User talk:Genetics4good/Archive 1

Reed pond vector image requests

I found the request from an archive and began work on it. Please kindly advice on style and content: link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkwchui (talk • contribs) 10:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whee. I think this is done for now, but I'm happy to make minor edits to make the content more accurate. See Treatment pond. Jon Chui (talk) 22:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AmateurRadioAntenna.JPG, inaccuracy in description

Your statement:"These kind of antenna's are today outdated and are slowly being replaced by digital stations working via satellite (Orbiting Satellite Carrying Amateur Radio);" is not quite true.

There are very few radio amateurs are involved in satellite communications, far less than those involved in HF or VHF terrestrial communications.

Most amateur radio activity is analog SSB or CW. In fact the most popular digital mode is Morse code (CW), which is usually sent by hand.

HF antennas are far from outdated. There are a few innovations being made in the field of HF antennas, and many HF antennas are in fact larger versions of VHF antennas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjairam (talk • contribs) 19:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foxes, toxic toads, western honeybee and more

Hello, if you have a source for this, yes I know its true but we need a source, please put it in yourself. That yould be ok Thankyou. Enlil Ninlil 16:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:XOF.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:XOF.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Guardium

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Guardium, by DarkAudit, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Guardium is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Guardium, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Guardium itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General note: Vandalism on Taiwan. using TW

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Taiwan, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Folic Acid 13:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove warnings from your user talk page before a considerable period of time has passed. They form a record of your behaviour for any future action to be judged against. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 10:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oil pages

Just wanted to let you know that I'm having some connectivity issues this week, and dig in again on the oil page changes that you're interested in when I surface again. Waitak 13:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-->OK, I'll hold off on uploading the changes unto the main wikipedia articles untill you get back.

--> I'm sorry but due to the long delay (almost 3/4 of a month have already passed), I already altered the oil pages. I'm sorry if I'm unpatient but I can no longer let those that may benefit from this (Penan) wait any longer. Perhaps silly because my post wont make that much difference but still, even if it accounts for just something i can no longer hold off.

CfD nomination of Category:Catapults

I have nominated Category:Catapults (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite ^Talk 21:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bash

Hello. I just want to verify that this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABash&diff=156686174&oldid=138015246 by 81.246.161.84, signed Genetics4good, is by you? --82.182.37.3 (talk) 23:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC) -->indeed it is. If you wish to contact me about it further, look at my blog for contact details. Best regards, Genetics4good[reply]

Ecovillages, Eco municipalities, Sustainable neighbourhoods...

Hey Genetics4good, I appreciate your initiative in getting some discussion going about these various terms. However, I was dismayed to see that you had already begun to make some of the moves:"Eco municipalities" and "Ecovillage" --> "Sustainable neighbourhood." I note the following:

The terms "Ecovillage" and "Eco-municipality" are both very well-defined terms, whereas "Sustainable neighbourhood" is not.
There are ecovillages now on all continents and a Global Ecovillage Network[1].
"Ecovillage" gets 287,000 Google hits; sustainable neighbourhood only 9,500.

Thus, I've restored the "Ecovillage" article and have undone your redirect of "Eco municipalities." The discussion at Talk:Sustainable city is an interesting one, and clearly we need to rationalize what we are going to do with "Eco municipalities," "Eco-town," "Ecopolis" and "Eco-city." Let's not forget that editorial decisions are made by consensus. Sunray (talk) 01:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Longevity Diet

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Longevity Diet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Longevity Diet. Gwernol 09:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As noted, you have 5 days to improve the article. This should be enough time to provide independent, published sources and to rewrite the text to avoid it sounding like an advert for this particular diet. Best, Gwernol 09:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't believe everything you read

There is a lot of puffery but no actual evidence for a "Universal Influenza Vaccine". WAS 4.250 (talk) 09:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Its in development, heard it on local news. Not yet ready

SustainableX.com

Hi Genetics4good,

Not sure how interested in renewable energy or not but I need people to help with SustainableX.com. Have a look at let me know if you are interested.

Rufus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.129.65.37 (talk) 11:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SkyCab

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article SkyCab, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of SkyCab. скоморохъ 12:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Hauteville house comic.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hauteville house comic.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 12:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--> I made a picture from a page within the comic, I guess this is legal, unsure however.

RE:List of most usable [sic] knots

I'm afraid this violates WP:NPOV. I'm afraid it's not up to Wikipedia to tell people what the most useable (and check your spelling) of anything is. I could write articles on what the most useable fridges, computers etc. and they would get deleted in an instant. I suggest you incorporate the information into knots while retaining NPOV. Craigy (talk) 08:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, replied on en.wb. I had some suggestions & already implemented a few of them. It just wasn't book-like enough. Looking forward to some good collaboration, I think :) — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 20:58, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for contributing so many of the photographs you took! We can always use more free images. Keep up the good work! – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 16:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop contributing Survival Wallet relate links

Your username ( Genetics4good ) and the resulting url for many of your recent additions ( http://genetics4good.blogspot.com/ ) indicate a clear violation of the conflict of interest policies of the wikipedia community. Please stop adding these links and assist in removing any remaining you may have entered. Once the survival wallet has been reviewed and suggested by 3rd party sources relating to the topics edited, it may /perhaps/ be added, by someone else. Until then, unless you are adding it to the Survival Wallet article, please refrain. Thanks for all your otherwise good contribs! ∴ here…♠ 05:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Image:Sterntypes.JPG on Stern article

Sorry to remove this picture (I didn't enjoy doing so) but making a crude hand drawing, and then hand lettering it, is not OK on Wikipedia. It's certainly a useful drawing but needs creating in a graphics program to be acceptable here. Sorry again. Regards, - Adrian Pingstone (talk) 14:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK np I will however reupload it to the talk page with a request for other people to recreate it in a graphics prog.

