Jump to content

User talk:Jkudlick/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 3    Archive 4   
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  ... (up to 100)


AFD Snow keeps

Thanks for doing the close. Just as you did the Gold Cup ones, I was working on a half-hour edit, that I got an edit conflict for - so I've added one of them anyhow. Also you didn't remove the AFD notice from the articles! Thanks again Nfitz (talk) 22:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nfitz: Working on removing the AFD notices now. Glad to help! — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Nfitz (talk) 22:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just became aware of this because of a post on my talk page by Nfitz. Announcing those AfDs at your project and then snow NAC closing them is absolutely unacceptable. --Randykitty (talk) 08:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Randykitty: I did not announce any of those AFDs at WT:FOOTY, nor was I involved in either the AFDs or the articles in question in any way, shape, or form before I performed my analysis. I presume that then means I was WP:UNINVOLVED, but if you still have a problem with the closures or my actions you can file at WP:DRV and WP:ANI. The issue at hand with those closures seems to be that a reviewer would leave feedback that an article required improvement on an editor's talk page or with canned edit summaries, but nothing was left on the article's talk page for any subsequent editor to understand what was happening. There is also an ANI discussion after which the reviewer claims that the only resolution for a disputed redirect or draftification is AFD with no other attempts at obtaining consensus, which seems to run completely at odds with WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The AfDs were announced here and snow closing it within a day without giving other editors than those participating in the project the chance to comment is bad practice. On top of that, you NAC closed these. If you continue do this kind of thing, you'll most certainly will end up at ANI. I strongly recommend that you undo your closures. --Randykitty (talk) 16:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Randykitty: As I said, I was UNINVOLVED and DRV and ANI are available for you if you wish. I stand by my actions and I am prepared to defend them. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's nothing wrong with announcing AFD at a project, as per guidelines, User:Randykitty! Under WP:CANVASSING, section WP:APPNOTE notes that editors CAN can place a message at "The talk page or noticeboard of one or more WikiProjects or other Wikipedia collaborations which may have interest in the topic under discussion". Why don't you think that applies? Nfitz (talk) 23:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2023

WikiProject Scouting | July 2023


Notes for July
  • On our To do list, we need to prioritize some tasks for articles outside of the US or the UK.
Announcements for the benefit of all
Other ways to participate

--evrik (talk)



Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 16:41, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Qatar inclusion in the AFC U23 Qualifiers

here https://twitter.com/afcasiancup/status/1700328191121150320 a tweet of matchday 2 fixtures by the AFC which include Qatar vs Myanmar as a match of the Qualifiers even if their result didn't count Lunar Spectrum96 (talk) 03:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Côte d'Ivoire," listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Côte d'Ivoire, has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § Côte d'Ivoire, until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles. I saw that you participated in a discussion on a similar topic. Sunnya343 (talk) 18:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Metallica

Please do not accept genre changes without talk page consensus. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 20:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: Wilco. Thanks for the advice. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 22:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 23:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection

Yo. Thanks for confirming the C. J. Stroud edits. I'm not too sure on who to ask about this but do you know where I could apply to become a pending changes reviewer? HappyBoi3892 (talk) 01:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HappyBoi3892: You can request additional permissions at WP:PERM. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 01:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luke Brennan (soccer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Congratulations on being among the top five most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job! – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits from a user with an ID adress

Hi, there's a user with an ID adress who has made several changes across pages, especially, related to qualifications to football tournaments at the 2024 Olympics : this user : 2806:2A0:1520:816A:0:0:0:6A36. I see that you have reverted several of their edits but there are more : like this one on the Football at the 2024 Summer Olympics : this one. Do you think we should keep their edits ? I thnink that's a pity that they delete the images of the stadias, but what your opinion ? Pindrice (talk) 07:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This ID adress too 2806:2A0:1520:816A:0:0:0:9EDC : they are the same person. Pindrice (talk) 07:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pindrice: I saw the edit on the Summer Olympics article but did not revert at the time because I was in the middle of something else. I see you have reverted, but if such edits continue I will escalate at the user's talk page and WP:RFPP. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jkudlick: : Sorry to bother you with that but I have another question. The user ShopperSignal78 removed all the redirects for 2030 FIFA World Cup qualification (CAF), 2030 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF), 2030 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONMEBOL), 2030 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA), 2030 FIFA World Cup qualification (OFC) and 2030 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC) : isn't it way too early for that ? I mean, the 2026 qualifications for some part of the World has still not begun... so I find very premature to deal with 2030 yet.
Pindrice (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pindrice: It is far too early for this. I'll revert. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFC U-23 Asian Cup Stadium Listings (Thanks for cleaning up)

