User talk:JohnChrysostom/ArXiv03
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:JohnChrysostom. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for commentonWikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Genesis creation narrative
You mentioned on Talk that you're doing something "complete re-write". Where is it? Can I see? Don't have much time these days but I'm curious.PiCo (talk) 06:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- The whole thing. Just curious to see how another pair of eyes see the same subject :). Remember Cicero: "Keep-a it-a simple" (he was Italin, you know).PiCo (talk) 07:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- He was Mario, yes. Mario's great-something grandad. If it's a new article you could just do it, then invite ppl to look. PiCo (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
RfC: Should the lede define the narrative as a "myth, in the academic sense"?
An RfC has been created at Genesis creation narrative#RfC: Should the lede define the narrative as a "myth" in the academic sense"?. Since you have been involved in this discussion, I'm informing you about it here. This is not an attempt to canvass, because people on both sides of the dispute are being notified. - Lisa (talk - contribs) 16:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Alicia Gorey
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for commentonTalk:Alicia Gorey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. —RFC bot(talk) 23:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Salafi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Legalism and Literalist
- Christian fundamentalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Virgin Birth
- Hellenization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hellenism
- Muslim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Surah
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot(talk) 10:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Birth date and age
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment onTemplate talk:Birth date and age. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. —RFC bot (talk) 00:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Interpretations of Genesis
Stumbled across this article Allegorical interpretations of Genesis which might be the sort of thing you're looking at. I must say I wouldn't touch it myself - too many ill-informed but highly-motivated editors, likely to be a vale of sorrow :) PiCo (talk) 06:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Tone
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Tone. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Your input is requested
As an editor who seems to understand the topic contained in the Old Testament article, could you please take the time to add your opinion at Talk:Old Testament#Hashem sfarim's additions? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| For your diligent attempts to collaborate on Genesis creation narrative. Your willingness to work in good faith with other editors is really appreciated! — Jess· Δ♥ 02:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you - and I was always told I didn't work well in teams, because, y'know, there is no letter "i" in "team"! St John Chrysostom view/my bias 02:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
 |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Summa contra Gentiles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to St. and Aristotelian
- Mohammedan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Boy Scouts
- Ritualism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Born again
- Summa Theologica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Catholic Bible
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Newcastle United F.C.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Newcastle United F.C.. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Biased much?
Thanks for the ad hominem attack here. It's touching that you reluctantly agree though.--Jeffro77 (talk) 12:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- I apologize if I caused offense. It was sarcasm based on the same statement that Mann_jess made to me in the Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Requesting_three_admins_to_close_long_RfC (I don't know how to do a diff, search for "I'm afraid I have to agree") which you were involved in, and I believed you saw - I will redact it or strike it if you wish. St John Chrysostom view/my bias 12:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think it was obvious that it was intended as sarcasm, but fair enough.
- See Wikipedia:Diff#Linking to a diff.--Jeffro77 (talk) 12:25, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- here is the diff. I have struck the comment in any case and replaced it with a simple "I agree with Jeffro (no offense intended: see talk)" - I was actually trying (and failing, obviously) to dispel some of the caustic and acrimonious atmosphere at that page with a leaven of levity - I am half-horrified that I managed to cause offense/have myself construed as an ad hominer (as if my limited skill in logic and rhetoric was that limited) instead. St John Chrysostom view/my bias 12:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was not actually aware of the section at the Admin Noticeboard.--Jeffro77 (talk) 12:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- No wonder you took it poorly. I took it as an unintended (yet funny) ad hom myself when it was said to me. I assumed that, as one of the most vigorous opponents of "keep", you would have been involved in it deeply. (I should do a better job of checking signatures?) St John Chrysostom view/my bias 12:34, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- I saw references to a request for a 3 admin close at the article Talk page, but I imagined such a request would be fairly routine—there either would or would not be a 3 admin close—so I didn't bother investigating. To be honest, I thought that the relevant policies were sufficient to approve the rename (and still believe that to be the case), however there comes a point where, at least for a time, the dead horse should be left alone. "No consensus" means just that, no one 'won' or 'lost'. At least it now properly has both terms in the opening sentence though. I trust you have no major objection to the change I've made?