User talk:Ganeshbot/Archive 31
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ganeshbot. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 |
The article Onchidium harmandianum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Nomen dubium per WoRMS, which means it isn't a valid scientific description of a species, and therefore doesn't benefit from the automatic presumption of notability that is accorded to valid species. No legitimate synonymous name to redirect to.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Onchidium pallidum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Nomen dubium per WoRMS, which means it isn't a valid scientific description of a species, and therefore doesn't benefit from the automatic presumption of notability that is accorded to valid species. No legitimate synonymous name to redirect to.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Onchidium planatum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Nomen dubium per WoRMS, which means it isn't a valid scientific description of a species, and therefore doesn't benefit from the automatic presumption of notability that is accorded to valid species. No legitimate synonymous name to redirect to.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Onchidium trapezoideum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Nomen dubium per WoRMS, which means it isn't a valid scientific description of a species, and therefore doesn't benefit from the automatic presumption of notability that is accorded to valid species. No legitimate synonymous name to redirect to.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Typhisala
A tag has been placed on Category:Typhisala indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Typhisopsis
A tag has been placed on Category:Typhisopsis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Harsud
हरसूद िषय पर आपके द्वारा कैसे सहयोग िया गया, यह जानना रोचक है। मैं हरसूद का ही रहने वाला हँ। राजेन्द्र मालवीय 59.95.130.170 (talk) 11:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Naugachia for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naugachia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mikeanand (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
The article Cancellaria nassa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WoRMS has deleted this entry as "reason: There is no such name". It appears it was created as a database error on their end and there was never any species scientifically described with this name. Normally I would redirect a nomen dubium but in this case as it's a database error it's not suitable for redirect. (https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=464721)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:A-Class Tamil Nadu articles of Top-importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 08:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Rampur Naikin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unsourced
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cassiopeia talk 06:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Your article Reoti
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Reoti to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Adr28382 (Talk to me!) 10:15, 2 December 2024 (UTC)