User talk:Grarunkumar1994

November 2016

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pulimurugan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, re: these changes, genre is subjective, so it should be sourced as well. Additionally, we typically only go with one main genre and one sub-genre if further clarification if necessary, and usually only if multiple sources consider that phrasing. Calling something a "vigilante crime thriller" is a bit odd since "vigilante crime thriller" isn't a major genre or even a sub-genre. It's like two sub-genres mashed together on top of a major genre. Please provide sources that call it a "vigilante crime thriller". Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Pulimurugan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pulimurugan. Diff: [3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 10:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Baahubali 2: The Conclusion. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [4] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Drishyam. Diffs: [5] Specifically your hyperbolic "unanimous praise" editorial. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajamani (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VersaceSpace was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajamani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rajamani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

versacespace talk to me 18:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grarunkumar1994! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! versacespace talk to me 18:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 12th Man (film)‎, you may be blocked from editing. Given the history of disruptive edits, plus your lack of sourcing on something that's untrue, it's difficult to assume your revision was in good faith. Geeky Randy (talk) 02:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rajamani

Hello, Grarunkumar1994. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajamani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rajamani

Hello, Grarunkumar1994. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajamani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rajamani

Hello, Grarunkumar1994. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajamani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]