User talk:Graphitus

Tarot edits

Hi Graphitus and welcome to WP! Recent edits by you to the tarot article have been kind of detrimental to the flowing of the text, I think. The information you contributed, although well-written and otherwise fine, was unsourced and was placed under a heading which it didn't belong. The most recent edit in which you added information about playing cards is irrelevant considering the topic of the article. Also, the listing of the card names in English and other languages isn't necessary and doesn't follow Wikipedia's style guides. Sam 00:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Please check the talk page (discusssion tab) before editing an article to see if there are any conventions you should follow or if things have been agreed.

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. BlueValour 23:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References

We have established in the Huddersfield article that references should be in the form <ref>...</ref>. A mixture of this type of reference, and inline references looks awful. Please read WP:CITE. BlueValour 23:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Headings

Please capitalise the initial letter in the first word. Please see WP:MOS. You will rapidly lose sympathy if editors have to clean up after you. BlueValour 00:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tarot

Hey Graphitus! Just dropping by to tell you the tarot article has been nominated for improvement here.

I apologize if I had anything to do with your recent cessation from editing the article. I can be too fastidious sometimes and controlling. Please don't let me get in your way. I wrote some things on the to-do list on its talk page. Feel free to add anything you feel is needed. :-) Sam 18:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]