Jump to content

User talk:Gamaliel/Archive 26

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20←Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26

Wikidata weekly summary #183

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Highlights of 3 years of Wikidata by Madgalena Wiegner

Some thoughts re GamerGate

I'm going to leave an identical comment for both HJ and Gamaliel on their respective talk pages.

You've both been doing yeoman's work in the GamerGate topic area, and I thank you for that. I have regularly looked in on the activities there (but not participated), and I think that you've each made many good decisions on many occasions; however on the whole, it's been the two of you most of the time dealing with much of this, at least for quite a while, and it's clear this particular case has become quite a burden for both of you. An occasional other admin will pop in here and there when something's blatant, but that's not quite the same thing, I know. So...thank you for your work in this very contentious area. On the other hand...emails? It's probably not the best way to handle arbitration enforcement, since other admins can't back you up or point out that there's something you may have overlooked. I know there aren't a lot of admins willing to work on AE - it can be corrosive - and I know this is a pretty esoteric topic area anymore. In fact, it's at risk of becoming something of a walled garden, with the same editors working on the same articles and carrying the same arguments back and forth, and unfortunately only a few admin eyes keeping watch. There have been times when I thought the solution that would be best for the project would be to kick everyone off the topic area with the hope of drawing in fresh perspectives, but my years on Arbcom have taught me that there's a very low success rate for those types of interventions. I've encouraged DHeyward to step away from the topic area, and I'd probably encourage a few other editors to do the same. To be honest, I wouldn't blame either of you if you said "okay, out of here for good this time" and remove the primary combatants (and I use the word advisedly). I don't think either of you made particularly outrageous administrator decisions in this specific episode - although if you're going to delete something to enforce AE sanctions, you do need to be explicit about that - and I hope that both of you will continue with your work on arbitration enforcement, although it may do you both good to take a break from this particular topic area. It's not like there is a dearth of disputes to work on. Once again, thanks for your work in a difficult and challenging area. Risker (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

@Risker: Thank you for your message. I think we need to hear more of this on Wikipedia; we are quick to be vocal when we have complaints, but when things go well, there are a lot of silent unseen nods of agreement. I'm trying to spread myself around a little more on AE and not focus solely on GG, but people keep bringing their complaints directly to me for a variety of reasons. Email has been effective in trying to squelch loud public conflicts, but it does create a host of side issues I didn't appreciate until know: the lack of transparent, the fact that it looks suspicious to third parties, and the fact that neither DHeyward or MarkBernstein can see how much effort I've made to keep both of them from each other's throats and from being blocked. I fear this unblock has undercut efforts to make DHeyward play nice with other editors. If he keeps down this path, a topic ban is inevitable. His friends would do well to encourage him to moderate his behavior, as I've been encouraging both of them to do behind the scenes. But I think it's time for someone else to try to find a resolution to this feud. Gamaliel (talk) 22:12, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia Highlights from October 2015

Here are the highlights from the Wikimedia blog in October 2015.
About · Subscribe/unsubscribe, 20:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello again

Hi there, I believe we met in person at Wikiconference USA after my talk on Afrocrowd and that you gave me your card. I am happy to discuss collaboration with the Signpost. Let me know what you had in mind.

Best, ---Aliceba (talk) 23:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

FLRC

I have nominated List of cetaceans for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. sst✈discuss 18:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

VimpelCom pays millions for text from Wikipedia

(Potentially material for In the Media)

A corruption investigation is ongoing regarding VimpelCom Ltd., which allegedly paid some 30 million dollar to Talikant Ltd., a firm owned by Gulnara Karimova, a controversial daughter of Uzbekistan's president Islom Karimov, for two reports largely consisting of text ripped from Wikipedia. The former CEO of VimpelCom was arrested last week in Norway. The case is mentioned in our VimpelCom article, but not the use of text from Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the only news sources I found are not in English. Here is a news article in Norwegian: http://www.dn.no/nyheter/naringsliv/2015/07/02/2147/Vimpelcom/betalte-30-mill-dollar-for-ren-avskrift; Google translate gives a good impression.  --Lambiam 22:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

note

I didn't remove email or talk page access. — Ched :  ?  20:40, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I thought this had happened based on Kevin Gorman's comment in the discussion. I have corrected my error. Gamaliel (talk) 20:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For a level-headed approach on ANI. GABHello! 01:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Hope you're doing ok.