CfD nomination of Category:Infusions

Category:Infusions, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 11:46, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Image:EarthshipVentilation.JPG

Hey, Genetics4good, would you mind if I made an svg version of this picture? Thanks for uploading it! SiegeLord (talk) 23:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

White hat edit

May I ask why you added the external CEH link to the White hat article? Isn't the link to the article enough? Sephiroth storm (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Medicine

Per WP:BRD, could you know please justify your edits on the talk page and establish consensus for any further changes to the lead. Thanks, Verbal chat

Proposed deletion of Healing therapy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Healing therapy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Verbal chat 12:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Body therapy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Body therapy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Verbal chat 12:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you remove a prod you're supposed to justify the removal on the article talk page. Could you do that now please? Otherwise I'll shortly take it to AfD. Thanks. Verbal chat 12:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alternative medicine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please self revert and justify your changes on the talk page, as you have been asked. Verbal chat 12:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Body therapy

I have nominated Body therapy, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Body therapy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Verbal chat 13:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Verbal chat 13:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe Theories Noticeboard

Hi, I've commented on your actions on the fringe theories noticeboard. This is a good place to discuss edits and new articles such as the ones you have created, and try to discern consensus. If you would like to justify your additions, this is a good place (as well as any AfD pages). Yours, Verbal chat 13:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Body therapy

A tag has been placed on Body therapy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Breathing therapy

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Breathing therapy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? QuiteUnusual (talk) 21:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wind vane with compass?

I see you added this [2] to the article Self-steering gear. I am aware of no windvanes that incorperate a compass, nor do I see how it would even work without some sort of electrical componant (such as when one uses an electric tiller pilot to drive a windvane on a compass course). Can you please point me to an example of such a vane? As I dont think they exist and am tempted to remove your edit, but am happy to be proved wrong. Russeasby (talk) 01:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you did not bother responding I went ahead and removed your addition. Russeasby (talk) 01:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied

Userfied, to User:Genetics4good/Alternative society. Let me know when you are done and I will delete that as well. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Environmental video

Category:Environmental video, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 11:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Talk:Appropriate technology

Hi,

Recently you've added a number of suggestions to the Talk:Appropriate technology page which seem to discuss the subject itself, rather than how to edit the article. The comments made in this set of revisions in particular don't appear to discuss editing the article at all - rather, they speculate about different applications of appropriate technology. Per WP:FORUM, this isn't really what our talk pages are for. Please keep that in mind, as off-topic content may be removed from talk pages. Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Waste fired power plant

Hi there, sorry for the delay. Could you clarify what it is you would like to have drawn? I wasn't sure from looking at the linked page. Thanks! —BillC ^talk 22:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that's complicated! Let me have a think about it; it would take a long time (several days' work) to draw, and I wouldn't want to promise something I couldn't deliver on. —BillC ^talk 23:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate Technology Collaborative

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Appropriate Technology Collaborative, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.apptechdesign.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Appropriate Technology Collaborative

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Appropriate Technology Collaborative, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.apptechdesign.org . As a copyright violation, Appropriate Technology Collaborative appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Appropriate Technology Collaborative has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Appropriate Technology Collaborative and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Appropriate Technology Collaborative with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Appropriate Technology Collaborative.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. auto / decltype (talk) 08:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 17:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Comparison of personal aerial vehicles

A tag has been placed on Comparison of personal aerial vehicles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Comparison of personal aerial vehicles

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Comparison of personal aerial vehicles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good. You have new messages at HellinaBucket's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

status

As reviewing admin, I in any case declined the Speedy, because it was not "a very short article lacking context to establish the subject of the article". If anyone wishes to have it deleted they will need to go to AfD, but it is likely that someone will. We have many articles "Comparison of ...", so that is not a reason for deletion. The basic idea for these pages is that the purpose is not to help someone choose, but to provide encyclopedic information as an overview of the subject. Take a look at some of the similar ones. DGG (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please observe neutral point of view and do not disrupt to illustrate a point, as you have abused the requested moves process.[3][4][5] OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of gestures

Hi! I take it you didn't notice that there was a move discussion going on at Talk:Comparison of gestures when you moved it. Could you move the article back to List of gestures, please? I think we should wait for consensus to be formed at the talk page before moving the article. Thanks, Jafeluv (talk) 14:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of gestures was a WP:Stand-alone list, not a comparison. Please see my discussion at Talk:Comparison of gestures. Cnilep (talk) 16:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Types of gestures for background on why an apparently duplicate page exists. Note that Types of gestures consists primarily of unique (albeit often poorly-sourced) information, while the former List of gestures, now Comparison of gestures, is a stand-alone list of links to other Wikipedia pages. Cnilep (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good. You have new messages at Cnilep's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

What's the plan on air coolers and such?

You seem to be in the middle of a big and somewhat controversial re-org. Can you say where the proposal is for this, so we can review and comment? Dicklyon (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genetics4good, are you done with your move project? There is material you bulk-moved with the air coolers section that should go back over to the absorption refrigeration section.... like the paragraphs and image specifically describing absorption refrigerators. If you are done, I will move the block back myself. DMahalko (talk) 13:11, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can he be done? He hasn't even pointed out a plan/proposal yet. Dicklyon (talk) 17:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, for the plan: if we think logically about it, coolers and heaters are best categorised by type (eg solid, gas or liquid coolers/heaters; to the State of matter). An air cooler is a type of gas cooler. However, as they are so widespread still require their own article. The cooler operating by air (now mentioned under "air cooling) is basically a solid cooler. Indeed, in many dictionaries (including Merriam Webster, ...) the incorrect term where the cooling susbstance is used before ...cooler is often mentioned; yielding terms as air cooler, ... for solid matter coolers. However as this is an encyclopedia, we must use a method which works for all our articles.

Thus the solution is simple;

move the now present air cooling article to solid matter cooler
reinstate my info for air cooler
keep the absorption air cooler article (as this type of cooler is very needed to explain air coolers often used in air conditioners, ...) As for the -refridgerator article; I was under the impression that the cooling cycle works both for the absorption air cooler and the refrigeratorn, no ? Keep as is. The absorption refrigerator simply describes the cooler with extra casing.