Cheers for Cleaning up the Stadium Listings. I changed the stadium list so that it was the correct stadium but thanks for doing the rest Wycombefan (talk) 10:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Self-Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

I have been trouted for: not performing my due diligence before slapping a template on an IP editor for performing what was actually a good faith attempt to fix something. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I noticed you warned an IP address for unconstructive edits to Bill Murray. He has continued to violate BLP policy since you left that warning. A.FLOCK (talk) 02:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That IP has been blocked now. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 02:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry, I didn't intend to ruin the page by removing the links

I'm so sorry I didn't intend to ruin the page by removing the links, in addition I have checked the words limit on the site Word Counter and the site had marked exactly 699 words when I have translate from italian-english (USA) how can I let the edits pass? Crystal890 (talk) 01:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Mr./Mrs. Jkudlick

Good evening Mr./Mrs. Jkudlick I noticed that you cancelled my edit to the Sonic X season 1 summary, could you please tell me what is wrong with my adjustment? This time I followed the maximum allowed word limit guidelines( it is 699 words I have double checked) and did not put incitements to violence is it possible to try to fix it together explaining to me where I went wrong this time please? Crystal890 (talk) 01:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Crystal890: I'm not sure where you saw a word limit to your edits, but I have personally made edits including well over 1,000 words. I would suggest that you seek consensus for your proposed change at Talk:Sonic X. The changes you are proposing remove links to other Wikipedia articles without providing a reason why you are removing them. They also appear, at least to me, to change the context of the summary. Getting assistance from other experienced editors will help you learn the editing policies and guidelines. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 01:38, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can I try again and put particularly attention to don't eliminate the links please? Crystal890 (talk) 01:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Crystal890: Yes, you may try again. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 02:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Visa policy of Russia

Hello ! Why did you delete my edit ? I explained why I deleted outdated information . Please restore my edit . Thank you . 94.243.68.113 (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Congratulations on being among the top five most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 06:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

goalscorers at 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC second round

Do you know how to fix the error message on the goalscoring section ? I can't reconcile when i look at the associated module : Module:Goalscorers/data/2026 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC) ;

Lua error in Module:Goalscorers at line 616: attempt to compare string with nil.

Matilda Maniac (talk) 06:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be fixed now. Matilda Maniac (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiverse

I noticed you just reverted a pending change to this article but did not leave a reason. I was looking at the same pending change and wonder what your reasons were. I would probably have also rejected the edit:

the first two citations seem to be a circular reference to a Wikipedia.de article (according to a reviewer at the cited source host website)
all references are to primary sources rather than to scholarly critical sources.

When reverting a pending change, especially cited text, I think it important to give feedback to the contributor. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 23:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC) —[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2024

WikiProject Scouting | May 2024


Notes for May:

Some important articles that need help: The Scout Association, NAYLE, Philmont Training Center, BSA Leadership Training, COPE

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) May 22, 2024

Some bubble tea for you!

Thank you for accepting Pending Changes, I'm always too scared to do big changes. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 20:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'm new to Wikipedia. C is clearly a a compiled language be definition. A compiled language is typically compiled. There is not a single source on the internet ( including Wikipedia ) that would disagree with this fact. I don't understand why my edits are rejected. These rejections appear to be virtual territorialism via sock accounts with no basis in reality and are slowing the refinement of Wikipedia. If I am missing something please let me know. Chris.temp.level.0 (talk) 14:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris.temp.level.0: After your edit was reverted, the correct course of action at that point was to discuss your requested change at Talk:C (programming language) and seek consensus from other experienced editors. I probably would have accepted your proposed edit if it had not already been reverted, but the WP:BRD process is strongly encouraged after an initial reversion. I hope this helps. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 15:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will attempt to to do what you suggest. I am seeking truth here; if I can't make minor obvious edits simply; I would like to understand why, I will try to get some traction with the link you provided, Thank you! Chris.temp.level.0 (talk) 16:09, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2015 CONCACAF Gold Cup group table templates

A tag has been placed on Category:2015 CONCACAF Gold Cup group table templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jkudlick/Archive_4&oldid=1259167794"