User talk:Glassdaughter

November 2021

Hello, Glassdaughter, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)@Theroadislong: Hello, Theroadislong. As disclosed in the GaryNNader [talk:Gary Nicolas Nader|draft talk] page, I created the GaryNNader account for GaryNNader. I had no intention to continue using that account beyond drafting the article for submission. Moving forward I will continue all my work from the Glassdaughter account, as suggested by [[1]]. Concurrently I'm studying the Wikipedia help pages on editing drafts and comments to understand navigating through all the remaining edits to get the draft ready for resubmission. Glassdaughter (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Glassdaughter. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Glassdaughter. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Glassdaughter|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 15:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: Hello Theroadislong. Thank you for detailing the disclosure process, that was helpful. I added a disclosure template and filled it out with my employer. To my knowledge, my employer is not being compensated by anyone, so I used this template:

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by ACME for their contributions to Example.

. If I have misunderstood the process, please let me know. Otherwise, please indicated if I can continue to edit at this point. Thanks. --Glassdaughter (talk) 16:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your disclosure. Theroadislong (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Nader has been accepted

Gary Nader, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TipsyElephant (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gary Nader for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Nader, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Nader until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]