User talk:Kirbytime/Archive 1

Good luck! -Chairman S. 23:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spiderman
You have been spotted climbing the Reichstag building dressed as Spiderman. At least one editor has reported this behavior as being in relation to a content dispute. As clearly stated in WP:NCR, you may not climb the Reichstag building dressed as Spiderman in order to campaign over a content dispute. This is your last warning. If you climb any further up, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please do not erase this warning. Doing so is considered vandalism.

My revert of your user page

Yeah, I was 85% sure that was the case, but because the entry was personal information, and because of the reference to "Big Brother," I thought that perhaps someone was harassing you, and figured you could always revert it again if it was just that you hadn't logged in. See you round, JDoorj a m Talk 04:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

though your edit was minor, it makes me look like less of an idiot and i appreciate it fellow iranian. thanks. also in personal messages i don't really care about capitalization but in my user page i guess it makes sense.Amirman 04:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfulfilled Christian prophecy

Thanks for your vote! However, please note that the current third round of voting is much, much farther down the page, almost at the end. Please return and register your vote there. Here's a link. Talk:Timeline_of_unfulfilled_Christian_Prophecy Fortunately, the alternative you chose is still in the running. Best regards... Tex 12:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I told SurfDog.

Censorship is wrong. unsigned comment by User_talk:68.45.21.137

Not on Wikipedia Kirbytime 22:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

albatross

vandals keep inserting real-life personal info of wikipedians, repeatedly. We're trying to fixthe history of articles. don't move them please. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 03:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I understand now. Darn vandals... Ķĩřβȳ Ťįɱé Ø 03:46, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English

Do you have any idea what that Punjabi article might be about? I'll take to AfD soon otherwise (it's been two weeks.)

By the way, I'd really like it if you could check back at the page at least every week or so. We're sorely in need of people who understand arabic/farsi; we get articles in those languages from time to time and usually no-one knows what to do with them. Grand master ka 04:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's a couple new entries you should have a look at if you're still available. Regards, Grand master ka 06:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strawberry

You can use it in your signature if you want, but it looks as though you've already found a better picture. RENTA^{FOR LET?} röck 23:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KirbySig.JPG

Hi, sorry if this has already been dealth with, but please stop using this image in your sig, fair use images are not allowed on talk pages per Wikipedia's fair use policy, and if not used in an article will be deleted. Images in signatures in general are also discouraged (see Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages#Images and Appearance) though not outright banned (yet), however if you insist on using an image in your sig at least pick a free licensed one. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 10:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use Images and user pages

Greetings, I'm writing you to inform you that I've commented out the section on your user page that showed this image as under Wikipedia:Fair use rules such utilization isn't permitted. Netscott 10:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the Disfigurement of Iranian History

Are these okay edits on the part of this user?

[1]

[2]

The Azari-related articles are all massivly being deviated. Everyone should get proactive. The behaviour is anti-Iranian and anti-Azari (Azaris after all are an Iranian people) 72.57.230.179

Request for graph

Thank you for requesting a graph at Rational function. I moved your request to the talk page. Metainformation is more appropriate there, and less distracting than in the article. Thanks. You can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 17:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I think your joke with "new messages" at the top of your page is making fun of other people, and if I were you, I would remove it. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Muslims vs Criticism of Islam

Kirbytime, what you added was criticism of Muslims, not criticism of "Islam." Furthermore, all that paragraph was pure Original Research. --Aminz 08:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kirbytime. I am Amin. Nice to meet you. I was wondering why you re-added the last paragraph here: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Islam&diff=64626099&oldid=64626012

Regards, --Aminz 08:37, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kirbytime, I'm just confused; we may have had an edit conflict. Thanks anyway. --Aminz 08:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert? The source does not state 1.5 billion Muslims. Unless you can find a reliable source (preferably a book) that indicates 1.5 billion Muslims, please do not change it. BhaiSaab ^talk 20:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. BhaiSaab ^talk 21:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hammasa_np6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hammasa_np6.jpg. The image has been identifi