User talk:Isolani

Welcome!

Hello, Isolani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

VfD

Hi, Isolani, you forgot to sign your vote at the VfD for The Poppykettle Papers. You can do this by adding four 'tildes' after your vote: ~~~~. -Splash 5 July 2005 22:33 (UTC)

Herbert Sutcliffe picture

Thanks for uploading the picture of Herbert Sutcliffe ([[Image:Sutcliffe.jpg]]). Could you include information on its source and licensing details on the image page though, please? We need to be confident that there will be no copyright problems, you see; images without such details tend to get deleted these days. Thanks. Loganberry (Talk) 6 July 2005 22:50 (UTC)

Erfurt Program

I don't have enough knowledge on the subject, so I simply ask the initial author of the article: could you clarify in article on the Erfurt Program who adapted this program (SPD?) and why it is called the Erfurt Program? Moreover, I guess you mean by revolution as used in the article a socialist revolution?

Also adding a reference to a book or other publication might be useful too.

Keep up the good works!

Koffieyahoo 8 July 2005 11:37 (UTC)

Mea culpa on the original author thingy. Apparently I can't do three things at the same time: finalising a PHD thesis, writing an paper, and reading stuff on wikipedia... Koffieyahoo 13:31, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Have replied at Talk:Lothar de Maizière. PMA 9 July 2005 04:22 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for all your WikiContributions! --Fir e Fo x

Fir e Fo x 16:58, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Excuse me, sir or madame. I am the author for the article, The trials of Nikki Hill. It was the publisher's blurb, but I didn't know it was a copyright violation. Don't be so quick to delete, I can certainly create another standardized page. I didn't honestly know what the minimum requirements were for a page like that. Rhetoricalwater 15:36, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a summary to the subpage category, tell me is it wiki material.Rhetoricalwater 02:14, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for your support on my RfA. It is sincerely appreciated. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 15:17, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lemon law speedy tag

I've rewritten the Lemon law article and removed the "speedy for copyvio" tag you added. I left the AfD intact though.--Isotope23 16:50, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Opri

The contents of the article could be true. A google for gene and opri gets a lot of hits. Tintin 17:48, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fir e Fo x RFA

Isolani

Thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was (96/2/0), so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any queries about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Again, thanks!

Fir e Fo x 18:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi Isolani,

Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I was both surprised and delighted about the amount of support votes and all the kind words! If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know! Regards, Joann e B 23:05, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Luther and the Jews

Isolani, could you do me a favor and look in on the Talk page of Martin Luther and the Jews? I'm trying to keep this page balanced and accurate. It is proving very difficult, since I'm the sole Lutheran voice here at the moment. Would you examine my posts and tell me if I'm crazy or unreasonable? --CTSWyneken 02:21, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Chime in, if you'd like, if to do nothing else but say... "what he said..." --CTSWyneken 20:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Isolani! It could take quite some time to translate the whole thing (it runs 140 pp. in the WA). Let's see what the folk working on these pp. will want to do. Perhaps several can work on it. --CTSWyneken 14:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

From Dominick

Thanks. I don't know if it matters, but signing up with yuor ID is better anyhoo! Welcome to Cath101! Dominick ^(TALK) 23:32, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VWN en WCN

Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org . Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, effeietsanders 15:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiprojects Catholicism

Something new ...

This user is a member of
WikiProject Catholicism.

evrik 18:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Torenbreskens.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Torenbreskens.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Stifle 13:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the PUI tag. If the image is kept it will be removed by someone else. The uploader should not remove the tag. If you want to claim that it should be kept then please do so at the appropriate page. Thanks. The JPS 17:03, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rvrt, on Marx Shachtman

