User talk:Frvernchanezzz

Greetings

Stop removing cited sources of prominent athropologists in the field, in this case a famous University London professor. This article does not focus to prove anything towards serbs? this article is merely informative. Ancient Land of Bosoni (talk)

No problem, we had a missunderstandment only. Ancient Land of Bosoni (talk) 06:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome & reply

Welcome!

Hello, Frvernchanezzz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Well yeah, it might seem a bit POV, because for instance, Bosniaks aren't any more Illyrians than Croats are (who have historical-cultural links far more, because of the Illyrian movement). --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 11:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bosniaks

Thanks for taking the time to contribute to the discussions in Talk:Bosniaks. However, I hope you aren't offended by my reminding you to please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Bosniaks is a controversial article with often heated discussions. It's best to closely follow talk page guidelines and keep a cool head even when you think others are not.

Comments such as "Learn to read" [1] are especially troublesome. Would you consider removing or otherwise changing? I'm concerned that it reads as accusatory and only aggravates the situation. --Ronz (talk) 16:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Please don't add questions to talk pages that do not pertain to article improvment. In any case MGS4 hasn't come out so no one can answer that question. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 07:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Croats

But the same senseless overflowing I have successfully repulsed at the Serbs article. Why should we apply it for the Croats article? The Serbian Unity Congress claims quite overfetched estimates regarding the Serb population - and hence they're not used in Wikipedia. Is it really sensible to in that way include the Croatian World Congress estimate regarding Croat population, one that seems even more fetchy? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Petrol/Gasoline

Hello. I noticed your revert [2] of my edit. I think "petrol" should come before "gasoline" because there have been arguments in the past over whether or not the article should be "petrol" or "gasoline". I think it's a fitting compromise to have petrol mentioned first, since the article is at gasoline. But I won't change it back if you object, because I don't really care - I just stumbled across it one day when reading WP:LAME or something. Have a nice day! Frvernchanezzz (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's customary to list the term used as the article's title first. Such style should be applied irrespective of which English variety that term belongs to. (We do the same thing for articles that use Commonwealth English terms as their titles.) —David Levy 21:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Eight-days-ps3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Eight-days-ps3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:15, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your post on MGS4

Saw nicholaidaedalus' post in the third archive. Someone in a previous MGS4 talk archive also said a bit about 360 people disappearing from the FFXIII boards when it was mentioned that the game will be only on the PS3. thanks for putting it up, and I just hope the rumors will die a slow death. Eaglestorm (talk) 01:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nice

I don't know why, but this revert and your edit summary just cracked me up. Keep up the good work bro. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 19:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong

You're right, I was. I see that now, I missed the PS1 tag in front of it. ~QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 10:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blond(e)

Oh, I'm sorry. It's not about English or American; according to blond, "blond" is masculine and "blonde" is feminine.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 14:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm neither American nor British, I am an English speaker who happens to be of neither demographics. I've enough experience in Wikipedia to say that there's no such thing as a Wikipedia "rule"; it's more of a policy, and these two differ, you know. If you've understood my edit summary, which is as subtle a rationale can get, Wikipedia itself addressed blond without the "e". But case is closed and I'm not about to enter arguments as needless as a "spelling preference". Cheers ^_^! — Bl ue 。 02:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: VGChartz

Hi there! Personally, I don't like VGChartz because their numbers cannot be demonstrated to be true. However, I am one of those who tend to think their numbers can be used if cited by a reliable source. The WikiProject, however, thinks they are not reliable at all, and I accept consensus. I have seen VGChartz being quoted by a Forbes article, and in a press release by Codemasters I think. As I explained in the WikiProject time ago, the main problem I see with VGChartz being considered a reliable source is that people will just replace all the numbers from the list of best-selling games, referenced by a variety of sources ranging from consumerist to industrial sites with VGChartz numbers making these pages, which I think they are some of the best referenced in Wikipedia, in just mirrors of VGChartz sales list. That would downgrade our quality just too much to even be considered.

I already knew they were using VGChartz back in December. However, they appear to be using Magic Box as well (and probably Wikipedia). -- ReyBrujo (talk) 11:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bosniaks

Greetings. I've noticed you are one of the editors who has edited the Bosniaks article. I was wondering if you would have any input into a few "revert wars" happening lately over there. Here's a diff. Personally, I think the changes are biased, a little racist/xenophobic, but mostly, they are wrong.