Genetics4good (talk) 07:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should mention the plan at the talk pages of affected articles. I'm pretty sure that that it won't fly at air cooling, where people interested in air cooling as discussed there aren't going to care much about your plans for what to do about cooling air. If you look at books that mention air cooling, none of them appear to interpret it as something that cools air. Dicklyon (talk) 08:09, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move tag

Hi! When proposing a page move, please remember to substitute the template – use {{subst:move}}, not {{move}}. Also, remember to sign your move rationale with ~~~~ so that the bot can add it under the correct date at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Thanks. Jafeluv (talk) 10:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Genetics4good. I've just now removed the entry from Talk:Bush airplane. I'm assuming that you used the {{move}} template or... something. Regardless, it was a mess, so if you really feel that the article should be moved then you should redo the movereq correctly (Note however that I don't see that movereq going anywhere. It's not up to me obviously, but I doubt anyone will support it).
— $V = I * R$ (talk) 20:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- (To Ω): If you see a badly formatted move request, just go ahead and fix it (the most common problems are missing "subst:" and missing signature). You don't have to agree with the request to fix it – you can oppose right after if you want. But please don't remove malformed requests just because you disagree with them. Jafeluv (talk) 12:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I did actually try. After getting the edit screen though, I was just faced with... a mess. Essentially needing to delete it in order to recreate it anyway, I just decided to delete it and leave a message here instead. That was kind of lazy, I know, but to be honest while it doesn't actually bother me to do so I just don't see the point of going through the process on this one.
    — $V = I * R$ (talk) 22:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(To Genetics4good): Please remember to leave a signed comment after the {{subst:move}} tag to explain why you want the page to be moved. I've added a signature at Talk:Bush airplane, so that the bot can correctly parse the date, but it's still missing an explanation why you want the page to be moved. The procedure is explained here. If you have any problems, don't hesitate to ask on my talk page. Thanks, Jafeluv (talk) 12:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Future aircraft developments‎

The article Future aircraft developments‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Ahunt (talk) 15:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment - we had some discussion about this over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#Future_aircraft_developments and my aim on WP:PRODing it was to get it either fixed, redirected or deleted, since it isn't of much value as it is! - Ahunt (talk) 13:01, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on it but could you give some pointers on how I should alter it ? If I decide to move it into the suggested Aircraft design article, I'll need some other info I could use to inmediatelly have a bit of "weight" for the article. Alternatively, I'm also open for other suggestions.

Genetics4good (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest the topic is so broad that I can't think of a way of making it into a useful article, other than redirecting it somewhere. - Ahunt (talk) 14:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Genetics4good, I noticed that you copy and pasted the content from this article into the aircraft design article. I do not think that is a solution to the root problem; the problem being that the list is a selective, incomplete list that briefly covers many random topics with little rhyme or reason. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#Future_aircraft_developments, and I think it would be more constructive to discuss this there before any action is taken. Thanks, -SidewinderX (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Solar water heating image

Hi, I've taken a look at your image request, and now I have a few questions:

How exactly is the circuit to the water heater tied in? Shouldn't the water heater be taking partially heated water from the solar or other system, heating it to the required temperature, and feeding the appliances?
Seeing as we have a municipal water inlet shown, shouldn't the water outlets from the appliances also be shown going to drain?

My "mail me" link works, so drop me a mail to prod me on this one, and I'll do it over the weekend. --Slashme (talk) 17:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the request is Wikipedia:GL/I#modified_image_of_Active_Solar_Water_Heater_Diagram.svg --Slashme (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

You seem very interested in modern wind turbines etc. These fall under the remit of WP:MILLS. Would you be interested in becoming a member? Just add your name to the bottom of the list of members and you're in. Mjroots (talk) 10:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move requests

Hi! When requesting page moves, like you did at Talk:Jibe, please remember to sign your request with four tildes ( ~~~~ ). Otherwise the bot that's handling the request can't put it under the correct date, and the other participants have to look at the history to see who made the move request. Thanks for understanding. Jafeluv (talk) 13:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Composting toilet ClivusMultrum.jpg

File:Composting toilet ClivusMultrum.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Composting toilet ClivusMultrum.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Composting toilet ClivusMultrum.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SeedStartingGreenhouse.jpg is now available as Commons:File:SeedStartingGreenhouse.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wind generator system.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Wind generator system.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:13, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cuttings greenhouse.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Cuttings greenhouse.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Comparison of bladed rotors for HECS

An article that you have been involved in editing, Comparison of bladed rotors for HECS, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of bladed rotors for HECS. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beagel (talk) 08:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Comparison of ocean wave energy conversion systems‎

An article that you have been involved in editing, Comparison of ocean wave energy conversion systems, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of ocean wave energy conversion systems. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beagel (talk) 09:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Human energy harvesting‎

The article you created Human energy harvesting from Energy harvesting contains a lot of non-human energy harvesting. It was easier to follow as it was before. A redirect from Human energy harvesting to Energy harvesting would be desirable unless you want to edit both pages. Thanks for understanding. --141.219.80.55 (talk) 06:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what in the article is non-human energy harvesting ? Allot of subdivisions are made (eg kinetic energy, ...) but they are all generated by a human.

DO NOT do this again. All you did was delete 99% of the information from Energy harvesting and paste it into your newly created article. Either use the move tab at the top of the page, ask an administrator to help, or discuss it at WP:RfD. Your move was very dubious and could be mistaken for vandalism by some editors. GraYoshi2x►^talk 20:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page move disruption

Please stop doing what you are doing by moving perfectly fine disambig pages to one with (disambiguation) tacked onto the end, as it is against guidelines. You only add it to the end of title when there is a primary topic. GraYoshi2x►^talk 20:19, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't rename articles without discussion

Please don't rename articles without extensive discussion and agreement, as you did with Battery (electricity). This causes extensive work by other editors and administrators to undo the change. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you would need to revert this, the renaming made the article more cohesive and the name it had (battery (electricity)) wasn't quite good anyhow

Graphic Lab

Replies have been made to your request at the Graphic Lab. Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#Modify image Amarrage.svg. Zoo Fari 02:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Comparison of pumps

I have nominated Comparison of pumps, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of pumps. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 21:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plantpot

