User talk:KSY3

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, KSY3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tag removal

Please stop repeatedly removing maintenance tags without fixing the issues. These tags are so that you as well as other editors can fix the issues with the article. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 20:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Punjab flotilla

A tag has been placed on Punjab flotilla, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 20:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Bach Saqa.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Bach Saqa.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 20:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Habibullah Ghazi.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Habibullah Ghazi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 20:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bach Saqa.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bach Saqa.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 20:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Durand line Agreement

A tag has been placed on Durand line Agreement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hitro talk 07:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shh

Please read this re your SHOUTING. I have fixed some of your articles, others I have userfied. Nothing of significance has been deleted. Check your contributions to see what is where. Also not that we do not have an "Introduction" section: we just fire off the article with, for example "FR Peshawar is a frontier region of …". — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

works in progress

Hi-- as long as you have a subpage that is work in progress, put the catagories in

 <!--  -->

. otherwise, your user page will be listed as a real page. thanks! Seb az86556 (talk) 04:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sahibzada Zahoor Ahmad

A tag has been placed on Sahibzada Zahoor Ahmad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Falcon8765 (talk) 23:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved a page

There was an error in a prior page move, the new page is now here: User:KSY3/Kohat. Best Regards. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:33, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Federally Administered Tribal Areas

While your contributions to this article are quite welcome, I noticed that you removed a good bit of sourced material, which I have restored here. Please do not remove sourced material without giving a valid reason in edit summary. Additionally, it would be helpful if you would supply sources to verify the information that you have added. More information on this can be read at WP:V and WP:RS. Without reliable sources to substantiate statements like "They Presents great headaches to law and order situation in NWFP cites particulary Peshawar city and capital of NWFP adjacent to FATA and in FR regions as well", the content may be removed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Your recent addition to Federally Administered Tribal Areas has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not with an image, but with the text you added. It has already been removed from the article as a copyright violation, and it cannot be restored. We can't accept text that has been previously published on the internet or elsewhere without verification from the original owner that this is free for use. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, if you are copying from other Wikipedia pages, you need to give credit to the contributors who originally wrote the material. Wikipedia is not public domain. This is usually done by supply attribution in an edit summary with a direct link to the original article and by placing the template {{copied}} on the article talk page. This is particularly helpful when the text you are placing has been previously published at publications such as [1], since if this material is published in other articles on Wikipedia, it is there in violation of copyright. However, I don't see any evidence that this material is published in other articles on Wikipedia. A search for this sentence which you added currently only hits to this article, and only because the archive has not updated. That material was at one time included in the Wikipedia article, but as its talk page indicates was removed as a copyright violation. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:14, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preview

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Federally Administered Tribal Areas, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Rrburke^(talk) 14:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia style

KSY3, I have reverted your recent edits to Federally Administered Tribal Areas because they violate a number of parts of the Wikipedia:Manual of Style including:

capitalisation of headings -- see also WP:HEAD
spelling out numbers that are ten or less -- see also WP:MOSNUM.

Also, you seem to be unfamiliar with standard English capitalisation. I suggest that you review Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters). It would help. Regards, Ground Zero | t 01:55, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sahibzada Mohmmad Shareef

The article Sahibzada Mohmmad Shareef has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Sahibzada Mohmmad Shareef – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 11:52, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sahibzada Abdul Haleef

The article Sahibzada Abdul Haleef has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Sahibzada Abdul Haleef – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 09:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suba Singh

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Suba Singh, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Lehna Singh Majithia. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christobel Taseer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christobel Taseer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 17:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of M D Taseer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on M D Taseer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:51, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated material - a better way to do this?

Hello, I see that in writing Suba Singh, Ranjit Singh and Lehna Singh Majithia (and maybe others), you seem to have reused large portions of text, and just changed the emphasis of names.

This is not a good way to write Wikipedia articles for maintainability - if someone corrects something in one place, all the other copies will not be updated, and so inconsistent information will be left lying around.

Would it be possible for you to restructure your contributions sothat, as far as possible, any given sequence of events, facts or references is described once, and all the other articles instead have a short paragraph and a link to the article where further description can be found?

This would also relieve you from the burden of dealing with the copyright flagging bots you have been seeing! --Alvestrand (talk) 12:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]