User talk:Krome~enwiki
Welcome!
Hello Krome~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 03:01, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Spam in Inner sanctum records
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Inner sanctum records, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Inner sanctum records is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Inner sanctum records, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Inner sanctum records itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Inner sanctum records
[edit]Hey there. Take it easy: I deleted the page not because it was an advertisement (another admin did that), but because it was empty—it lacked context and content, there was nothing in it except "put back this page please." If you can recreate it with some proper content and context, go right ahead. You may want to have a look at our notability guidelines before rewriting the article, so you can make sure it conforms and avoid having it deleted again. If it's deleted again and you think it shouldn't be, let me know and I will list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where there will be a proper debate. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and making personal attacks, as you did here is strictly forbidden. Do it again and you will be blocked. (As are legal threats.) Veinor (talk to me) 03:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- The best I can do is recreate the page as a subpage of your user page so you can work on it. However, if you want to put the page back in the encyclopedia mainspace, you'll have to change its tone significantly, and even that's no guarantee that someone won't object to it and put it up for deletion. Also, as Veinor said above, calling other editors such colorful names isn't gonna do much for your rep either. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- The page is now available at User:Krome/Inner sanctum records. You may now work on it, but please think very carefully before deciding to move it back into the encyclopedia proper. Best of luck, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome; see WP:MOVE. But please, read Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), Wikipedia:Attribution and Wikipedia:No original research first. By the way, if you do decide to recreate it, it's probably a good idea to observe proper capitalization too... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- The page is now available at User:Krome/Inner sanctum records. You may now work on it, but please think very carefully before deciding to move it back into the encyclopedia proper. Best of luck, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- The best I can do is recreate the page as a subpage of your user page so you can work on it. However, if you want to put the page back in the encyclopedia mainspace, you'll have to change its tone significantly, and even that's no guarantee that someone won't object to it and put it up for deletion. Also, as Veinor said above, calling other editors such colorful names isn't gonna do much for your rep either. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Krome. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Krome~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
01:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
15:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)