User talk:Green wanderer89

January 2023

Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I noticed that you recently removed content from Western Atlantic University School of Medicine without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your move as draft:Western Atlantic University School of Medicine is not ready to be an article. Adakiko (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is the 2nd time you have done this. Please stop attempting to circumvent the AFC process, especially since the article has been rejected which means it can't be resubmitted. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rootstock has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rootstock. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rootstock (company) (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject. Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rootstock (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Green wanderer89! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rootstock (company) (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rootstock (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 18:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rootstock (company)

Hello, Green wanderer89. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rootstock".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 07:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External URLs

In your edits to Dating app and Spark Networks, you added external URLs to the body of the articles. Please don't do that. URLs outside of wikipedia can be cited as references, or (in some cases) added to the External links section. Schazjmd (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]