User talk:Gippyboy66

Speedy deletion nomination of Cutlers_beach,_wonthaggi_heathlands

Hello Gippyboy66,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cutlers_beach,_wonthaggi_heathlands for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Itemirus^{Message me!} 16:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Oaks, Inverloch

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Oaks, Inverloch, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cindy(talk) 12:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Oaks, Inverloch

Hello, Gippyboy66. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Oaks, Inverloch, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 04:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know a good place you can contribute.

Hi. Wherever The Oaks, Inverloch is, you can contribute the information to Wikivoyage. This would be useful there and they accept this kind of material. Go to wikivoyage.org to contribute. See WP:NOT for why this content (Original Research) is not acceptable for Wikipedia. Thanks, Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 04:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Oaks, Inverloch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Oaks, Inverloch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oaks, Inverloch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 03:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cutlers Beach, Wonthaggi Heathlands

The article Cutlers Beach, Wonthaggi Heathlands has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to significance, WP:Wikipedia is not a directory of beaches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]