--Jeffro77 (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- What? Changing "symbolic narrative" to "narrative" and removing "peopled"? Not at all - although I imagine the addition of "Genesis creation myth" in bold letters will piss off enough people to get reverted at least once (as it did when I made the same BRD edit, less the piped link, the first time), so we should get to work building consensus for both terms, bold, in the lead. I figured it was a good consensus-building move as a compromise due to the "no consensus" - "why don't we just put both up there"? St John Chrysostom view/my bias 13:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Based on the relevant policy, and especially since there was no consensus for preferring one term over the other, I see no defensible precedent for not retaining Genesis creation myth in the opening sentence.--Jeffro77 (talk) 13:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Eek! Sorry if I caused any trouble, guys. Communicating in text with people from different cultures can be tricky :P I'm glad you both seem to have worked it out! — Jess· Δ♥ 18:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Based on the relevant policy, and especially since there was no consensus for preferring one term over the other, I see no defensible precedent for not retaining Genesis creation myth in the opening sentence.--Jeffro77 (talk) 13:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- What? Changing "symbolic narrative" to "narrative" and removing "peopled"? Not at all - although I imagine the addition of "Genesis creation myth" in bold letters will piss off enough people to get reverted at least once (as it did when I made the same BRD edit, less the piped link, the first time), so we should get to work building consensus for both terms, bold, in the lead. I figured it was a good consensus-building move as a compromise due to the "no consensus" - "why don't we just put both up there"? St John Chrysostom view/my bias 13:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- I saw references to a request for a 3 admin close at the article Talk page, but I imagined such a request would be fairly routine—there either would or would not be a 3 admin close—so I didn't bother investigating. To be honest, I thought that the relevant policies were sufficient to approve the rename (and still believe that to be the case), however there comes a point where, at least for a time, the dead horse should be left alone. "No consensus" means just that, no one 'won' or 'lost'. At least it now properly has both terms in the opening sentence though. I trust you have no major objection to the change I've made?--Jeffro77 (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- No wonder you took it poorly. I took it as an unintended (yet funny) ad hom myself when it was said to me. I assumed that, as one of the most vigorous opponents of "keep", you would have been involved in it deeply. (I should do a better job of checking signatures?) St John Chrysostom view/my bias 12:34, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- I apologize if I caused offense. It was sarcasm based on the same statement that Mann_jess made to me in the Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Requesting_three_admins_to_close_long_RfC (I don't know how to do a diff, search for "I'm afraid I have to agree") which you were involved in, and I believed you saw - I will redact it or strike it if you wish. St John Chrysostom view/my bias 12:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I completely understand that this edit is basically a running gag now, but given the discontent some of the other editors have expressed about my edits at that page, due to misplaced concerns of POV, it probably isn't great. As it is, I've decided not to work on that article anymore, because it's become too difficult trying to work with the other editors there.--Jeffro77 (talk) 10:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
More AN/I fun
Here it is. Kauffner (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- Responded to. No personal offense was meant, merely "shock and awe" after the last RfM and RfCs, and high emotions from the WP:BATTLEGROUND of that article, which, sadly, boiled over (i.e. straw, meet back of camel) when the very first source you provided I checked defined it as "creation myth" in the very first sentence. I apologize again for any personal offense, slight, or anything that could be construed as an ad hominem. St John Chrysostom Δόξατω Θεώ 01:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Editing environment
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Editing environment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:16, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Judaeo-Christian Creation
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. St John Chrysostom Δόξατω Θεώ 05:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Frasier Crane
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frasier Crane. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Fourth Council of Constantinople (Eastern Orthodox) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Leo I
- Hindu–Islamic relations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Surah
- Motion Picture Association of America film rating system (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Second Gulf War
- Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vatican
- Theistic evolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Denomination
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Deism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Deism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
I noticed your comment on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Religion#Seven_Point_Counter_Proposal. There is currently a dispute on the exodus that we could use your assistance on. Please take a look, and comment on the talk page (Talk:The_Exodus#What_kind_of_.22Exodus.22_is_this.3F)Quarkgluonsoup (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Texas Revolution
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Texas Revolution. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)