Here's a cookie.

Hi. Saw your note about stepping away for a bit form your Editor-in-Chief gig, and wanted to say hope all is ok in your world. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #184

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for all the work you do getting the Signpost out each week. I hope those new recruits enable you to share the workload soon! Liz Read! Talk! 17:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Signpost inquiry

Hi, I've emailed you on a matter related to your election candidature. Tony (talk) 06:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your arb thoughts

You offered many good ideas in response to my questions, not always answering the questions but leading further. Your comment "If you are topic banned from something, you generally had to do a lot of work to get there." makes me ask if you perhaps happen to know what the "lot of work" was that made me topic banned. I only know that a case was requested because too many reverts of infoboxes happened (for example 1, 2), it was accepted and I kept arguing that way, but in the end those who had added infoboxes were restricted, not those (very few) who reverted. At that point, I lost all trust in arbcom, so much so that I didn't appeal. By now, major operas (all by Verdi and Wagner) have an infobox. The arbitrators had the idea to go article by article, another waste of time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

That comment "a lot of work" was not directed at you, but at the other topic ban case you were referring to. Gamaliel (talk) 17:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
I knew that, but I am still curious about my case, which I think is kafkaesque (and I worked on Kafka, the most successful TFA so far. Here you think you help Wikipedia, and wake up to find yourself restricted. "in ein ungeheures Ungeziefer verwandelt" - transformed to a monstrous bug - is the phrase in The Metamorphosis.) At times, laughing helps. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
If anyone wants another wall of text, see my reply to Gerda in June 2013. My comments at an ANI section pointed out that an editor has belligerently pushed infoboxes for years, and that has caused extreme distress to the group of excellent editors who have built and who maintain classical music articles. My point is that in a collaborative project it is not always possible to achieve perfection—it may be that infoboxes are wonderful, but as they are not compulsory the huge disruption caused by forcing them into articles is not worthwhile. @Gerda: Please stop pushing pushing pushing. Johnuniq (talk) 01:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanksgiving
Shout for joy
Did you know that you can opt out to see an infobox if you don't want to see one? I do what I think is good for our readers. You speak as if I was not part of this "group of excellent editors who have built and who maintain classical music articles". In 2015 I wrote two featured articles which appeared as TFA, and more good articles than I can count ;) - As I said, at times laughing helps. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Categorizing pages that can be transcluded

Hello. It was a good move to create the [[Category:Wikipedia_Arbitration_Committee_Elections_2015_candidate_questions]]. But when assigning the Questions pages to that category, it is better to protect the categorization by a pair of noinclude.../noinclude, since some people prefer to transclude these pages into only one great page in their userspace. I have changed that. Pldx1 (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing that. I didn't realize that people were transcluding those pages, thought it was just the statements. Gamaliel (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Not a prank?

[1] - Cwobeel (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

It's harmless, hilarious, and most importantly, accurate. Gamaliel (talk) 23:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
I think it is very amusing and doesn't detract from the article in any way. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
This is indeed hilarious, I am tempted to apply WP:IAR even though it doesn't quite apply. Kingsindian ♝♚ 04:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #185

Wikidata weekly summary #114

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Jim Sterling

Thanks for stepping up and helping to explain the BLP philosophy and policies on Wikipedia. I've been editing from a tablet and it is very difficult to write those long explainations. My hands thank you greatly :) Prodego talk 03:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nota bene vox populi

Any chance you could swing by the errors page and add an explanatory comment for the {{N.b.}} you added here, just so that other editors know what's up? No hurry, I'm sure, but when you have the time I would appreciate it. --Xover (talk) 18:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

@Xover: I removed it. I just added it as a reminded that I'd skipped over it back when it was part of the numerical group I was working on. Gamaliel (talk) 18:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rebel Heart Tour

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rebel Heart Tour. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #186

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

The New York Times

Hi, Gamaliel. Hope you are doing well! I am wondering if you have access to old issues (i.e. April 1968) of The New York Times. I can take this to Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request if you prefer. Thanks! - Location (talk) 23:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

