User talk:FreedomJoe

Before coming in to start a conversation, please be mindful of civility and that other people have different opinions.FreedomJoe (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Conversation 1

Your edits so far have all been from dubious/biased sources and are written to clearly push an agenda (which is compounded by your user description, cringy as it is). Please be more neutral on future subjects and provide credible and trusted sites as your sources.

Please sign into a Wiki account before lecturing anyone of what is neutral or not neutral.FreedomJoe (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

You Do realize that people can have opinions on your work without having accounts themselves, you don't need to deflect criticism because you don't have an effective rebuttal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.109.94.7 (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

And when someone comes in without an Wikipedia account, there is always a question regarding that person's motives. There are always other references which can be garnered. Just deleting the posts shows your own bias, just because you don't like the messaging. So don't try to deflect your own shortcomings.FreedomJoe (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

If you would care to notice you latest edit of that remains, as it has a decent source, so please don't play hot potato and act the victim. Clearly as shown if I or another person were to delete your edit and offer a solution you can come back and rectify it, as you did. 185.109.94.7 (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Seconded for clear agenda pushing. Fouriels (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

First of all you just removed some of the posts wholesale. You don't have a wiki account and you come here all high and might with your lecture. I have reinstated the addition/post because it was unjustly removed. This is in the news, nothing to do with agenda. So you can take your faux NPOV disguise and bugger off.FreedomJoe (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

This new account by FreedomJoe, created a week ago, is just the latest sockpuppet of some banned user - why bother addressing him - he will create another troll account next week ... --2600:8800:FF0E:1200:AD51:B4EE:9659:A29C (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Oh and if you are not sure that this is a sock - please look at the lovely edit war he has begun here after just one week on wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2018_March_23&action=history --2600:8800:FF0E:1200:AD51:B4EE:9659:A29C (talk) 11:41, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

And who are you? You don't even bother to post with a Wiki account. Pot calling a kettle black. Better bugger off to whatever hole you came from.FreedomJoe (talk) 11:41, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

" ... bugger ... ?" - is that the best potty mouth we can get from this sock?--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:AD51:B4EE:9659:A29C (talk) 11:48, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Oh, and as for anon ips - you sure look a lot like 89.240.142.115 --2600:8800:FF0E:1200:AD51:B4EE:9659:A29C (talk) 11:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

That's the kindest word I can offer you since you don't even afford to post with a Wiki account. That's sarcasm for you.FreedomJoe (talk) 11:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

and again, yawn ... you sure about anon ips since again - you sure look a lot like 89.240.142.115--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:AD51:B4EE:9659:A29C (talk) 11:55, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Gimme a break with your yawns. Just post with a proper Wiki account and stop with your moralising.FreedomJoe (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Agenda pushing accusations

For those of you who come up with faux accusations, just take your blinkers off and read the references that I have added. If you don't have a wiki account, please show evidence of your last 100 posts before pointing fingers of agenda pushing.FreedomJoe (talk) 18:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 89.240.132.177 (talk) 17:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)