User talk:Jourdan Sayers

Nomination of Sharon Gamson Danks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharon Gamson Danks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Gamson Danks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Shiffman

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ronald Shiffman, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.beyondzuccotti.org/ron-shiffman-awarded-2012-jane-jacobs-medal/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nice start, but still needs work

I see that you have attempted to remove the copyright issue by changing a few words, but, in my opinion, the current words are still problematic.

It is not, in general, good practice to start writing an article by using copyrighted material as a starting point. The reason is that simply changing some of the words leaves the original structure of the copyrighted material, and the results, even with many words changed, may constitute a copyright violation. Wikipedia deliberately takes a conservative view toward copyright; we want to be sure that we do not have close calls. Changing words means it is no longer a simple copy paste, but it can still qualify as a Close paraphrase, which is still a problem.

When I look at the source, and the current state of the article, it is clear that the current article was written by modifying a few words in the source.

A better practice is to identify more than one reliable source about the subject, read each of the articles, then start writing the article in your own words. Then check against the sources, in case you accidentally remembered long phrases from the source, and make sure those are rewritten.--S Philbrick (Talk) 14:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Ronald Shiffman

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ronald Shiffman, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from https://www.pratt.edu/faculty_and_staff/bio/?id=rshiffma, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ronald Shiffman and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Ronald Shiffman, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ronald Shiffman with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ronald Shiffman. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ronald Shiffman saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I did of course see that Sphilbrick had edited the article; I should have guessed that the copyvio would not have gone un-noticed. I saw the problems as fairly major, and have listed the article at WP:CP for a complete rewrite from scratch. Sphilbrick, do please feel free to revert if you think I have misjudged this. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Mindy Thompson Fullilove

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mindy Thompson Fullilove, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.aia.org/press/AIAB096213, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mindy Thompson Fullilove and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Mindy Thompson Fullilove, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mindy Thompson Fullilove with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mindy Thompson Fullilove. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mindy Thompson Fullilove saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jourdan Sayers. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article New Village Press, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]