User talk:Haverly999

Welcome!

Hello, Haverly999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Michael J. Franklin (CPO), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jac16888 ^Talk 00:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael J. Franklin (CPO)

The article Michael J. Franklin (CPO) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jac16888 ^Talk 00:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Michael J. Franklin (CPO)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Michael J. Franklin (CPO) meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Franklin (CPO). Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. JNW (talk) 21:37, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Judson012 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. AussieLegend (talk) 00:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Judson012 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Elockid ^(Talk) 11:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Haverly999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello,

you think, that Judson012 has a second account, that's wrong. I met Mike Franklin in Baden-Baden during an event. He told me something about his life and I was very impressed. I asked him about an article in Wikipedia, but he told me, that he had never thought about an article. He is a very interesting person, with a lot of skills and expert knowledge. His life is very turbulent and he has helped a lot of famous people to feel safe and protected. This was the reason that I asked him, whether I can start an article about him and he answered "yes". We phoned twice, because I needed more information and a picture of him. He shared one in Wikimedia. And I bought his first book and read it. It was very impressively. Therefore I want him in Wikipedia, because he is a person, that deserves attention. I can't follow, why you asked, whether he is a notable person or not. He was a notable person for all the famous people he protected and I think, that they were glad to have him around them. Best regards Haverly

Decline reason:

Sorry, but even in the absence of checkuser evidence, the edit mentioned below contradicts your assertion; and the checkuser evidence is unambiguous. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Editors,

My name is Michael J. Franklin and I have stood back and dispassionately watched in horror what exchanges and communications that have taken place in an attempt to have the article “Michael J. Franklin (CPO)” entered into Wikipedia’s database. I thank you for your comments and observations. I have a problem that I would now like to tell you about. When the idea of the article inclusion was first suggested to me. I wasn’t in favor of it for many reasons. The people who wanted to submit the article don’t speak English as their mother tongue and I’m of the opinion that having anything added to the database is extremely difficult and complicated. I wasn’t prepared to have to defend myself from what appears to be happening. This isn’t directed at anyone in particular but is how I’m feeling at the moment.

To be more specific, there are more than 2 people working or have worked on the project, the first “judson012” a Mrs. Irmgard Walter and “Haverly999” Mrs. Maike Rogge, these are two separate and wonderful people whose intentions were in the right place. However, they experienced a myriad of problems by not really understanding the rules. The one editor’s comment that the two are the same person and a conflict of interest might exist…baffles them and quite frankly me as well. It seemed whatever they tried it backfired. The people working on this project are honest and forthright individuals. They are trying to add an article they feel is worthy and aren’t trying to sell anything. The facts that they have presented to date can be supported, although, they have discovered that attaching anything is hard. At the moment there seems to be a degree of resignation on their part. This saddens me. They were advised by you (the editors) that references were required. It made me feel good to know that they had to include at least one 3rd party independent source. They thought that they had…only to receive other confusing and frustrating comments on the “talk” page. They then added book references that met with the same confusing and frustrating comments. I find the above comments way over the top and therefore request that you delete this article at your first possible opportunity. It appears that there are other factors at work here. Many of the people I’ve protected have themselves stated reservations about Wikipedia and its practices. I now think that they may be right.

With kindest regards to you all Mike Franklin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.81.178.23 (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is your explanation of this edit where someone using the account Judson012 signs himself Haverly999? JohnCD (talk) 15:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]