User talk:Jonathan Harold Koszeghi/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Grey's Anatomy

Lorin Schonfeld, you need to stop adding unsourced, overdetailed information to every Grey's Anatomy page. You're edits have been reverted by me and several other editors which indicate your wrongdoing. You also are removing verified statements. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write every unsourced statement you want and remove what you don't want. If you'd like to do that I'd recommend a personal blog. If you continue what you are doing you will be reported as you've received sufficient warnings. On the other hand, if you would like to contribute helpfully, your work will be appreciated. TRLIJC19 (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Complaint of edit warring at List of Grey's Anatomy episodes

Hello Lorin. A complaint about your edits has been filed at WP:AN3#User:Lorin Schonfeld reported by User:TRLIJC19 (Result: ). Since admins have to decide whether to take action on this complaint, it would be helpful if you will respond there. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:29, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Lorin Schonfeld reported by User:TRLIJC19 (Result: 24h). EdJohnston (talk) 13:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

You are NOT to add information that you want that goes against consensus. (for the second time)

Jonathan, your work at List of Grey's Anatomy episodes is appreciated, but not when you go against WP policy. You brought up the idea of removing some info from the lead to which I disagreed. At that point, consensus had not been reached. But I see that you decided to go and make your edits anyway. Not to mention this is the second time you are doing this. I thought you would've learned your lesson, since you were already blocked for going against consensus (3RR:Lorin Schonfeld), then blocked again for invading your block with a sockpuppet. (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lorin Schonfeld/Archive). And after all of this and finally getting back on track, you go and ignore WP policies again. This is ridiculous that I'm even giving you a warning and not going straight to reporting you, since you've already done this. If this happens again, you will be reported immediately, and expect a longer block. TRLIJC19 (talk) 22:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

I added a LINK! I added a link to the section, so that everyone could be happy! Not to mention that List of Lost episodes is a featured list and there is no sign of the information you want in the lead. And I believe that you should stop threatening me, and wait for other users to express their opinions. Your main goal is NOT improving Wikipedia, it is proving me that I'm wrong! I didn't want anything but to improve that artilce (List of Grey's Anatomy episodes) that you all seem to not care about at all! I don't know why I'm even trying anymore! You may go and report me. If Wikipedia is all about users like you, I must display my disappointment. I am not going to show any further interest. I just hope that there are other users who really want to help Wikipedia, unlike yourself, the one that just claims that his "ultimate goal on Wikipedia is to get Grey's Anatomy to Featured Article status." Have a wonderful day, TRLIJC19! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 09:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

A link is not what was discussed. I disagreed with your idea so that means the page stays as is until a consensus can be reached. If you wanted to compromise, you should've discussed it on the talk page first. It is nice that you want to help out Wikipedia, but you must follow these policies. Please do not think that I made these policies. They are the policies of Wikipedia agreed upon by consensus. I do not think you are grasping what the concept of consensus is. Read more into that. Please stop referring back to other featured lists as if you have some right to change this page just because of another page. Until agreed upon, your edits to the lead will be erased. If another user agrees with removing the information, and this does not mean making a sock puppet to back you up, then the information about specials will be removed. My main goal actually is to improve WP, which is why I've been trying to no use to get you to understand WP policies. You and I both know that I am in no way the only editor who sees what you do wrong. Earlier this month, when you continuously tried to add basic seasonal information, 3 other users reverted you. Then when you finally brought it up on the talk page, another user, not just me, disagreed with you. After this, when you continued to add your edits in, you were reported and an administrator who obviously saw your wrongdoing, blocked you. So it is clearly not just me. Plus, when you made a sockpuppet, everyone on Wikipedia knew what you were doing was wrong, and you were immediately blocked. Also, look at your talk page; it is filled with warnings, block notices, and complaints about you by other users, not just me. Making List of Grey's Anatomy episodes a featured list is a nice goal, but if by getting to that goal you choose to edit war, go against consensus, and make sockpuppets, then your work will not be tolerated nor appreciated. TRLIJC19 (talk) 10:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

But there is no other episode-list on Wikipedia that has that kind of information in its lead section! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

You continue to go on about how "other pages" don't include it. That's nice but other pages might not have such big specials and webisodes. The point of this is not that you are wrong, but that you have no consensus to back you up. As I've stated, if consensus has not been reached, then the page stays as is until you can get a user's opinion to back up the change. Please stop disregarding all my other statements, because it shows that your only concern is to have everything on the page, as you desire, without taking into consideration other users' opinion. The page will stay as is unless a consensus to change is reached. This is not a debate, it is WP policy. TRLIJC19 (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)