User talk:Jkta97

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Men in Black (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Saturday Night Live (season 37)‎. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acps110 ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saturday Night Live cast members, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Acps110 ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 4, 2012: Welcome from Gareth Griffith-Jones

Hello, Jkta97, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 15:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

-- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 15:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. When you recently edited Stella Kowalski, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mary Mills and Ruth Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

100 Quotes

I've restored the links in the table at AFI's 100 Years...100 Movie Quotes. Repeated links are okay in tables if they are "useful," which I think they are in this table. I tried to use some of the other changes you made (linking HAL, for example), but might have missed something.

Also, it would be very useful if you would use Edit summaries so we can easily understand what changes you made.

--John (User:Jwy/talk) 15:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be courteous to your fellow editors and use Edit summaries. And the 100 Movie Quotes article uses the quotes as AFI had them (and mentions how they vary from the movies). You can see the edit summaries indicating this on the history page. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 03:16, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Taxi Driver does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 21:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries and sources

Before readding your "art film" claim to the Taxi Driver article, which you have now added twice with no explanation, you need to cite a source that backs this claim, and you need to use edit summaries to explain your edits. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 21:45, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Taxi Driver. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 23:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Method acting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Group Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Meryl Streep, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Webclient101 (talk) 00:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Deer Hunter with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Trusilver 00:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Deer Hunter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Savage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Chinatown (1974 film)

I have reverted your edits to this article because you did not bother to offer an explanation for them. Your utter refusal to use edit summaries gives the impression that you have no respect for your fellow editors. From now on, I am going to revert, on sight, every edit you make that lacks an edit summary. It is time for you to begin explaining your edits and using article talk pages to explain your changes. Otherwise, I must simply assume you intend to be disruptive. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 21:44, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Redfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Canvassing (Parks and Recreation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Department of Parks and Recreation

Pilot (Parks and Recreation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Department of Parks and Recreation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Boys' Club (Parks and Recreation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Responsibility

The Graduate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Katherine Ross

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edits

Expanding on what I said above, since you obviously ignored my message, your recent edits have been, in a word, disastrous. Your expansion of plot summaries, often well beyond the limits defined by MOS, and your utter refusal to use plot summaries, respond to talk page posts, or use article talk pages, lead me to the conclusion that you have no intention of being a constructive editor. That being the case, I am forced to take action to attempt to bring your editing under control. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 01:35, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior is being discussed here. You are encouraged to join the discussion. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 01:50, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While your efforts are appreciated in developing the film articles, they need to be consistent with MOS:FILM. One of the guidelines on there advise that plot summaries should be 400–700 words. Your edits conflicted with the guidelines so have been reverted, and this just wastes your time and that of the editor who cleans up afterwards. If you have any questions ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Betty Logan (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lindafiorentinomib.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lindafiorentinomib.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to The Graduate, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Do you EVER mark any of your edits as something other than minor? — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 03:47, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Graduate, you may be blocked from editing. This is way too much detail for this plot summary, which should be—after all—a synopsis, not a retelling. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 03:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Little Big Man (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please also STOP marking all your edits "minor". — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 04:18, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Serpico. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 04:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Miracle Worker (1962 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also, once again, this is NOT a "minor" edit. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 04:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Graduate, you may be blocked from editing. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 05:12, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Streetcar Named Desire (play), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conflict (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

STOP marking all of your edits as minor

STOP marking all of your edits as minor. It is dishonest, deceptive, and rude to other editors. Read WP:MINOR. I will be following all of your edits for the next few weeks. If you continue to mark edits minor that do not conform to WP:MINOR, you will be blocked from editing. Cresix (talk) 00:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Henceforth, every edit that you incorrectly mark as minor, I am reverting without explanation. Then if you continue to do so, you will be blocked. This is your final warning. Cresix (talk) 00:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Donald Sutherland, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. In addition, you added WAY too much detail to some areas, over-linked others and added unnecessary spaces after period (full stop) characters. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 01:23, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP making disruptive edits!

Please STOP:

Adding an extra space after a period (full stop) character
Over-linking articles
Making huge numbers of edits where two or three will suffice (use the Preview button!)
Marking your edits minor when they obviously are not
Changing large portions of an article's text without adding an Edit Summary or Talk page entry to tell everyone else what you're doing
Expanding film plot summaries way beyond the stated limit (see WP:FILMPLOT); it's a summary, after all, not an exegesis

In short, your behavior is rude and inconsiderate, and is detrimental to this encyclopedia project. Will you please STOP before this escalates into something requiring Administrator action? So far, you seem to be ignoring everyone who attempts to discuss this with you, which only serves to piss people off. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 01:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stanley Kubrick, you may be blocked from editing. I normally would not consider addition of an unneeded heading "vandalism", but you 1) marked it Minor when it clearly is not, 2) failed to explain what you were doing or why, and 3) steadfastly refuse to talk to anyone about your actions, in any venue. I'm beginning to believe you are one of those insidious vandals that gets off on damaging the encyclopedia by making small, innocuous edits that stand a good chance of not being noticed for long periods of time. Please stop! — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 22:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death of a Salesman (1985 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State of Mind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Play It Again, Sam (1972 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cresix (talk) 00:10, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

British English

In a recent edit to the page Peter Sellers, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 01:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks

Please stop making piped links such as this: [[Child prodigy|child prodigy]]. It's utterly pointless. Click Child prodigy and see where it goes. Now click child prodigy and see where it goes. To the exact same page, without a redirect. Cresix (talk) 01:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

STOP removing red links

STOP removing red links as you did in this edit. Red links serve the purpose of encouraging article creation. You are being disruptive and will be blocked if you continue. Cresix (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useless pipe links, AGAIN

You have already been warned. Henceforth, if you continue making useless pipe links, such as [[Sleeve gun|sleeve gun]], I am reverting every edit you make to that page. Then if you continue, you will be blocked. Cresix (talk) 16:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING: Unsourced edits

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Play It Again, Sam (1972 film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 00:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Annie Hall, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 03:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Second and FINAL warning: STOP removing red links

STOP removing red links as you did in this edit. Red links serve the purpose of encouraging article creation. You are being disruptive and will be blocked if you continue. Cresix (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]