User talk:HMS Lolipop

Problems with upload of File:TBRMinstudio.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TBRMinstudio.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm Michig. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Trixie's Big Red Motorbike because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!--Michig (talk) 10:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy deletion criteria are explained at WP:CSD. You should also take a look at WP:3RR. --Michig (talk) 11:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trixie's Big Red Motorbike. Your edits appear to constitute possible vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Widr (talk) 12:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Michig (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Trixie's Big Red Motorbike shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Widr (talk) 12:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Michig (talk) 12:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]