I have access to the complete run of the New York Times. Let me know what you need. Gamaliel (talk) 02:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Cool! I am following up on this material. I've seen the article sourced in a book by Alfred McCoy as "S. M. Mustard, letter to Senator Ernest Greuning (March 9, 1968); The New York Times, April 19, 1968, p. 11." I don't know if McCoy, the NYT, or both spelled "Gruening" incorrectly. If McCoy is correct, the following quote also appears in the article: "Col. Ky took advantage of this situation to fly opium from Laos to Saigon." (The relevant names here are Ernest Gruening and Nguyễn Cao Kỳ/Nguyen Cao Ky.) Hope this helps. - Location (talk) 02:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Shoot me an email and I'll send you a PDF of page 11. There's an article about the allegations and a small article below it about denials of the allegations. Gamaliel (talk) 03:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
You've got mail! - Location (talk) 04:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Weird. Nothing yet. Gamaliel (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Hmmmm. I tried again. (I tried a third time, too, bypassing the Wikipedia e-mail function.) - Location (talk) 06:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Got it! Interesting that someone would cite this as a letter. Very helpful! Thanks again! - Location (talk) 17:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your opinion

Sorry to bother you, but could you tell me if Nancy Rubin Stuart should be considered a reliable source for the Castilian language and/or Isabella I of Castile? Shouldn't we be using historians for articles like Isabella I of Castile? --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Linguistics are not my area of expertise. WP:RSN would be the best place to ask. Gamaliel (talk) 01:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

How come something like this isn't revdeled?

This, on the talk page of a BLP with very high traffic. sst✈(discuss) 08:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-02-04/Gallery

С чиатю что Площадь Регистан не относится к этой статье прошу удалить, фото. И еще Регистан поменялся надо это учитывать. Сравните два фото File:Registan square.jpg --Bobyr (talk) 10:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Использование Google Переводчик : Почему вы думаете, что фотография Регистан не применяются к данной статье? В статье упоминается визит в Самарканд в середине 20-го века, так что старше фотография является актуальным и целесообразным. Gamaliel (talk) 19:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Хорошо допустим путем перевода я смогу понять смысл статьи, но вопрос идет о том, что здесь должно стоять новый вид Регистана, а не старый или какое либо другое фото. Раз вы отвергли мое фото - File:Registan square 2014.JPG то вот вам на выбор несколько новых видов File:Registan 2015.jpg, File:Mosque Bibi Khanum (5).JPG или File:Samarqand city sign.JPG. Жду ответа --Bobyr (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Я понимаю, что Регистан выглядит иначе сегодня. Но статья цитирует поэму о Регистан в 1932 году, так что старше фото уместно, потому что это ближе к, как он выглядел в 1932 году. Gamaliel (talk) 15:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Large revert without talk page?

Gamaliel, I would like to ask why you reverted my changes to the Southern Strategy article without a talk page discussion. WP:DONTREVERT suggests that we really should work to keep what is there. The material I added was widely sourced and largely from scholarship. I also addressed some of the issues with the article such as expressing material that has not been settled by scholarship in WP voice. I find this large scale reversal frustrating given the effort I went through to find scholarly sources (actual time in a research library). Anyway, I do trust that you are editing in good faith. You are polite and respectful even in disagreement. Could you help offer suggestions as to how to integrate the new material? Thanks Springee (talk) 15:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your edits were disputed by two other editors and they were under discussion, but you simply inserted them again. I realize you have made some small changes but I don't feel you've addressed the fundamental problems discussed on the talk page. I appreciate the work you are putting into this and your congenial discussion of these issues, but there's no hurry to get this material in the article. Gamaliel (talk) 18:22, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
I would ask that some time in the short term you put your objections on the talk page. Also, I think it is important to separate what you think are undue weight issues from some of the other edits. I agree that we were in discussions. I think it would have been better if Scoobydunk observed the same. Anyway, please let me know which parts you think are undue. Springee (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Gamaliel, given the harassment I'm getting from Scoobydunk I'm going to take some time off from the article. I'm not doing a good job of dealing with an editor who bludgeons every conversation (I'm not the only one who has experienced this) and the accusation of canvasing makes it really hard to AGF. Anyway, I would greatly appreciate it if you would give your feedback on the reverted edits at some point. I'm tired of the BS. Springee (talk) 07:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Please assume good faith and stop levying personal attacks.Scoobydunk (talk) 18:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

ygm

Hello, Gamaliel. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Gaijin42 (talk) 01:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #187

