User talk:Ironduckie

Welcome!

Hello, Ironduckie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 19:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved

You were creating your userpage in your sandbox. I moved it to your actual userpage, User:Ironduckie. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 19:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm getting the hang of it. What's the best way to start editing pages/content? Ironduckie (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Ironduckie[reply]

I recommend looking at pages you're interested in, and seeing what you can do at the Task center. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ironduckie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked for the following reason I'm trying to go through the steps to state that I do work for Thinkwell and I'm ensuring that we do NOT have advertorial content on the page. If anything, I want to ensure that the copy IS of the correct guidelines for Wikipedia. It's not beneficial to anyone to have it written that way, so I'm trying to fix that. I'm new to wiki and just trying to learn the steps to make sure the content is of the appropriate guidelines for this site, and that I'm following the rules. So can someone help fix these issues and show me the right way to clean this up?

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Your appeal does not address this. MER-C 12:29, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ironduckie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not sure why I'm considered a sock puppet of User ArianaJarvis. She no longer works with the company, and as stated before, I'm trying to go through the proper steps to ensure the page is updated correctly. I read through WP:BFAQ#Disclosure and am trying to follow that protocol. Again, I'm not a sock puppet of ArianaJarvis. She doesn't work for Thinkwell anymore, and I recently started and took it upon myself to clean up the 'advertising' copy that is on the page. Do you really think it's in the best interest of the company to even have advertising copy on the page in the first place when that alone violates what Wikipedia is supposed to be used for? I'm TRYING to make this right and accurate, but block-happy mods have been less than helpful. So either fix the page yourself, or show a new user who wants to make this right how to do it himself. Ironduckie (talk) 02:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:COWORKER: "Closely connected users may be considered a single user for Wikipedia's purposes if they edit with the same objectives." There's also AKellam910, for example, blocked as an advertisement-only account while "Looking through content currently to make sure it does not look like an advertisement". I find such claims coming from further representatives of Thinkwell Group unpersuasive. Huon (talk) 02:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block modification

Following an appeal to the Arbitration Committee, the block on this account has been modified to match the block reason of one of the prior related accounts. Further unblock requests can be heard by the community.

Ironduckie: Please read WP:PAID, WP:COI, and WP:PSCOI carefully before submitting an additional unblock request. Let me know if you have questions. –xeno^talk 02:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]