I just noticed you moved flowerpot to plantpot last year. The latter term is not used anywhere that I can tell. I have nominated it for deletion here at [[6]] but maybe some discussion will lad us to another answer. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Knots/Most useful

I have nominated Category:Knots/Most useful (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFDWarning-ICE fuel conversion

Articles for deletion nomination of ICE fuel conversion

I have nominated ICE fuel conversion, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICE fuel conversion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mion (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Alternative ICE fuel generator

I have nominated Alternative ICE fuel generator, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative ICE fuel generator. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mion (talk) 19:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion and transwikiing

Hi Genetics4good - I commented on the deletion debates for Alternative ICE fuel generator & ICE fuel conversion. Unfortunately I don't think they meet Wikipedia's criteria in their present state. It's essential to remember that the importance of a topic is not the criteria that Wikipedia uses for inclusion (otherwise it would be bogged down in never-ending debates about what is important). If I haven't mentioned it already, see Appropedia:Project:Appropedia is different from Wikipedia.

If you want to develop these pages at Appropedia (which is probably the best idea) then the best option is exporting the pages with their history, via Special:Export. I've done this and saved the XML file. Then when imported to another wiki, the contributors can still be seen, since the original page on Wikipedia won't be accessible. An admin can import the page to Appropedia, so let me know and I'll do this if you want. --Chriswaterguy talk 02:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Solar greenhouse

An article that you have been involved in editing, Solar greenhouse, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar greenhouse. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dmcq (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to the merger

Genetics4good (talk) 09:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Types of gestures

An article that you have been involved in editing, Types of gestures , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 19:21, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested moves

I've closed the move requests you made at Talk:Rifling#Move and Talk:Rifled musket#Incorrection, as neither request gained consensus. You also proposed moving both pages to the same name. If you'd like to propose that the two articles be combined, you should use the proposed mergers process to do so. — æk ^Talk 01:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rare conservation

The article Rare conservation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of third-party sources and notability evidence

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Vernon (talk) 13:11, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel Prize article

I saw that you made a contribution to the Nobel Prize article. It's very nice that you help in trying to make it better. But, I don't see that the section you added was notable enough to be on the main page. It also lacks references etc. If you still want it added feel free to discuss it on the talk page of the Nobel Prize. And please make notes of what you have done when you make an edit. Makes it easier for the rest of the editors to see what have happened. --Esuzu (talk • contribs) 12:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:global warming

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, global warming, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.

Thanks for creating the new article History of global warming, too. I'll add that to the probation. -- TS 17:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Green tuning

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Green tuning. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green tuning. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too many capital letters

Why the capital P and capital S in this move, rather than lower case? (I've moved the article again—this time to stand-alone power system with lower-case initials, per WP:MOS. Michael Hardy (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this makes the abbreviation (SAPS or SPS) more clear.

Genetics4good (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Map of lake chad water levels

Hi

What do you need the map for ? an article on the lake or other ?

If on the lake then we could perhaps use a closer in map than the whole of the world as I think most people know that the Lake is in Africa and they would probably also know where Africa is

thanks...Chaosdruid (talk) 01:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Map done but in the archive -

Only with map of Africa though - will do of world one if necessary though :¬)

Chaosdruid (talk) 08:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Genetics4good. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop.
Message added 02:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Mono·nomic 02:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Water heating image

Hi,

I've replied on my talk page. --Slashme (talk) 15:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another reply. --Slashme (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And again... --Slashme (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again. --Slashme (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another one. --Slashme (talk) 20:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see commons:File_talk:Factory.svg --Slashme (talk) 16:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I've also given another reply about the water tank thing. --Slashme (talk) 16:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Close relationships

Hello, Genetics4good. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

/Lokal _Profil 00:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also finished Internal combustion engine cooling. /Lokal _Profil 23:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the Monogamy image as well. /Lokal _Profil 12:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with diagram.

Hi. We're having difficulty with your diagram File:Tram and train undercarriage.png. (Please see the related discussion at Talk:Rail tracks#"Tram and train undercarriage" image.)

The image is still present at Difference between train and tram rails, but I have removed it from the other three locations. I have difficulty understanding what the image is showing me. It looks like the blue parts are the bogie frames and axleboxes, and the brown parts are the wheels, curiously missing the axle. The effect is that the top image shows the train sitting between the rails. If I ignore the colouring, and the top half of the brown bit, I can see that the blue and brown when combined make up the profile of the tyre and flange plus the axle. I'm sure you have put much care into your diagram, but I don't think it's quite there yet.

Incidentally, after you have adjusted the drawing, please do not use it to replace actual photos of rail profiles. These are also important.

Cheers -- EdJogg (talk) 13:31, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey EdJogg

I'm no train/tram expert, and the images I mentioned are all that I found on the undercarriages. Tell me what to change and I'll unput the changes in next version. Regarding the replacement of actual photo's, I only removed one photo, which I think the image I made also replaced more or less. I removed it primarily to have a better lay-out (became a bit screwed up with so many images).

User:Genetics4good (talk) 17:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At your suggestion I have rearranged the images at tramway track. It really needs more text before it can cope with any more images (which is why I moved some of the existing ones to a gallery). I felt that the removed image was rather significant to the article, so I apologise if I over-reacted.

Regarding your diagram, I'm sorry but I really cannot help you. The other diagram (see the talk page discussion above) clearly shows the difference in wheel and rail profile -- and the reason for a different flange shape -- between grooved and conventional rail. I don't understand what your diagram was trying to show beyond this. As you say you are not a train/tram expert, I would suggest you ask for assistance either at Talk:Rail tracks or at WikiProject Trains where someone with more expertise may be able to help you.

Cheers -- EdJogg (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I made the schematic to show how the carriage stands upon the rail (wasn't sure in the beginning whether wheels were on the inner or outer side, or both, whether there are wheels within the rail itself (ie with train rails), and how the rail profile itself (of the tram rail) was. In addition, I needed a better image for some derivate images (will be uploaded soon). Trough cross-comparison of the images noted in the description, the image is what I came up with.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 08:17, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Finished first derivate image: File:Tram_and_train_rail_in_trench.png ; when I make a better image I'll update these derivates too.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 10:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clivus Multrum diagrams

Hi.