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

WLM winners now in articles

Hi Gamaleil,

I've just spent the afternoon making sure that all the top-10 photos in WLM this year are used in at least one article on en.wp - in some cases I've been able to put them in several articles. I noticed on their "global file usage" section on their individual Commons pages that the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-12-09/Gallery was the only en.wp page that linked to most of the (only the 1st and 10th had any pre-existing mainspace usage at all), so I thought I'd tell you about it - as the author of that signpost page.

  1. - now used in Aerial photography, Westerhever (pre existing usage), Westerheversand Lighthouse (pre existing usage)
  2. - now used in The Name of the Rose, Sacra di San Michele
  3. - now used in New Town Hall (Hanover)
  4. - now used in Olympic flame
  5. - now used in List of Buddhist temples in Thailand, Ficus in the subsection "Cultural and spiritual significance [of fig trees]" this is my favourite usage. Beautiful pic, but hard to use to illustrate something.
  6. - now used in Château de Chambord
  7. - now used in Opernpassage - I had to create this [very short] stub in order to use this image.
  8. - now used in Solovetsky Monastery
  9. - now used in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province
  10. - now used in Vakil Mosque, Mohammad Reza Domiri Ganji (pre existing usage)

Cheers, Wittylama 21:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikipediocracy

[2] Isn't this a bit much, not to mention tiresome? Nobody is claiming that forum members have a COI. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 13:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Also I just noticed two other WP:POINTy adds to the connected contributor template since you closed out the discussion, during which I specifically indicated that I knew of only one COI user, the site co-founder. So they know perfectly well that there is no great push to list anyone other than that one user, User:Alison, who is co-founder and has a clear and declared COI. If these people feel that the co-founder of a site who participates in RfCs and AfDs, and edits the mainspace, as well as the talk page in quite this drama-ish manner, is not subject to WP:COI, they should take it through channels. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 13:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

If they feel they have a COI, then there's no harm in them adding their names. Gamaliel (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
No, you can see from the edit history that the aim was to remove the template. They want to prevent the site founder from being identified in the standard manner. Simple WP:GAME.Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 04:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations (and you've got email)

Welcome to the 2016 Arbitration Committee. A few moments ago, you should have received an email from me asking you such simple questions as what email address you want to use for committee business. Welcome! Courcelles (talk) 19:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations and condolences

My best wishes on your election to the Arbitration Committee. Thanks for stepping up to try and make this place just a little bit better. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

  • Congratulations, Gamaliel! Although I don't know how you'll do admining, arbitration work and also the Signpost. I'm so glad you won a seat and I hope you find the work a worthwhile challenge. Liz Read! Talk! 20:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
:-) Smallbones(smalltalk) 21:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Congrats on your ArbCom victory! I wish you the best of luck. GABHello! 22:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

w00t!

Let me also offer my congratulations for your successful appointment to ArbCom. All the underhanded scheming, payments under the table to your legion of meatpuppets, nefarious stratagems and the influence of the mighty GamalielPAC donors obviously paid off! At long last, Wikipedia shall be exposed to the full force of your evil powers in a 12-month <reverb>reign of terror</reverb> that'll send shockwaves through the ages. The rivers shall run red with the blood of your enemies! Hail Hydra! -- Scjessey (talk) 03:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC) (in jest)

Books and Bytes - Issue 14

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Gale, Brill, plus Finnish and Farsi resources
  • Open Access Week recap, and DOIs, Wikipedia, and scholarly citations
  • Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref - a citation drive for librarians

Read the full newsletter

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Recreation of deleted page

I'm sorry, I do not remember the original article. Your new article looks fine to me. Gamaliel (talk) 20:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Congrats!

I'm not sure if I really should be congratulating you, but good luck in the coming year! I'm excited to see how this crop of candidates does.

Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)


Congratulations, amigo! I'm happy for you! --Rosiestep (talk) 03:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Joining the chorus. Congrats! - Cwobeel (talk) 22:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

The reward for good work is more work.

