User talk:Killpetersalovey

September 2023

Hello, I'm Gobonobo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Robert Solow have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 00:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Nordhaus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 00:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sterling Professor, you may be blocked from editing. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 00:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pierson College. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 00:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Copying text from Ted Kaczynski to various pages without attribution. Eyesnore ^talk💬 00:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sharon Oster. Stop copying text from the Ted Kaczynski article and pasting it into that article without attribution. Eyesnore ^talk💬 00:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To the blocking admin @Zzuuzz: Since you have CheckUser capabilities, you should convert your standard admin action block to a CheckUser block ({{Checkuserblock-account}}) since I compared the user contributions side-by-side between Killpetersalovey (talk · contribs) and Petersalovey (talk · contribs) and saw similar editing patterns: copied text from the Ted Kaczynski article. Eyesnore ^talk💬 00:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eyesnore: Yes it's the same user, there are plenty of other accounts, and I can hereby declare it's a CU block. No sane admin is going to be lifting this block though in any case. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]