I just vectorised your two Clivus multrum illustrations (1, 2) and was wondering if you could take a look at them to make sure I hadn't missed/missinterpreted any details. Cheers /Lokal _Profil 03:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lokal Profil, The images are real good; the only comment I can give is that the ventilation pipe doesn't seem to completely hook up to the pipe to the outside; actually there shouldn't be 2 pipes at all, simply 1 smooth line (1 pipe). The outside pipe also seems to have a slightly different diameter, both pipes need to be equally big. The problem occurs in both images you made. It seems that my original images also had this flaw, perhaps this is caused due the image clean-up I did a while ago; I uploaded a better version, but I probably removed some color between the pipes aswell, giving the impression now that it are 2 pipes, which they are not. User:Genetics4good (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is the new version of File:Clivus Multrum Composting toilet.svg better? (please ignore the font issues for now, I'll fix that again once the ventilation pipe is fixed). /Lokal _Profil 16:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the font as well. I'll fix the other image to once you confirm that this one is ok. Btw. you might have to purge your cache in order to see the update. /Lokal _Profil 19:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Thanks Lokal Profil.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 07:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected the second one as well. Thanks =) /Lokal _Profil 20:06, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cornish engine

Hi Genetics4good, I saw that you moved Cornish engine to Cornish steam engine - I've made some comments about this on the article talk page, it would be great if you could drop by and give us your thoughts. Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 11:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SVG

I made an SVG of your health pictogram. --Slashme (talk) 18:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biobrandstofcel

Dag Genetics4good

Ik zag je berichtje op mijn OP op wikipedia NL. Ik vind het zeker een waardevolle afbeelding, maar waarin heb je de afbeelding gemaakt? Het png-formaat is namelijk niet het meest handige formaat: het zou handig zijn als de afbeelding in vectorformaat beschikbaar zou zijn (SVG), bijvoorbeeld voor eenvoudige vergroting. Ik werk al een tijdje mee aan Inkscape dus als het mogelijk is, wil ik je hier zeker bij helpen.

Groeten, Annabel (talk) 19:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: atoomcoëfficiënten in molecuulformules staan altijd in subscript, dus niet CO², maar CO₂. Als scheikundige komen mijn haren daar recht van te staan.

Hallo Annabel,

beantwoord op jouw (nederlandse) user talk pagina User:Genetics4good (talk) 07:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ivm de coefficienten; gezien ik geen scheikundige ben snap ik niet goed wat het verschil hierin is. Reeds heb ik ze al in sub, super-script alsook in gewoon schrift zien staan, zelfs in wetenschappelijke artikelen (bv in Popular Mechanics).

Ivm de coëfficiënten: de enige correcte notatie is in subscript. Die keren dat ik het tegenkwam, was in teksten vol pertinente onzin en bij reclame (die dan zoals het reclame helaas meestal betaamt, een loopje neemt met de waarheid). Ik kan het niet anders noemen, dan dat het voorkomen van superscripten voor het aangeven van aantallen atomen bij scheikundige formules, een goede graadmeter is voor nonsens en prietpraat die voor pseudowetenschappelijkheid moet doorgaan. Als je me een wikipedia artikel vindt dat dat toch doet, mag je me dit zeker signaleren. Met vriendelijke groet, Annabel (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Je kan wel cijfers in superscripten tegenkomen, maar dat is enkel om hoeveelheid ladingen weer te geven, vb bij het sulfaation dat tweemaal negatief geladen is: SO₄^2-

Mijne haren stond ook penorent daarover! Ik heb het reggemaakt. --Slashme (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iconography

Hi Genetics4good,

I've replied at Template_talk:Renewable_energy_sources#Template_image and commons:File_talk:Factory.svg#Smokestack. I made formatting edits to your comments, even though that's not generally considered good practice. Please let me know if this irritates you, and I won't do it again! --Slashme (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't irritate me at all.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crockpot still.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crockpot still.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your FFD closure

For your FFD closure here, can you please add the bottom closure at the end of the images you closed? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, seems subst:vk automatically generates a table and closes debate, pretty sure dough 1 vote to keep it won't be enough.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 08:47, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comparison of tablet PCs

The article Comparison of tablet PCs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Random list of tablet PC's, not complete nor manicured to popular models, vast majority of entries lack even 50% of the information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Indolering (talk) 21:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IPSocking to add images

I believe you've been IPSocking to add your images to energy-related articles. To be specific, this to Appropriate technology.

These diagrams of use are of your usual unacceptably low standard and are riddled with farcical technical inaccuracies. To start with, what on earth is domestic hydrogen storage doing in an article on Appropriate technology? Couldn't you limit yourself to personal jetpacks, and other technologies that have at least been demonstrated as workable? Secondly, the diagrams are once again unacceptably inaccurate. This is an encyclopedia, where we're supposed to care about accuracy. It's not a playpen for your random doodles and inventions, particularly not when they look like the work of an ignorant child.

Please stop doing this. Some of us have better things to be doing. I might even get to write articles on real energy technologies, if I wasn't wasting effort chasing this rubbish. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reed beds

Hi Genetics4good,

I've coloured the reed bed diagrams: see WP:GL/I#ReedBedSetUps.jpg. Please check that they're correct. --Slashme (talk) 18:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remarks:

File:Surface_Flow_Reedbed.svg --> remove excess blue lines (keep only 1), color water mass completely blue, left pipe needs to come slightly above the waterline, yet lower than the middle pipe (the water outlet). The middle pipe thus also needs to be hightened. Remove the right pipe (the third one) and place it in the first pond, this first pipe will be the water inlet. The third pond is removed and instead, the pond is swapped for soil. Also curve and extent the water outlet out to the right (for coherence to the other images). Also, there should be a disctinction between concrete, soil and (sand, gravel or) lavastones; ie dark grey, light grey and brown. In essence, just add another line below the concrete and color it brown; there is a black line in the pdf-drawing on which you can base this. The sand, gravel or lavastones (where the plants to root in) can be dawn by dividing the current "concrete block" in half and coloring the upper side light grey. For the "hills", I'm not sure how this is done, perhaps this is just concrete, check this with Dion.