My condolences Congratulations! ForbiddenRocky (talk) 17:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


The Signpost: 09 December 2015

DYK nomination of Rachel Davis Harris

Hello! Your submission of Rachel Davis Harris at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #188

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Israel Meir Kagan

What's your opinion about the NYT obituary as source for the claim that Yisrael Meir Kagan wanted to become a high priest? I ask because the discussion may have put the question in a somewhat new light. --Jonund (talk) 13:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I commented there. Gamaliel (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Selection in Arbitration Committee

Hello Gamaliel, congratulations on your appointment to the WP:AC. I am sure that you will serve the committee to the best of your abilities. Keep up the good work. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Elisha Noyes Sill

Hi, I'm Magnolia677. Gamaliel, thanks for creating Elisha Noyes Sill!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add additional sources to this article, as well as sections.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

Ahmed Mohamed clock incident

Renew PC? --George Ho (talk) 21:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #189

Wikidata weekly summary #186

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Woodward Stearns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield Township, Pennsylvania. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's greetings

Hi Gamaliel, wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, with thanks for your support of women on Wikipedia in 2015, particularly that wonderful editorial. All the best, SarahSV (talk) 23:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed

You are receiving this message because you are a party or offered a preliminary statement and/or evidence in the Arbitration enforcement 2 case. This is a one-time message.

The Arbitration enforcement 2 arbitration case (t) (ev / t) (w / t) (pd / t) has been closed, and the following remedies have been enacted:

1.1) The Arbitration Committee confirms the sanctions imposed on Eric Corbett as a result of the Interactions at GGTF case, but mandates that all enforcement requests relating to them be filed at arbitration enforcement and be kept open for at least 24 hours.

3) For his breaches of the standards of conduct expected of editors and administrators, Black Kite is admonished.

6) The community is reminded that discretionary sanctions have been authorised for any page relating to or any edit about: (i) the Gender Gap Task Force; (ii) the gender disparity among Wikipedians; and (iii) any process or discussion relating to these topics, all broadly construed.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 02:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed


Merry Christmas and happy new year

Merry Christmas and happy new year. (:

--Pine✉

Season's Greetings

 Wishing you a Charlie Brown
Charlie Russell Christmas! 🎄
Best wishes for your Christmas
Is all you get from me
'Cause I ain't no Santa Claus
Don't own no Christmas tree.
But if wishes was health and money
I'd fill your buck-skin poke
Your doctor would go hungry
An' you never would be broke."
—C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1914.
Montanabw(talk)


Cruz cartoon controversy

My additions were not "unsourced." I corrected the article to accurately reflect the cited sources. For example, the vide only shows one daughter speaking, not both as your reversion inaccurately shows. As another example, the sourced quote from the cartoonist is inaccurately paraphrased. I am adding my corrections back.Jumping Jack Henry (talk) 05:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@Jumping Jack Henry: The statement you added " The cartoon was roundly criticized as offensive, inappropriate and racist. " is not supported by any source cited in the article. Gamaliel (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Signpost

Hey Gamaliel, I didn't know if you wanted to use anything from this in your Signpost article. It's something that us in the Chaneyverse research group put together about everything. It's not as detailed as Rhododendrite's main page, but I figured that an overall summary might be helpful. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #190

Wikidata weekly summary #186

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

DYK for Rachel Davis Harris

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

Please comment on Talk:2012 Sydney anti-Islam film protests

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2012 Sydney anti-Islam film protests. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Signpost Arbitration interview request

Excuse me. I am lead writer for the Signpost's "Arbitration Report" and am wondering if you would be interested in answering some interviews questions as a newly elected Arbitrator. The questions will be asked through email, unless answering them here would be a more suitable choice. GamerPro64 22:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Sure, email away. Gamaliel (talk) 22:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Gamaliel. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
So I was told there was an emailing issue I had using Yahoo so I'm wondering if you got my email. If not I'm going to have to resend. GamerPro64 00:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I didn't get it. Gamaliel (talk) 02:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
All right. I'll have to resend it to everyone then. GamerPro64 02:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Got it this time. Gamaliel (talk) 02:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

2016

Happy New Year 2016!
Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary blisters.
   – Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


Happy New Year 2016!
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Gamaliel!

Happy New Year!

