User talk:InsightSeeker1

December 2024

Hello, I'm Gaismagorm. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Joseph Sitt seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gaismagorm (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edits made were in accordance with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy. The intention was to ensure that the content remains balanced and in line with Wikipedia's guidelines, while also protecting the safety and privacy of individuals involved. No factual information or links were removed; however, concerns have been raised about the tone of the referenced article, which may not fully reflect a neutral perspective. Maintaining a neutral tone is essential in preventing the spread of misinformation and ensuring that the article does not present a biased or opinionated view, particularly in cases where public perception may be divided. Additionally, the article referenced in this section has been mentioned in some publications as potentially reflecting antisemitic tropes. Given this context, it would be valuable to reintegrate the content that was removed to provide a more comprehensive and balanced view.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-accused-advancing-antisemitic-trope-nyc-mayor-adams-office-ashamed, https://jewishinsider.com/2024/05/washington-post-under-fire-for-story-alleging-outsized-influence-by-jewish-donors/, https://www.camera.org/article/the-washington-post-reanimates-antisemitism/ InsightSeeker1 (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Foxnews has been determined to be unreliable with politics. Check wikipedia:reliable sources/perennial sources. either way, it is unlikely to be implemented as the info you have added doesn't follow a neutral point of view. Gaismagorm (talk) 23:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Joseph Sitt. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Gaismagorm (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Gaismagorm (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]