Jump to content

User talk:JTSomers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for Image:Beforeanimals.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Beforeanimals.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wikipediare.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hyde-eric-b.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:38, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

[1] This wasn't a good edit. Avoid doing that again. Gimmetrow 01:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Nelly Furtado. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. — ^.^ [citation needed] 12:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise, for the life of me I cannot see the relevance of a link about Eric Burdon to Michael Jackson, and I am about to revert all your additions. Please don't waste my time again. --Rodhullandemu 12:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Singing, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well potentially being penalized by search engines. --Rodhullandemu 12:21, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Rodhullandemu 12:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:People mentioned by Eric Burdon

[edit]

I have nominated Category:People mentioned by Eric Burdon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. The Real Libs-speak politely 22:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Cream (band). Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you.  – iridescent 22:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Amy Winehouse. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  – iridescent 22:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Burdon

[edit]

You do not seem to have learned from your last block. I'll make it plain to you: the next time you add an irrelevant link to an article, you can kiss your privilege of editing here goodbye. Permanently. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu 22:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop spamming now

[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Tom Cruise, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 22:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Eric Burdon songs

[edit]

I have nominated Category:Eric Burdon songs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Rodhullandemu 23:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Eric Burdon Bootleg discography

[edit]

I have nominated Eric Burdon Bootleg discography, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Burdon Bootleg discography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. The Real Libs-speak politely 17:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC) The Real Libs-speak politely 17:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits{{#if:|, such as the one you made to Lonely Avenue, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Power Company (song)

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Power Company (song), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/Power-Company-lyrics-The-Animals/890E335001D5FB0348256C460020411B. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Burdonandwarlive.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 09:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Price Alan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hilton.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 15:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

[edit]

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 15:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:EricBurdon Soul.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image source problem with Image:Animals.jpg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Animals.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect Como Sle Llama Mama

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Como Sle Llama Mama, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Como Sle Llama Mama is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Como Sle Llama Mama, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image source problem with Image:2008inRAH.jpg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:2008inRAH.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 14:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:EBwar.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:EBwar.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:EBwar2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:EBwar2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Animals83.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Animals83.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Doreen Caulker

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Doreen Caulker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 22:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Athens Traffic Live

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Athens Traffic Live, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ericburdon.com/index.php?id=athens_traffic. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Athens Traffic Live

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Athens Traffic Live requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scapler (talk) 16:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Burdon48916509.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Devil Run

[edit]

The article Devil Run has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct; I mistakenly saw the article as qualifying for speedy deletion on criterion A9, when clearly the artist exists. I have restored the article, with tags noting hte issues that remain. If, as you say, there is charting of this song, we need to find appropriate sourcing for it, or it could still be deleted later as a non-notable song of an otherwise notable musician. This is not a speedy deletion criteria, so the process would have to go through prodding or the Articles for Deletion process. My apologies again for not reviewing the article more closely. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
According to what you've just added to the article, this song is a mere cover of the original, from an album that is not notable enough to have its own article. The song should be credited to John Bundrick with covers by crawler and Eric Burdon. It should not be credited to Burdon as he did not write it. Also, its notability has not yet been established. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm "someone else." I'm asking about the notability. I've been here a while, and I'm an administrator, so it's within my purview to ask about such things -- even though it is within any Wikipedian's purview. I will add a "working" template to the article, but if you cannot come up with references to cite for its independent notability, it may be deleted. We do not wait until a convenient time for you to add references supporting notability. Every Wikipedian has the right to question the notability, or any other facet of compliance to our standards, at any time, until such proof is provided. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please review guidelines regarding notability for songs

[edit]

Every Eric Burdon song does not merit notability. Please review the content of this link - Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Albums.2C_singles_and_songs, especially this part:

"Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album."

I am redirecting per guidelines

Thank You --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reading this and applying it to your work. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Comeback project

[edit]

I have nominated Category:Comeback project (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Cross Store

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you created Red Cross Store, but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information must be verifiable from reliable sources. Therefore, it's necessary to cite your sources so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used. Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as original research, since other editors can't verify it. Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be deleted. Guidance on how to cite your sources is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.--Unscented (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:2007burdon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rocky (song)

[edit]

I have nominated Rocky (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocky (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've also nominated many other of the Eric Burdon song pages you created. FYI. They are included in the same AFD entry. Thanks. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Starportraitcover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of File:Burdon1975.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Burdon1975.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Burdon1975.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Burdon as punk rock?