Gamaliel,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Writing for the Signpost update

In August 2015, I contacted you about joining The Signpost. While you were happy for me to join, I decided I'd wait until I was more experienced. Since then, I've been regularly editing the wiki. I've now noticed that the 'WikiProject Report' has not been posted regularly recently, and I'm therefore wondering if I could write the report (on occasion or regularly). Thanks. Leeds United FC fan (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Sure! We'd be glad to have someone write the WikiProject Report. Our personnel coordinator Rosiestep can help you get started. Gamaliel (talk) 22:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Is it okay that I've chosen a WikiProject I'm a semi-active member of? There's no other requests and I'm quite familiar with the sport. Leeds United FC fan (talk) 10:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
As long as you disclose your involvement in the piece, I don't see a problem. Gamaliel (talk) 15:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
@Leeds United FC fan: hi there! I responded with lots of info on your takpage. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

Jason Cabinda

Thank you. There was a glitch/hiccup in the system and it was late enough that I was too tired to figure out how to fix it. Postcard Cathy (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase II/Clerking RfC

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase II/Clerking RfC. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #191

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Re:{{authority control}} biographies

Hi, just wanted to be considerate and let you know I've touched some of your biographies- John Turvill Adams and Elijah Frink Rockwell- because I thought it would be more in keeping with this wiki's house style if the content was rearranged into sections as I have done previously. Please do not interpret this as a grudge or warning or anything like that. Let me know if there is a rule preventing me from doing so. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 19:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

@Discuss-Dubious: Thank you for your note. It's not my personal style to break up very short articles into smaller sections, but I don't have any sense of ownership that leads me to object to others doing so. Feel free to improve them as you see fit. Gamaliel (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
When I thought about doing this back in August, I was worried there might be some kind of strange rule about modifying biographies that came from old or external minor encyclopedias. Good thing nothing's wrong with it. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 01:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Claims of Defamation Bowe Bergdahl

Your statement can not be correct and it only suggests possible close personal connection to the subject matter. This is completely relevant and accurate data, regardless of how it makes the subject person of the article look or feel. It was not written with malice. It is a fact that the allegiance of this individual is in question - he may have stated he wished to renounce citizenship. There are all kinds of articles on Wikipedia containing unpleasant things about people. What is important is that they are truthful, not that they make the subject of the article feel good. Ghooper22 (talk) 10:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

WP's 15th Birthday

I am curious to know how many of the editors who signed up in the early years are still contributing. Is this an idea for a future Signpost article? Or maybe the piece had already been published. I've been on the books 11+ years. Kind regards Apwoolrich (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

ACC tool access approved

Hi Gamaliel. Thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I verified that you are identified to the Wikimedia Foundation and approved your request.

Pending a tool root marking your account as identified in the tool database, you may now access the interface here. You may want to consult with checkusers who have recently been active in ACC because the drill to handle requests for an account is slightly different.

Please subscribe to the private ACC mailing list following the instructions on that page. You may also want to join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and you can get or give real-time advice on how to handle requests.

Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Welcome to the team, DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) WER 21:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:CouponDunia

Your removal of my edit to Draft:CouponDunia provided no summary and no information was left on the article talk page nor my talk page. Can you fill me in on why this was done?--RadioFan (talk) 05:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

In the media

Possible entry for the 'In the Media' section of The Signpost?--Wolbo (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #192

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Wiki edit-a-thon in March

Hi! Would you be interested in helping facilitate another event for Art+Feminism at University of Florida on March 6th? Martaleahsandler (talk) 20:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Sure! My calendar is clear that day but give me a bit to make sure there's nothing I've forgotten before I commit. Gamaliel (talk) 01:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

File:K Records logo.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:K Records logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Germany edit

In response to your deleteion here ([3]), this issue is currently under discussion at various forums and on the talk page. Don't delete it without addressing the issue on the talk page or the relevant forums. It's under review. -- Veggies (talk) 18:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


I have posted on the talk page. Gamaliel (talk) 18:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Ariel Fernandez

