User talk:Khalidmilan

Welcome!

Hello, Khalidmilan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Khalidmilan, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Khalidmilan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel de Jong

Hi, I removed your second edit because it was about his fourth goal in the season. I think that listing all the goals a player scored is mostly boring ("First he scored this goal, then he scored that goal, two matches later he scored another goal and then he scored another goal ..."). Goals should only be mentioned if they are somehow notable (e.g. being the first or in an important match). You wrote it was his fourth goal and I didn't see what would make it notable. --Jaellee (talk) 16:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 00:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at PageName, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. TJD2 (talk) 05:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to DePaul University. Jim1138 (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You left your message toward the top of my talk page. New sections should go on the bottom. See wp:talk pages. You removed the asterisks which formatted the sections resulting in a long run-on paragraph. You did not leave any wp:edit summary explaining why.

The discussion is on Talk:DePaul University, not your talk page. Please discuss there. Remember to sign your talk with four tildes which is automatically converted to links to your talk & user pages and a time stamp "~~~~" Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help Khalidmilan (talk) 07:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]