Thanks for spoting this and reverting it. In this case, even the blogged source does not aupport the claim. Take a look at similar disputes with the same user at French Turn and Neo-conservatism. --Duncan 18:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! It's not quite the worst, but I am glad I am patient. Have you look at Jacrosse's Talk page? It's astonishing. It really shows why we need more administrators. --Duncan 19:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's Alice through the Looking-glass. But I am not sure that anything will happen beyond 24 hour bans. He has a lot of time on his hands. I am luck that I have some energetic American making th same points as me, otherwise this bizarre invention os his will spread and spread. Of coyurse we are polite but, how do you say it, 'maar binnen wij koeken'. --Duncan 19:10, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I made the terrible mistake of ending my studies of Dutch and swapping for German. Now I can't speak one without using grammer and vocabulary from the other. I should be rolled out as a warning to language students of what happens if you don't exercise your language skills. Can you image the shame, as Brit, of speaking Dutch to a Flemish railwayman and being replied to in German. Terrible. --Duncan 19:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is horrible. I had to memorise the Aeneid but I think now even that would be cruel and unusual punishment. Surely students bon't have to read books these days, do they? It's all PowerPoint. P.S. You have some cool boxes on your page. I have stolen a few. Is there somewhere were they all live together? --Duncan 19:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, is thee anything people feel they cannot blag their way though? I had a great experience yesterday where some guy was using ad hominem as if it means personal. A tricky occurrance, but one looks even worse for pointing it out. At least you have long holidays... Okay. I'm going to log off and go home. By the way, I was just thinking was a lovely page serial comma is. How sweet. If only one could find the same enthusiasm for vulgar Marxism. Have a good weekend. --Duncan 19:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The MBA was a recent move. I majored in organisational behaviour and found it very useful for poltical activities. I'm also a big fan of study. --Duncan 21:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slade Professor of Fine Art

Thanks for spotting my oversight. Agathoclea 14:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

== talk page slog out & apologies ==

Hi, now that I've regained my senses I realize I ve been a bit of an asshole on the Transhumanist talk page. I hope you will accept my apologies for being less than cordial.--Isolani 00:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies accepted. --Loremaster 23:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update on French Turn and Max Shachtman

I thought you might like appreciate a quick Update on French Turn and Max Shachtman; you've recently contributed there and you might have seen that a moderation was attempted on some disputed edits made by User:Jacrosse. he agreed to the moderation but did not take part in it. It agreed to delete some unsupported and referenced claims (basically, that Shachtman's current, far from fragementing and collapeing into cold-war social democarcym actually effected a Leninist takeover, both of US social democracy and then of US neo-conseratism. At this point Jacrosse is engaging in obvious acts of vandalism without even beginning to comment on the Talk pages. Perhaps Jacrosse will sit down to Talk, however it seems unlikely. Arbitration may be on the cards. If you can spare a little time over the next week or two, I would appreciate it if you could pop into Talk:French Turn or Talk:Max Shachtman. Your contribution has been very valuable and, of course, the danger is that all parties in this dispute get tangled up and lose our way towards improving the entries. Thanks for the help you've already given. --Duncan 17:05, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Catholic Collaboration of the Week!

I just wanted to make you aware of the new Catholic Collaboration of the Week, and invite you to participate! --Hyphen5 20:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You showed support for the Catholic Collaboration Effort.
Remember that voting to support an article implies a commitment to contribute to the article.
This week Catholic social teaching was selected to be improved.
We hope you can contribute!

Image:Sutcliffe.jpg

Hello Isolani,

I have tagged the above image as having no source. It will be deleted in seven days unless the source is provided by then. Every image on Wikipedia is required to state its source, so that we can check that the licensing information is accurate.

Thanks,

Stephen Turner (Talk) 12:16, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

abortion opening

Please weigh in on the abortion poll on the abortion talk page. The poll is asking about the introduction. ____G_o_o_d____ 11:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

This is a reminder to go vote by June 7 for the
Catholic Collaboration of the Week.
Support or comment on the current nominations, or nominate an article for collaboration.

Wikiproject Catholicism Assessment

Hello, fellow WikiProject Catholicism member. The project has recently begun work on assessing articles relating to Catholicism, and you are invited to comment and participate. The subpage for this assessment is located here. Thank you. —Mi ra 07:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Carloschmid.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Carloschmid.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church

There is a vote at Talk:Roman Catholic Church: A Vote on the Title of this Article on moving Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. You are invited to review it. --WikiCats 03:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beit Ha'Chidush

Ik zag dat je een gedeelte over Beit Ha'Chidush had gewist. Was het echt een Poerim-grap? Het stond al wel vermeld in het artikel op Joods.nl dat het samenviel met Poerim, maar de rest van het artikel had zo'n serieuze ondertoon dat ik meende dat het hier toch ging om een serieus bericht, en dat het toeval was dat dit samenviel met Poerim ... Maar bedankt dat je het opgehelderd hebt. De volgende keer zal ik wel drie keer denken voordat ik weer in een Poerim-grap trap ;-) Rick86 19:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diocesan Infobox

To the members of the WikiProject Catholocism

I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!!

