User talk:Georgeeliotismybae

Welcome!

Hello, Georgeeliotismybae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kate Faulkner) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kate Faulkner, Georgeeliotismybae!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good. I've added an extra book citation and a tag on the talk page.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Female Political Union of the Working Classes

Hello, Georgeeliotismybae. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Female Political Union of the Working Classes, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.55% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for April:

April+Further with Art+Feminism Archaeology Military history (contest) Geofocus: Indian subcontinent

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 08:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Boorman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Draft:Emma Boorman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AmericanAir88 (talk) 02:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this to article space and cleaned it up a little. I'll go through all such cases here and do whatever seems appropriate – just let me know if you have any objections or requests. Andrew D. (talk) 17:19, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Yvonne Canu

Hi, I'm Hydronium Hydroxide. Georgeeliotismybae, thanks for creating Yvonne Canu!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider adding evidence to more clearly establish notability/impact/critical attention against one or more of the criteria at WP:ARTIST. As it stands, it appears questionable that she passes the notability bar, and would survive WP:AFD (quick gsearch also performed).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joséphine Benoîte Coffin-Chevallier (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Joséphine Benoîte Coffin-Chevallier instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is essentially the same as the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joséphine Benoîte Coffin-Chevallier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joséphine Benoîte Coffin-Chevallier, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Georgeeliotismybae! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerda Roosval-Kallstenius has been accepted

Gerda Roosval-Kallstenius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep (talk) 11:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anne, Baroness Ockham moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anne, Baroness Ockham, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 17:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To get this into mainspace, I have moved it to Anne, Baroness Ockham and made that a provisional redirect to her husband. Your original version is still in the history which can be expanded as and when there's more to say. I'll get the link in draftspace deleted to tidy up. Andrew D. (talk) 14:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anne, Baroness Trevor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anne, Baroness Trevor, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 17:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mary, Countess of Harold moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mary, Countess of Harold, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 17:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frances, Countess of Lichfield moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Frances, Countess of Lichfield, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 17:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frances, Countess of Winchilsea and Nottingham moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Frances, Countess of Winchilsea and Nottingham, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 17:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Juliana, Duchess of Leeds moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Juliana, Duchess of Leeds, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 17:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Frances, Baroness Byron a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. It looks like you've taken a copy of Victoria-Tess Jenner's sandbox, User:Victoria-Tess Jenner/sandbox and created the article using that work, thus robbing VTJ of the credit she's due for her work. Cabayi (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft pages

Hi. I would really recommend that you don't move pages from draft to article space until they are fully referenced and meet the criteria for inclusion. It's okay to be new, but it's unwise to ignore advice like the above. Deb (talk) 22:44, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Events

With a bit more time on my hands I see your event was this, which doesn't appear to have had any interaction with the wiki-community. Can I point you at WP:GLAM, Wikipedia's outreach for museums, and to wmuk:Cultural partnerships, Wikimedia UK's Cultural partnerships page where you can get help for any future events and in other ways. Cabayi (talk) 19:40, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Thanks Cabayi - we actually have partnered with Wikipedia for several events, but none of these partnerships were suggested! So, good to know for future events.Georgeeliotismybae (talk) 15:34, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary, Countess of Harold (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As much as I'm a fan of historical biographies, I'm not seeing anything about this person which meets WP:BIO. She was born into peerage, she married, she had kids, she died. These are all routine things. What about her stands out as being notable?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary, Countess of Harold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary, Countess of Harold, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 18:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juliana, Duchess of Leeds has been accepted

Juliana, Duchess of Leeds, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 03:38, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frances, Countess of Lichfield has been accepted

Frances, Countess of Lichfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 03:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne, Baroness Trevor has been accepted

Anne, Baroness Trevor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 04:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frances, Countess of Winchilsea and Nottingham has been accepted

Frances, Countess of Winchilsea and Nottingham, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:27, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary, Countess of Harold has been accepted

Mary, Countess of Harold, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The New Female Coterie has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The New Female Coterie. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The New Female Coterie has been accepted

The New Female Coterie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]