User talk:HistoricalAnomaly
March 2024
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Kashmiris, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. A type of cabinet (talk) 15:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HistoricalAnomaly reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- wow i literally gave all the proofs and was false reported, you can literally check it yourself, somehow me as a native to kashmir don't know about my own language and what my people are called in our language? wikipedia is going to be dead because of this, so much false information HistoricalAnomaly (talk) 18:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- You were blocked not for the content but for your behaviour. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and if your change is undone, it means you need to discuss it with others – see Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Anyhow, you have not brought any added value to Wikipedia, only wasted other volunteers' time, and your indefinite block is justified. — kashmīrī TALK 18:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- i am new on wikipedia and just opened account today and i didn't knew you have to discuss before changing the information, can i have my ban reversed as i really want to contribute to the wikipedia HistoricalAnomaly (talk) 19:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- You were blocked not for the content but for your behaviour. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and if your change is undone, it means you need to discuss it with others – see Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Anyhow, you have not brought any added value to Wikipedia, only wasted other volunteers' time, and your indefinite block is justified. — kashmīrī TALK 18:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)