[edit]

That's a funny edit, even for you. Eric must be very proud of your efforts. Have you ever thought of starting Burdonpedia? --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wether B (talk) 17:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Downunder Tour 2001

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Downunder Tour 2001, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No Notability through reliable third-party sources

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page 2009 swine flu outbreak do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 08:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to 2009 swine flu outbreak, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 18:04, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:2007burdon.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:2007burdon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Radiant chains (talk) 07:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:EricBurdonHollywood.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:EricBurdonHollywood.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Ebcomeback.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ebcomeback.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:WardNielsen.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:WardNielsen.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Eric_burdon_-_survivor.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Eric_burdon_-_survivor.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Devil Run

[edit]

The article Devil Run has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing established to meet notability for songs

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello JTSomers! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Red Young - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Danny McCulloch - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Barry Jenkins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

tremors 5 update

[edit]

I've found alot of new information, and I've prepared sources, so all you have to do is post this in the article, Tremors V: The Thunder from Down Under. Yes, these all have to due with the information I placed each one by. 


{{Infobox_Film
|name=Tremors 5: The Thunder From Down Under
|image= 
|caption=
|director=[[S.S. Wilson]]
|producer=[[Ron Underwood]]<br />[[Brent Maddock]]<ref>http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=10906</ref>
|writer='''Characters:'''<br>[[S.S. Wilson]]<br>[[Brent Maddock]]<br>[[Ron Underwood]]
|starring=[[Michael Gross (actor)|Michael Gross]]<br>[[Kevin Bacon]]<br>[[Fred Ward]]<br>[[Paul Hogan]]<br>[[Christopher Lloyd]]<br>[[Robert Jayne]]<br>
|music= 
|cinematography= 
|editing= 
|country=[[United States]], [[Australia]]
|distributor=[[Universal Studios]]
|studio=[[Stampede Entertainment]]
|released=25 December 2010
|runtime= 
|language=[[English language|English]]
| budget= 
| preceded_by= ''[[Tremors 4: The Legend Begins]]''
| followed_by=
|imdb_id = 1345730
|}}

'''Tremors: The Thunder From Down Under''' is the fifth movie in the ''[[Tremors (film)|Tremors]]'' series to be released in late [[December 2010]]. According to many websites and to [[IMDb]], [[Michael Gross (actor)|Michael Gross]] will star as well as [[Kevin Bacon]] and [[Fred Ward]].

It is rumoured that both [[Paul Hogan]] and [[Christopher Lloyd]] will be joining the cast, the latter reprising his role as Cletus from [[Tremors: The Series]], along with several other characters from the series.

==Cast==
*[[Fred Ward]] ... [[Earl Bassett]]<ref>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1345730</ref>
*[[Michael Gross]] ... [[Burt Gummer]]<ref>http://www.sherdog.net/forums/f48/tremors-thunder-down-under-971286/</ref>
*[[Kevin Bacon]] ... Valentine 'Val' McKee
*Victor Browne ... Tyler Reed
*Gladise Jimenez ... Rosalita Sanchez
*[[Marcia Strassman]] ... Nancy Sterngood
*[[Tinsley Grimes]] ... Mindy Sterngood
*[[Robert Jayne]] ... Melvin Plugg
*[[Lela Lee]] ... Jodi Chang
*[[Dean Norris]] ... W.D. Twitchell
*[[J.D. Walsh]] ... Larry Norvel
*[[Christopher Lloyd]] ... Cletus Poffenburger
*Sarah Rafferty ... Dr. Casey Matthews
*[[Branscombe Richmond]] ... Harlowe Winnecuma
*[[Paul Hogan]]


== Background ==

It is confirmed that the film will set in [[Australia]]<ref>http://www.horror-movies.ca/horror_13405.html</ref>. The film is a [[direct-to-video]] production and will release worldwide in December 2010 on DVD by [[Universal Home Entertainment]].

No production stills or promotion pictures were released yet.

All that is known about the plot is Burt, Earl and Val are going to austrailia, but the reason why is unknown, but is possibly to hunt Graboids, Shriekers and Ass-Blasters. Tremors 5 is to feature Assblasters congregate in special geologic areas, each laying a single egg.<ref>http://www.stampede-entertainment.com/faq/faq.php?category_id=7&cat_name=Questions about Tremors 5</ref><ref>http://www.stampede-entertainment.com/faq/faq.php?answer=53&cat_name=General Questions about Tremors&category_id=2#53</ref>

== External links ==

*{{imdb title|id=1345730|title=Tremors V: The Thunder from Down Under}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}

{{Tremors}}
{{Ron Underwood}}

[[Category:Tremors (franchise)]]
[[Category:2010s horror films]]
[[Category:Monster movies]]
[[Category:Direct-to-video films]]
[[Category:2010 films]]


Just copy and paste this in the place of the current source, with this verified one.--71.97.190.192 (talk) 01:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Mirage project

[edit]

Category:Mirage project, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Eric Burdon European Tour 2009

[edit]

The article The Eric Burdon European Tour 2009 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, unsourced concert tour fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR that has been tagged for almost six years as being unreferenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 05:08, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, JTSomers. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mirage (Eric Burdon album)

[edit]
Notice

The article Mirage (Eric Burdon album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JTSomers&oldid=1155393058"