:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:'Harlem Shake, Postmortem of a Video Craze' Infographic.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:'Harlem Shake, Postmortem of a Video Craze' Infographic.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ho Tuan Kiet (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:'Harlem Shake, Postmortem of a Video Craze' Infographic.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:'Harlem Shake, Postmortem of a Video Craze' Infographic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ho Tuan Kiet (talk) 10:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Harlem Shake, Postmortem of a Video Craze' Infographic.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:'Harlem Shake, Postmortem of a Video Craze' Infographic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 07:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]