User talk:Jansafronov
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:58.105.58.254. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Your recent editing history at Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
April 2023
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Hello, Jansafronov, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Disgustingtranny (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)- And let's not discount the now deleted personal attacks-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)