File:Subsurface Flow Reedbed.svg --> take over the underground as I've drawn it in my picture (ie the same lines/layering/hills, ... as the first picture); in essence, there needs to be more or less the same amount of water above the (sand, gravel) or lavastones (not shown in pdf-image); personally, I'd simply draw the water inlet higher up (where the accumulates) and draw only 1 water outlet (without the "box" in the picture nor enlarged besides it, I'm btw not sure what the function of this is), extent the water outlet till end of picture. As noted above, there isn't any difference from the first image, it's simply drawn enlarged so as to show the arrows better, but for an svg this is probably not needed.

File:Vertical Flow Reedbed.svg

Coloring is wrong: water tank is filled with (dirty) water; thus blue instead of grey. The layer where the water inlet goes into actually needs to be composed of 2 colors: ie blue (above the water inlet pipe) and light grey (below the water inlet pipe). However, its probably clearer dough to again use the layering of the first schematic; the only difference with the first image is that there is now a pump added, and that the water goes straight down trough the substrate to the water outlet. The tank/pump doesn't need to be placed lower than the reedbed btw.

Perhaps its useful to also add numbering, add numbers for water inlet, outlet and the 3 layers (concrete, substrate and soil). My suggestions are also best confirmed with Dion dough, I'm no expert on it, but I think the suggestions will be correct.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 18:27, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll make those changes as soon as I get a chance! By the way, please note the difference between wikt:dough and wikt:though ;-] .--Slashme (talk) 16:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, a baker's mistake ... ;)

User:Genetics4good (talk) 17:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

prod of Parallelogram steering linkage

I've prodded Parallelogram steering linkage as wholly inaccurate. Its talk page explains in more detail. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at Talk:Parallelogram steering linkage User:Genetics4good (talk) 11:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Parallelogram steering linkage

An article that you have been involved in editing, Parallelogram steering linkage, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parallelogram steering linkage. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:37, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wildlife of Brazil

A tag has been placed on Wildlife of Brazil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 09:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Misnamed file

Hi Genetics4good,

The image you uploaded under File:Camargue_Red_rice.JPG does not correspond to its title : this rice does not come from Camargue, but from Aude, as written on the bag. Aude is not located in Camargue. I suggest that you reupload the file under a different name and ask for deletion of the current one in order not to propagate the confusion.

Thanks. Skippy le Grand Gourou (talk) 07:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, renaming template added

User:Genetics4good (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thermosiphon water heating system.SVG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thermosiphon water heating system.SVG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 29#File:Thermosiphon water heating system.SVG Andy Dingley (talk) 13:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Curry Leaves.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Curry Leaves.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Curry Leaves.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Curry Leaves.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aircraft design process for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Aircraft design process, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircraft design process until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Draft horse list

Hi, I tossed the draft horse list for several reasons. First of all, the list was horribly inaccurate, Akhal-tekes, Arabians and Andalusians (just to start with the As) are not draft horses. Your source was not reliable, and most of all this list is a duplicative content fork from List of horse breeds. Also, you had many, many links to disambiguated pages or geographic location pages, not the actual breed articles. While we appreciate anything to help improve wikipedia, this was not it. You are welcome to take your concerns to the talk page at list of horse breeds where we can discuss matters further. There is some debate over when breeds move from a heavy warmblood category to the draft category, and thus it's a tricky distinction to make, also. We'd prefer the breeds stay in one list, though there are small lists of breeds in articles such as draft horse. Montanabw^(talk) 02:17, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Windshaft

Hi Genetics4good, with the windshaft article you were mixing up some things, the windshaft is what we in dutch call bovenas, not what we call koningsspil, that is the main shaft, or upright shaft in english (accoording to the mill term dictionary I have). So I removed some irrelevant parts and pictures, and picked one picture from the dutch article. Akoopal (talk) 22:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Akoopal; fixed some other incorrections in articles forthfluing from this mixup.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 10:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks HJ Mitchell

09:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Electric energy station

The article Electric energy station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unlinked WP:NEOLOGISM. The only two outbound links are themselves WP:NEO, hiding the real links (real links, but not under these names) behind piped links, contrary to WP:MOSDAB.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Drying of herbs and spices for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drying of herbs and spices is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drying of herbs and spices until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RJFJR (talk) 15:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Skycab

Hi, please accept my apologies for replying so late, I was unable to access Wikipedia for the last few weeks due to personal reasons. I have retrieved the content of the page from our logs, here's the relevant part:

--- 8< ---

The SkyCab is a concept design of a intelligent and automatic, personal rapid transit system (PRT). It is perceived to move on rails and to have no drivers. Skycab explanation It has been envisioned by Ake AredalNewsclipping of the SkyCab.

Skycab website

--- 8< ---

Cheers! -- Luk ^talk 22:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Green architects

Category:Green architects, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elekhh (talk) 11:03, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyramid Tea Bag.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pyramid Tea Bag.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mango Powder.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mango Powder.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:18, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Curcuma.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Curcuma.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pickled Ginger.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pickled Ginger.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of culinary fruits

I've just completed an overhaul of List of culinary fruits. It's described in detail on the talk page. I don't know if you still have the page on your watch list, but I know you were once interested in how the page is organized, so I thought you might like to take a look. The new organization would make it a whole lot easier to specify, repair and otherwise maintain various ways of categorizing the fruits. Waitak (talk) 19:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It indeed seems like a major improvement. Well done Waitak !

User:Genetics4good (talk) 13:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cloth-wing ultralight aircraft

The article Cloth-wing ultralight aircraft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This class of ultralight aircraft does not exist as recognized by any regulatory authority or other recognized authority. The entire article is WP:OR based on one mention of the term in one general blog on a WP:SPS website, now removed as a ref as not meeting WP:RS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahunt (talk) 13:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nitric vs Nitrous Oxide Production?