P.S, I've sent this message to a few of the users I've seen in the talk page history to try to get a discussion started. 121.222.199.140 (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About WageSlave

Thanks for starting the RfC. You have no doubt been doing a favor for everyone involved with the XBox 360 debacle for the past year, and hopefully, this will get resolved A.S.A.P. on very likely terms considering his history. Dibol (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

His response to this will probably be the same as when anyone questions his edits. wp:pa. Also, I havnt finished reading the RFC but in this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Grid_Wars&diff=206810630&oldid=185341920

he changed a quote to remove mention of Microsoft, I found this edit quite odd. John .n-IRL 14:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

While I agree 100% with you regarding the anonymous vandal at Bosniaks, comments like this [3] are completely out of line and violate WP:NPA. Yes, the user is disruptive and in the wrong, but that does not justify comments of that kind. JdeJ (talk) 10:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert rule

You appear to have made some reverts lately on Bosniaks. Please be aware that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts on a single page within a 24 hour period. If you continue reverting, you risk being blocked from editing. Rather than reverting edits, please consider using the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. The dispute resolution processes may also help. Stifle (talk) 11:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LA Noire

Regarding your edit;

"restored to the neutral version, you know, the accurate one" http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=L.A._Noire&diff=207071295&oldid=206844561

The edits you removed are well cited, accurate, relevant and verifiable.

If you doubt the edits, please read this article: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/rockstar-confirms-episodic-gta-content-360-only

You'll find that it is included in-line 4 times to correctly cite the article.

Please read the article. Best Regards.

Wageslave (talk) 22:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing in the middle of a paragraph

Please go back to the RFC page and remove your edits from between my paragraphs. Please add your comments below my paragraphs, as the manner you're doing it now makes my own commentary absolutely unreadable. Thank-you.

Wageslave (talk) 00:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's easier to read the way I put it. I responded to each line, and it would be harder to follow if they weren't like that. On the other hand, you should go to the actual RFC page, and right a response in the "Response" section, which is where you are meant to respond. And it doesn't need to be signed as the one section of diffs and evidence was written by the one user, but you went ahead and edited after each line - the very thing you're now complaining about. I, at least, indented and italicized my writing.

And you need to write a response in this section of the real RFC, not on your personal user page. Thanks. Frvernchanezzz (talk) 08:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please go here for my response. 16:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi frvernchanezzz, was just wondering would it be possible to mark your edits as separate on the RFC(if that can actually be done somehow...I relalise they are in italics but since this is an RFC about Wageslave, it may be polite to allow him to request this), Wageslave obviously feels his response is being lost among the many indents and new sentences. I personally feel it is becoming hard to read the original RFC considering the current state of the page. Also, should Wageslaves user page just be copied directly to the RFC, since the two have little in common now? John .n-IRL 16:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC) Replied at my page. John .n-IRL 05:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk subpage

Hi, now I'm just asking you because I knew you had one, but how do you make subpages for your talk page? I can't figure it out! =[ — Emil K. ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I found out myself. ^^ — Emil K. ^{(talk|contribs)} 19:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quote

"When you start accusing everyone of being in on a conspiracy, you shouldn't be surprised if they decide to confirm your paranoia by banding together against you."

"Just because your paranoid Don't mean they are not after you" - Kurt Cobain. --8bitJake (talk) 21:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: PS3 sales

I'll leave the sales figures as it is. Happy editing! --Silver Edge (talk) 08:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

I wouldn't be to worried about the RfC closing, Wageslave appears to have takena break from editing and hopefully when he comes back he'll take the discussion into account. If not, then we have a platform to proceed further. John .n-IRL 16:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eight-days-ps3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Eight-days-ps3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Frvernchanezzz/Wageslave case

Your page User:Frvernchanezzz/Wageslave case ends with "Categories: Wikipedia help templates" which leads to mis-categorization. Please remove it. -- davidz (talk) 01:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CAN YOU MAKE ME SOME TEMPLATES ?

that I've visited as traveler Lettonia, Slovakia, Albania, Scotland, Netherlands, Portugal, Bulgaria. thanks mate IslandShader (talk) 22:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome templates

Hi,

Please substitute welcome templates by placing "subst:" in front of the name of the template, as in

{{subst:welcome}}

This copies the source code of the template to the userpage rather than just loading it remotely on rendering. That way, when the user edits their talkpage, it isn't so obvious that the message was canned :P Thanks! --King Öomie 03:27, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]