User talk:Janetted

Spam in Canada House Gallery Banff

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Canada House Gallery Banff, by Jac16888 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Canada House Gallery Banff is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Canada House Gallery Banff, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Canada House Gallery Banff itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Donna Jo Massie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rackabello 21:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nixie Barton

A page you created, Nixie Barton, has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion on my talk page or alternatively on the Deletion Review page. However, it seems that your page is not compatible with our guidelines and the deletion will probably be endorsed.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- lucasbfr ^talk 23:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Terry McCue

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Terry McCue. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.canadahouse.com/dynamic/artists/Terry_McCue.asp in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Terry McCue with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Terry McCue with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Terry McCue saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Euryalus 05:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues

Hi. I have also tagged Grant Leier, Bill Brownridge, Roger D Arndt and Don Li-Leger and as potential copyright violations, because the text is directly taken from the canadahouse page for these artists. If you are the copyright holder or have permission, please advise on the talk page. If not, you may want to consider rewriting the text so it contains essentially the same information but in your own words. This may well avoid the copyright issue and allow this material to remain in Wikipedia. Euryalus 05:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]