Regarding your contribution Nitric_oxide_production.png can you confirm that this apparatus produces nitric oxide, NO, rather than nitrous oxide, N2O, or nitrogen dioxide, NO2? You cite a reference with the title "The Gas That Makes You Laugh", implying that it's N2O. Yet the vapors above the reaction are said to be nitrogen peroxide, NO2 and item 6 in the drawing says that N2O would dissolve in cold water. Does the reaction of copper and nitric acid produce all those oxides of nitrogen so that they have to be separated by their boiling points? Karn (talk) 05:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the image description again, I added a link to the article, read the article.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 13:02, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this, before WP kills someone. Yes, almost any decomposition of ammonium nitrate will produce some nitrous oxide. It will produce a whole lot of other oxides too - the output will be muckier than drag racer's nitrous.

Genetics4good - you do not have the technical skills or basic WP:COMPETENCE to be adding any image to Wikipedia or Commons more complicated than boiling an egg. Please stop doing this. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Comparison of FTP hosting services, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Founding and Network storage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Potato, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endemic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Garam Masala.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Garam Masala.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plate makeup.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Plate makeup.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:41, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cottage cheese.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cottage cheese.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your request on my talk page

Did you make this request on my talk page? If so you forgot to log in so I revdeleted the ip address and signbot's edit to protect your privacy. Tell me if you still want this userfied. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of most highly populated countries

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of most highly populated countries, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:37, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Online shopping, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fetch and DPD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theism.PNG

Hi! Sorry, I saw your message, but completely forgot to act upon it. I undeleted File:Theism.PNG. The only other file deleted at the same period is File:Christianity symbol.png; File:Ichys.svg is an exact duplicate. Please tell me when you are done retrieving the file. (The same message was also left to your Commons account) Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon illegal, etc

Hi, I have no problem with you (or anyone) doing the work to re-add the section if it is supported by proper reliable sources; but the contents of each <ref> tag in the section need to be bibliographic citation to the RS, and not just footnote-like commentary like they mostly are now. In other words, REF tags should be formatted according to citing sources. I haven't taken time to read up on it or I might do it myself. If you take another crack at it, please pay careful attention to the question "is this proposal to make emissions 'illegal' substantively different than cap-and-trade proposals already covered in other sections of the article"? If the answer is no, then any new info in this section should be merged with the cap-and-trade discussion, not stuck in under a redundant, arguably POVish subheading. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Seasalt.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seasalt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Rough guide africanbluesCD.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rough guide africanbluesCD.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Peanut butter.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peanut butter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:CommercialComposter.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CommercialComposter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Black Cardamom.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Black Cardamom.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Black Onion Seed.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Black Onion Seed.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Coriander Powder.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coriander Powder.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ginger Powder.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ginger Powder.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Madras Curry Powder.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Madras Curry Powder.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Aude red rice.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aude red rice.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Red Curry Paste.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Red Curry Paste.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Barley Miso.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barley Miso.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Breakfast Tea.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Breakfast Tea.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Biodiesel images

The images are of homebrew equipment designs; they're both how-to content and based on original research and thus, cannot be included. I'm unsure why you continue trying to foist this quality (questionably safe design, etc) of content on Wikipedia. We've had this discussion before (when you promised to make changes and never did). While you're capable of posting interesting and useful images, you also repeatedly ignore guidelines (particularly WP:NOR) to the point of being disruptive (as been cataloged here and here).--E8 (talk) 16:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just figured that the images were suitable for that page (on biodiesel production, I allready assumed that it wasn't suitable for the Biodiesel page.

I regards to the image you mentioned; the images I made were the promised update (admittedly a bit late). The new images were partly made using the old image.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 14:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Genetics4good, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Andy Dingley (talk) 11:42, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Regarding the SPI report filed against you. There is no absolute rule against editing whilst logged out, but given the contentious nature of the edits you're making I think it's best if you edit solely from your one named account. Editing as an IP may be seen as an attempt to avoid scrutiny (whether deliberate or not). Nothing is going to come of the SPI report this time, but if you don't heed this advice it may lead to a block in future. Regards Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 23:22, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lean fresh cheese.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lean fresh cheese.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AmateurRadioAntenna2.JPG

"The radio station works completely analogue. These kind of antennas are today outdated and are slowly being replaced by digital stations working via satellite (Orbiting Satellite Carrying Amateur Radio; see The OSCAR Wikipedia entry and/or eguipment using the Internet Radio Linking Project"

I'm not sure that station operates completely analog. They could be using digital modes as well. There are multiple kinds of antennas there - I doubt they are outdated. These kinds of antennas are used in everything from television to cellular phone communications, and more. And the Satellite commmunications, antennas used, are based on the principles of these antennas.

You do seem to be talking about Amateur (Ham) Radio when you cite "OSCAR" and "IRLP", Oscar would keep the antennas going, IRLP is a project that links via the Internet - Ham Radio Repeaters (mostly UHF and VHF) which use These Kinds of Antennas. Radio Frequency (RF) transmission is "Analog" ... with modulation that could be analog or digital - Digital being analog tones sent in some kind of sequence to carry the protocol or protocols of the digital content. The analog radio wave signal is "detected" and the modulation is extracted ... be it carrying analog of digital information. Most of which can be decoded by older computers with the proper software and hardware (e.g. sound card + softtware.) I don't think antennas are going anywhere for a LONG time.

