User talk:L Money Scribe

April 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Holyland (manga), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 03:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is literally two months ago. Real rapid fire opposition you have to worry about with this one. Clutch your purse with this whopper of evidence, honey. Oh, and good job defining "constructive" or any of the other things you stated earlier today (eye roll).

Once again, this has been the first time you've gotten push back.

And yes, I still want to know your boss's information. You should be ashamed of yourself. Go get someone else if you can't take it.

I will never understand what the damn problem is with doing what everyone else is doing. L Money Scribe (talk) 07:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kouji Mori (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kouji Mori and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can y'all maybe not have conversations that appear in my email inbox while I am not involved like I'm some kid in fucking timeout, please? The conversation ended last night, and this might also constitute harassment as well.

Trust me, working with you in this capacity is definitely off the table, I don't need to see this website anymore. And I know that if you're on my ass like this for summarizing a manga, of all things, I know you're gut-checking too many other people too. I think they'll be okay leaving too.

Just delete my profile if you're going to do that. And btw, you can go ahead and forget all about ANY donations from me from this day forward. That ship has sailed as well.

FYI: I've been visiting this website since 2005 and there were definitely articles, most especially plots, that were well passed 700 words like we're allowed via the guidelines you gave me. Not the 600 word limit that X-"ed from common sense" told to me. Switching it up like this is quite silly. And 11,000 words is not even three pages, so yes, I am okay writing what I write. If you're going to delete my shit, delete it down to the 700 word limit not everything you assholes.

Never did get that boss' name but, way to be ethical and all.

Allow me to conclude by saying that y'all can all go fuck yourselves. I'm done with you. Stop posting and don't do it again. L Money Scribe (talk) 03:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:PLOT

Please, be aware of MOS:PLOT (that suggests between 400 and 700 words) and try to be concise in the plot section of Holyland (manga), omitting excessive details. Xexerss (talk) 17:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Holyland (manga). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 20:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, usually I am pretty calm and collected, but, I saw this message and then saw what you did. So I'm giving myself permission to be angry now.

What the hell are you talking about when you say "unconstructive edits"? And how is it disruptive? I've posted summaries before and they are still up. There is no bad language here. They are also right out of the source material. I'm literally looking at it now.

I am absolutely upset at this. I'm trying to win people over to a manga, which I enjoy and am doing right by, fyi. And you literally just eliminated most of it because you had some vague problem with it. I put a lot of work into this. I am reposting every edit I have made AND will continue until it is permanent.

If you have a problem with that, I will be happy to discuss this over Skype, email, phone, etc.

But I will not tolerate you deleting everything I have posted for no reason whatsoever. I have already read your policies. I am not doing anything wrong. And yes, as soon as I figure out how, I AM bringing this to the administrators.

Now apologize and knock it off. Do not do that again. L Money Scribe (talk) 03:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have repeated to you many times the stuff about to not write long walls of text in the article, and all you have done is ignoring these warnings over and over again. I repeat once again, DON'T DO IT. Either write a simple premise summarizing the overall plot or simply leave the article as is. You should understand that this is not Fandom and the purpose of the site is not to "win people over to a manga". If you want to get more people interested in the series, there are other sites and communities where you can go to and recommend it instead of using the article as some kind of logbook. There is a reason why we have Template:Long plot; "The objective of a summary is to condense a large amount of information into a short, accessible format. It is not to reproduce the experience of reading or watching the story, nor to cover every detail. For those who have not read or seen the story, it should serve as a general overview of the major points. For those who have, it should be detailed enough to refresh their memory—no more." So yes, considering all the warnings and your refusal to heed them, you're definitely being disruptive. Stop narrating in detail each chapter, volume or whatever you're doing. If you do it one more time, I will have to report you at WP:ANI. Xexerss (talk) 06:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Holyland (manga), you may be blocked from editing. Xexerss (talk) 05:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have done no such thing. You have only stated to stop disruptive editing which is pretty damned broad. And I'm wondering how you can say that I am recreating the experience of reading this when this is prose typing and the manga is very clearly a picture/dialogue bubble graphic novel. Not to mention, when I go onto a movie page on this site, it VERY clearly states the plot and series of events, in order. Other comic books, books and historical events as well share this trait on this site. Why is that different? Why is it everyone else is able to do exactly what I am doing repeatedly, over and over, but yet, when I do it, it is disruptive? I find that strange. You going to delete that typing too? No? Well, I'll be damned.

You are going out of your way to police me for no reason whatsoever. I am not going to tolerate it, it is completely unprofessional and beneath a man who is clearly in an administrative/editorial role. You need to spend your time way more constructively. Because I think you have a personal problem and it ain't got a thing to do with me.

And this DOES "refresh their memory". It is also a general overview. There is a LARGE amount I am leaving out.

And this is the first time I've said anything to you period. Let alone to oppose you. Giving me rapid warnings in a row on the same day when they didn't even show up in my inbox until way later is not the same as patterns of ignoring you and being an asshole. Get mad at outlook.

Who is your boss? We need to square this. This is ridiculous. I want to know his contact information. I'm reporting you here and now. Enough is enough. I'd also like to know your information and a business phone number for wikipedia. L Money Scribe (talk) 06:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see the Dragon Ball (manga), Fullmetal Alchemist or Death Note articles, to name a few, using almost 600 words to "summarize" just their first volume? How else should I take the fact that after so many warnings you are only now getting around to addressing the issue? Xexerss (talk) 07:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Xexerss (talk) 06:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have yet to count individual words on any page, but I will say that when I look up Shakespearian plays, Haruki Murakami novels, tons of television show episode lists, there are damn sure more than 600 words on there. And I know very damn good and well that there are indeed pages on animes and manga that have probably been worded more than mine. Putting yourself into a smaller and smaller box doesn't help either.

Wasn't aware of a word limit or time limit to address this either. But hey, go ahead and limit everything you see to 600 or less words. Articles on the universe, mathematics, Leonardo DiCaprio, hey, we're all neighbors here. Go right ahead. Delete people's work. And speaking of time limits it's also quite showing who you are only now clarifying these complaints against me.

And you sent me many a damn warning all at once, there is yet to be ANY time before today that I have been anything less than passive. Now I'm not backing down and you're feeling the way you feel because you know you're full of it.

I would recommend to consider therapy. Is this how you talk to people at home? L Money Scribe (talk) 07:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 06:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I can see your conversations about me.

Move them to a different forum por favor.

I do not understand why you continue this the matter was settled and I walked. Don't know why you can't do the same L Money Scribe (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for egregious harassment and personal attacks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 07:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kouji Mori

Hello, L Money Scribe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kouji Mori, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kouji Mori

Hello, L Money Scribe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kouji Mori".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]