User talk:KenDavison3

Welcome!

Hello, Meditlondon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Arielle Kayabaga

I undid your edit to create a link to Arielle Kayabaga in the London, Ontario article. You've kind of got the process backwards - first establish an article for the person to establish her notability - THEN create links to the article. PK T(alk) 11:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You'll also need to be aware that city councillors in places that are not in the global city class (Toronto, Montreal, New York City, Chicago, etc.) are not automatically deemed notable just for existing. In order to establish that Arielle Kayabaga is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article at all, you will have to show her as being much, much more prominent than most other city councillors, such as by showing that she receives nationalized coverage far, far beyond just London's local media. I'm not seeing any evidence that she does, but that is the standard you would have to meet to get a city councillor in London ON considered notable enough to have an article on here. Bearcat (talk) 13:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Meditlondon", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Meditlondon. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Arielle Kayabaga, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 01:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) I'm afraid I don't understand the issue here. Arielle Kayabaga is our city Councillor. There are many articles on politicians and I used a template from another politician so that I would be using what is apparently an acceptable format. Arielle does not work for me nor has she paid me to write this article. Is she a friend? Well we've had lunch a few times but how else do I learn about a person in order to write an article? I learned about her early life through these discussions. I linked to articles/ web pages in order to back up my comments but I didn't link to my own pages. With regards to complying with policies, I have in fact read through stuff and the more I read the less I feel I can publish just about anything without breaking some rule. Meditlondon (talk) 18:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

KenDavison3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have used meditlondon as a user for years. I don't get why it's a problem NOW but I have requested a name change via the Global Rename

Accept reason:

I'm unblocking you per your agreement below and after considering the input of the blocking administrator. (Remember, you should not make any edits relating to your company without the approval of a Wikipedia administrator.) I strongly urge you to carefully consider the conflict of interest guideline – please read through it in full and contact me if you have any questions. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meditlondon (talk) 13:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is your association with the company called Med IT in London? 331dot (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner/operator of the sole proprietorship (i.e not incorporated). I have no employees and work from home. I am for all intents a self employed computer technician. Meditlondon (talk) 23:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a username "Ken Davison" registered, you will need to choose something else. You may just remove "KenDavison" and replace it with your new choice. 331dot (talk) 23:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did a username search here and it apparently isn't in use. I did a search before too. https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?search=username+search&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go&ns0=1 and also here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/KenDavison Meditlondon (talk) 01:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that "KenDavison" is not in use, but because "Ken Davison" is in use, (note the spacing) the system will not allow me to change the name as the two names are similar. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Changed to KenDavison3 Meditlondon (talk) 12:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that worked. I have changed your username from Meditlondon, and someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 13:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping with this. I wish HickoryOughtShirt?4 had tried to help me instead of just locking my account and deleting my page. KenDavison3 (talk) 13:08, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KenDavison3. It sounds like you're pretty frustrated, which I completely understand. Wikipedia can be a frustrating place because we have a lot of rules and bureaucracy to balance article quality and reliability with our open editing philosophy. If you'd like more information about some of the policies we have, this page has a lot of links to information, and once you're unblocked you'll also have access to the Teahouse, where you can ask questions and receive helpful responses from experienced editors.

In the meantime, if you agree (this will be a binding agreement) not to make edits to articles that relate to your company in any way, and can describe the kinds of edits you'll make to other articles, you'll have a good chance of being unblocked now. Let me know, and reach out if I can be of any additional help. If you'd like to withdraw your request, please also say so; we will deem this unblock request closed in a week or two without additional information. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even this is confusing :-) I filled in an appeal and stated that I won't mention my company and I agreed to not make edits related to my company. I would still like to work on our City Councillors page that I have in draft. I am also interested in scouting, Canadian politics, old air cooled VWs and modernizing old cars with electronic fuel injection. Thanks for the help KenDavison3 (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Meditlondon

The page User:Meditlondon has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I must say this is a frustrating experience. My first article about our city councilor was deleted because I copied information from her website. I am now writing if from scratch but apparently making links is spam yet I'm supposed to backup my statements. Very frustrating. There are many articles about politicians. I didn't have a user page for years but a message popped up about 'meditlondon not having a page' so I created one and talked about myself as instructed to. I am a self employed computer technician, politically active, Ontario Commissioner for BPSA and many other things. I am not being paid for this article or any other edits. 13:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC) Meditlondon (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arielle Kayabaga

Hello, KenDavison3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arielle Kayabaga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arielle Kayabaga

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arielle Kayabaga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 12:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arielle Kayabaga

You made a big deal out of getting the draft restored. I did it as a matter of urgency and you haven't touched it. This is just to let you know that I'll delete it again if you haven't made any effort to improve it within the next 48 hours. Deb (talk) 08:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I give up. I have more to do in my life than this. What a frustrating experience. Instead of support and mentorship it's deletion, deletion, deletion. I can't even figure out how to delete my own draft.

KenDavison3 (talk) 00:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there you are. I go the extra mile for you and you can't be bothered. What a waste of my time. Deb (talk) 08:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arielle Kayabaga

Hello Ken! I received your email, and thanks for reaching out.

First of all, I haven't created articles about city councillors, but I have edited some over the years. Second, I'm not an administrator on Wikipedia, so I haven't got powers that an admin would have. That having been said; I did see the article and saw that it got "speedied", so I'm glad to see that it was returned to Draft. ~~It doesn't appear to have a 48-hour time limit as far as I can tell.~~

On a quick read, it looks like a resume, which is not what Wikipedia wants. Compare Draft:Arielle Kayabaga to the article for mayor Ed Holder, as an example. Wikipedia expects articles about people who meet the Notability policies, which needs to be demonstrated by coverage of the subject in Reliable sources, and that's where I see the article about Arielle is lacking. She definitely does not meet the notability policy for politicians, being a councillor in a non-major city. The policy actually says, "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline." Note that none of the other London city councillors have articles.

The London Free Press should have some useable content about Ms. Kayabaga, I would expect.

I will add that I live in a town between Barrie and Toronto, and I've never heard of her. Given Ms. Kayabaga's history, she might qualify under the general notability guideline, but several references about her have to be found and included in her article.

Feel free to use my user talk page to communicate if you wish, or we can carry on here (which might be better). Regards, PK T(alk) 17:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. I guess there are 1 or 2 reasonable people on wikipedia. I've given up. I don't have time to update it in the next what is now 24hrs along with the further research and reading all of the guidelines. What frustrating experience the whole wiki thing has been for me. Anyways, thanks.

My pleasure. The vast majority of us are reasonable, but we have standards we do our best to abide by. I'm still not sure about the short time limit, so you might have time to find references that could help. Cheers, PK T(alk) 01:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]