2602:306:BCA9:9110:8429:72E9:338E:75A6 (talk) 04:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Environmental issues in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upper Lake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Persistent pollutants

Category:Persistent pollutants, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Leyo 10:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you like to add recent press to articles. Even in the best cases, this can cause WP:RECENTISM problems. When it's only to add examples, especially sourced with press releases or the like, it is much more problematic, usually violating both WP:NOTADVOCATE and WP:NPOV. Please be more careful. --Ronz (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Eugenics into History of eugenics. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Concrete may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

** [[Urbanite]]] (recycled concrete)<ref>[http://www.concretenetwork.com/concrete/demolition/urbanite-recycled-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Earthship may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

are made using wooden shimming blocks (of 6x6x8' dimensions) placed on top of the wooden bond beam (the latter is basically just 2 layers of 2x12 lumber bolted on concrete anchors (poured blocks of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:07, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closed requested move at Talk:low-speed vehicle

Hello, I've closed the above-mentioned move request as it seems (from the title and pages in question) you were requesting a merge. The process for proposing a merge is detailed on this page, however in this case, while the two articles have similar titles, the topics they cover seem to have little if any overlap and I'd advise against proposing this merge. If you had a different requested move in mind, please let me know. Thanks benmoore 20:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Comparison of free off-line GPS software (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Free, Rana, Maverick, Trax, Android, Python and Tablet PC

GPS navigation software (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Magellan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Agriculture in Vietnam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Will Frith

Simon Reeve (UK television presenter) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Will Frith

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Live Aid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparison of tablet computers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of tablet computers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of tablet computers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:24, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparison of 12-13.3 inch subnotebooks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of 12-13.3 inch subnotebooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of 12-13.3 inch subnotebooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:28, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red Brigade Lucknow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wu shu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Computer cooling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Car-free movement may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

less [[Blind_spot_(vehicle)|blind spots]]), reduced noise/traffic, reduced tailpipe emissions, ...) it also offers financial advantage for the companies, as tractor units require a lot of time to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sex toy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page REACH. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Summaries

Hi there.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 19:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of VR HMD mount

The article VR HMD mount has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

obvious neologism: subject adequately covered elsewhere already

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 19:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Online platforms for collaborative consumption, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uber. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Online platforms for collaborative consumption

Hi, Genetics4good. I've reverted your additions to Online platforms for collaborative consumption, as the list entries seemed non-notable, as they lacked links to Wikipedia articles. Please add back along with links to existing Wikipedia articles. Thanks, Stesmo (talk) 19:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Utherverse Digital Inc.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Utherverse Digital Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Debris linux, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Beep and Mediaplayer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Desertification may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

research centre on Mycorrhiza]</ref> An example of a promosing setup is [[Jujube]] combined with [[Glomus aggregatum]<ref>[http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1380187569_Guissou.pdf

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3D printing : STL errors

Hello,

I informed you that I've done an edit of your section about STL files errors on 3D printing page. I add references, and I precised the possibles errors.

Sincerely,

R3sJAP155M (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Genetics4good. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EcoShape

What is "EcoShape" and what does it have to do with coastal management? I see you added it to the See also -section of the article a couple of years back, but it's a redlink with an external reference that has no context whatsoever, so it caught my eye as out of place. -- turdas^talk 20:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DEEP-IN

Hello Genetics4good,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DEEP-IN for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Arthistorian1977: and obviously Genetics4good — the article was deleted (I don't really agree with the deletion, but regardless...), I recreated the article with more content, the deletion was reversed just so that the content you wrote wasn't invisible on the edit history, and it's been patrolled now. Looks notable and rather interesting, so I'm going to keep working on it. Appable (talk) 20:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fair Tax Town, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multinationals. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of DNA sequencing services, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illumina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of genetic engineering software, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page J5. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Life spans of home appliances, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Life span. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Genetics4good. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of OpenEnergyMonitor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on OpenEnergyMonitor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CatcherStorm ^talk 12:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bovine eaters

Hi. I removed a portion of your added clarifying text on Semi-vegetarian (as for SV, there is no such thing, seems to be one of the badly named pages) which was written after my reply, which makes my comment a bit out of context. Maybe it can go in your reply? Thanks. Randy Kryn 18:00, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved the text to here:

Perhaps the term should refer to people that don't eat flesh from bovines, nor drink the milk coming from bovines.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 07:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fossil fuel power station

I noticed you added the text: "It also features a nuclear power plant next to it, which emits no CO2 at all" to Bełchatów Power Station. This is incorrect. The hyperbolic cooling towers are for water vapor used to turn the coal powered generators. Brian Everlasting (talk) 22:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the water vapor of them is used to wash out sulfur dioxide from the coal-fired power plant ? I didn't know both nuclear and fossil fuel power plants were ever connected in some way (I just thought both were placed near each other for electricity distribution purposes), but now that you mention this, it indeed makes sense.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any nuclear power station within a 5 mile radius of the Bełchatów Power Station site? No.

Cooling towers are not flue-gas desulphurisation

" I didn't know both nuclear and fossil fuel power plants were ever connected in some way " They're not.

"but now that you mention this" No-one, except you, has mentioned this.

Genetics4good - yet again (and I am so, so tired of years of this) you are adding new content based on your own technical understanding of a topic and you do not have (have never had, and I do not believe you will ever have) the technical competence to do so. Your track record for such errors, and the wasted efforts of others in cleaning them up, is enormous.

Please stop editing content anything like this. This is a harsh thing to say, but you have never demonstrated an ability to do it anything like accurately enough for even our low standards here. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Point taken.

Perhaps though that a variant of the Coal-fired power plant schematic here at wikimedia commons can be requested at the image lab and uploaded to the wikimedia commons -and linked from that main image as a variant- ? The main image has no cooling tower in its cooling circuit from the condensor (rather it just connects to the river). A variant with a cooling tower can be made similar to this schematic. This could have avoided me of getting confused on this.

User:Genetics4good (talk) 12:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reading a book would have given you the same information. It is good to acquire such information before inventing false information to articles. You have done this so many times before that you have no excuse for continuing. I would welcome your indef blocking because of this, it is that bad a problem and you are so incapable of addressing it (I've had this same conversation with you for seven years now).

There are two needs here: providing an image for you, providing an image for WP. You are easy - you can read [7], or a library book. WP is harder, as we need a freely licensed image. Getting an image for WP is tricky, but you have no excuse.

File:Coal_fired_power_plant_diagram.svg is pretty good and simpler, thus clearer, than File:PowerStation2.svg etc. However it does show river cooling, a largely American practice, rather than cooling towers. Redrafting it with cooling towers (and ideally, more clearly showing the separation of condensed feedwater and condenser cooling water) would indeed be useful. But please don't try it yourself. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]