Dear Gamaliel, I am trying to avoid confronting some editors seemingly involved in a crusade against me. In the interest of neutrality and fair play, can you insert my sentence at the end of Career section in the BLP? As per your indications in Talk page, this sentence and its reference is allowed by Wikipedia policy. Thanks much. Ariel Fernandez.181.10.76.232 (talk) 14:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't feel it's appropriate to intervene in this content dispute at this time. I merely noted that policy did not prohibit the inclusion of that sentence. What does get included must be decided by the consensus of the editors on the talk page. I'm sorry you feel that these editors are "in a crusade" against you, but I see no indication of that. Please see one of our fundamental principles, assume good faith. I know, based on comments on that page, that you are in touch with OTRS via email. Those volunteers are best equipped to help you with this matter, and I suggest you seek their assistance and heed their advice. Gamaliel (talk) 14:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your attention and advise. Editor Bueller007 has made 70 (seventy) arbitrary changes yesterday to my BLP without seeking any consensus, while he fiercely refuses to add the sentence I requested in the interest of fairness and NPV. I would like to request that the 70 changes by Bueller are reversed until consensus is reached on the matter. I have asked the OTRS that my sentence be incorporated as per the policy that you cite in Talk page. Thanks again. Ariel Fernandez.186.138.183.140 (talk) 18:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Seventy changes cannot be reversed en masse without some evidence that those edits are against policy. The fact that he did not seek consensus does not make it a policy violation. Any editor can reverse those changes if they want to if the article is unprotected, but I'm not going to reverse them myself without evidence of violation. I would bring your concerns about those edits to the talk page of the article and focus on what is wrong with the content of those edits. Gamaliel (talk) 18:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Axisoffeeble.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Axisoffeeble.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

"Ouster"

This word ([4]) will be unfamiliar to readers outside North America. Why not 'removal' or 'expulsion'? Thanks Peter Damian (talk) 10:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Never mind. Peter Damian (talk) 15:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

Wikidata weekly summary #193

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Wikimedia Highlights from December 2015

Here are the highlights from the Wikimedia blog in December 2015.
About · Subscribe/unsubscribe, 22:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Removing inquiries from your talkpage and ADMINACCT

Re removal of the criticism of your admin action at AE on this page [7].

According to WP:ADMINACCT: "Administrators are expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions and to justify them when needed." So did you think that criticism was just trolling or personal attacks? Odd interpretation. Don't you think it's a good idea to wait for atleast a couple of admin comments before single-handedly closing the request of a case which clearly is very close to the original topic ban? --Pudeo' 22:33, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

ADMINACCT does not require me to respond promptly and civilly to uncivil attacks on my integrity. In regards to your question about waiting, I saw no point in allowing WP:AE to become another Gamergate battleground. Nobody was going to block him as precedent clearly has established a BLP exception for topic bans in general and his topic ban in particular, this article is not closely related to GG, and he didn't edit the article. His submission to AFD was not disruptive, having another GG war at AE would be. Gamaliel (talk) 22:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Affirmative. I still think there are cases where "being a BLP issue" can't be said for certain, there are borderline cases. For instance, someone being topic banned from a biographical topic could always claim to just uphold BLP and still continue to be involved in the topic. --Pudeo' 22:42, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Agreed. It's a judgement call. If NSB was actively editing the article (as opposed to removing obvious violations with a single edit), participating on the talk page, etc. then I think that would be potentially grounds for a block. Submitting articles to AFD or BLP, in my judgement, is a responsible exception to a topic ban. It potentially resolves the issue, or at least brings it to the attention to others, and a minimizes both potential disruption and the topic ban violation. Gamaliel (talk) 22:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
What I've gathered from a year of lurking around this circus is that BLP exceptions are not actually a trump card; you also have to be right. I've seen at least one instance where the exception was found not to apply, because it was decided there was no BLP violation (or at least not one that was considered obvious). In other words, BLP is only an exception when there actually is a clear and obvious BLP violation...as was the case here.Torven (talk) 00:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

Wikidata weekly summary #194

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Thank you for supporting my RfA

Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award
Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Washington Times

Hi, Sorry for not leaving a description. The new owner of The Washington Times is The Washington Times, LLC, according to their website, not News World.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.138.192 (talk) 22:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

I have no objection to you changing ownership information. I was referring to your unexplained removal of the OCLC number. Gamaliel (talk) 22:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gamaliel/Archive_26&oldid=1090515570"