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Iglogo.JPG, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 14:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Syn2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Syn2.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PVV

Thank you for the invitation, but, as I live in Italy, I haven't the sufficient information to speak about PVV. So sorry but I can't help you. Anyway I don't agree with you about inserting informations about Dion Graus in the article: I think that they aren't relevant in that context. I'm sorry if you feel isolated even by me...! Anyway, thanks for asking my opinion. --Checco 19:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is only modestly interesting for me but at least I have studied Dutch, which might be an asset. I don't understand the dispute enough from the Talk page to take a stance on this, which suggests the Talk pages is really needed. Good luck, and let me know if I can help. --Duncan 01:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

French Huguenots and citizenship

Do you have a source for your edit regarding Huguenots' descendants losing the right to citizenship in 1948? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.211.4.21 (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

American Conservatism

Please do not revert it back as you did before. It is a fix of invalid move done by other user. If you revert this again you will create cross-redirect again, so please don't do it again. Also you don't need an admin to move a page to the different name. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 18:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, all the case is a little bit sad. I am not involved in the topic at all, I've just fixed that link. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 09:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bishopric vs Diocese

Good to see you want to work on this issue, in case you haven't seen it there's also a discussion at Talk:List of Roman Catholic dioceses. Though I had stumbled upon that naming chaos of the diocese and discussed about it a bit, I have been too busy with other things to actually do the work to unify those many articles. andy 12:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cologne

That article is almost entirely about the state, rather than the Archdiocese, and should stay at "Archbishopric of Cologne," or "Prince-Archbishopric of Cologne". Given that I made an argument on the talk page for why I moved it to Archbishopric, you could at least have discussed it before reverting. john k 16:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abortion article

There's some discussion here about the accuracy of the first paragraph of the abortion article, and you're invited to participate.Ferrylodge 19:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Syn2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Syn2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Forumtitelblad.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Forumtitelblad.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity

Hello Isolani!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 06:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Constance César Joseph Matthieu d'Agoult

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charles Constance César Joseph Matthieu d'Agoult, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Braa002 p07.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Braa002 p07.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Breskens.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Breskens.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Isolani! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 13 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Hermann Heller (legal scholar) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ledderose.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ledderose.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:22, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torenbreskens2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Torenbreskens2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agostino Novello was born in Tarano , not in Termini , Sicily

Hello Isolani,

Some years ago i tried to verify the different places of born of Agostino Novello. I got this message from the librarian of the Augustinian order :

uw vraag over Augustinus is mij doorgegeven, omdat ik Nederlander ben. Ik heb pater Carlos Alonso geraadpleegd. Hij is Spanjaard, en heeft zijn leven lang de geschiedenis van de Orde bestudeerd en daarin les gegeven. Hij wist van de twee standpunten rond de geboorteplaats. Augustinus Novellus is geboren in Tarano, bij Rieti. Zijn lichaam is naar Sicilie overgebracht, en de Sicilianen beweren dat hij daar geboren is. Maar volgens hem, Carlos Alonso, steunt dat niet op betrouwbare bronnen, maar op pogingen om hem Siciliaan te maken. De betrouwbare bronnen geven alleen Tarano aan.

Met hartelijke groet, Wim Sleddens OSA

Could you please correct it?

Hartelijk dank,

Peter Ribbens —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.163.58.213 (talk) 16:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Some simple help needed on the new papabili list

If you have the time and the possibility the new List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave WP article could need some help. You could start by taking a look at the talk page. Thanks Pgarret (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hervormdekerkanna.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Hervormdekerkanna.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Survey

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at m:Research:Wikipedia + Politics.

The survey link is: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXOHLbXwbpfYC1f?Q_DL=e3DsAymc9y4ljrD_eXOHLbXwbpfYC1f_MLRP_0okoOO9E3l6oIO9&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 22:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VfD