User talk:Legolas2186/Archive 20
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Legolas2186. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Awardsssssss
Lol, that's why I asked you to help. No, that's not me, the IP inserted 2 nominations without sources. Bluesatellite (talk) 10:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hmmm, good thing that you found it and reverted. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- OMG don't you guys read you can use IMDb as sources for those nominations? Check this link [1] and aslo [2]. Hope this will help. 219.90.216.41 (talk) 10:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but both sources can't be used as reference. Let me have a moment to search if I can find reliable source for those nominations. Bluesatellite (talk) 10:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the Saturn Award is a major award and Madonna's nomination should definitely be included in the list, other wise I think it will not be eligible for FLC. 219.90.216.41 (talk) 10:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not eligible for FLC? Really? You will come and oppose? — Legolas (talk2me) 10:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Don't use that tone with me Legolas. If I were not a Madonna fan I wouldn't waste my time watching your contributions and trying to find what can still be improved. Think about it, this is the list of Madonna's awards and nominations but such a nomination for a major award is not included, will it be a complete list? 219.90.216.41 (talk) 10:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Im not using a tone, u r mistaken to think so. Im just jinda baffled as to why you would think that just one award missing would not make teh article even eligible for FLC. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Don't use that tone with me Legolas. If I were not a Madonna fan I wouldn't waste my time watching your contributions and trying to find what can still be improved. Think about it, this is the list of Madonna's awards and nominations but such a nomination for a major award is not included, will it be a complete list? 219.90.216.41 (talk) 10:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not eligible for FLC? Really? You will come and oppose? — Legolas (talk2me) 10:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the Saturn Award is a major award and Madonna's nomination should definitely be included in the list, other wise I think it will not be eligible for FLC. 219.90.216.41 (talk) 10:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but both sources can't be used as reference. Let me have a moment to search if I can find reliable source for those nominations. Bluesatellite (talk) 10:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- OMG don't you guys read you can use IMDb as sources for those nominations? Check this link [1] and aslo [2]. Hope this will help. 219.90.216.41 (talk) 10:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
RE:
Sorry, I guess I was rushing through the reviews. I'll try to be more thorough next time. I also agree, numerous articles are being passed that shouldn't be, and they are being burned at FAC. I appreciate you noting me of this, and I'll be more through in future reviews. Candyo32 - Merry CHRISTmas :) 15:44, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I hope you will. You are a senior editor now, and should be aware of this while reviewing. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Bad Romance
Hello there! Sorry for the delay in responding to your query. I looked it over today and I think it's suitable for FAC at this time. There are a few prose glitches that I would point out, but nothing that couldn't be handled within the FAC. You will, of course, probably earn opposition over the fair use media, just considering the way things have been trending in that direction. Make sure your rationale for the video still is air-tight. You can always ask for a second opinion from another image reviewer if it becomes an issue. --Andy Walsh (talk) 16:36, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
GA review
I'm sorry Legolas. I usually check the dab links and ext links, but unfortunately forgot for those two. I'll surely check them from now. About the swap, I'm sorry again, I will wait for a review from now. I promise. Thank you for pointing out my errors :) Novice7 | Talk 06:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Don't say sorry, its not only you who has been doing these things. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'll wait for the reviews from now, and will do a thorough review :) Novice7 | Talk 06:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- And I hope you decline any other editor's request to review his article, for reviewing some of yours. Dude, this is ultimately not benefitting anyone and its your work which is becoming crap, as there's no healthy independent reviews at all. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I will. I actually like the normal review process, it is thorough and clear. Thank you again. I hope you're not mad at me.. Novice7 | Talk 06:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- No I am not. But I will be if I see such reviews again. I will drag that to GAR. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'll keep an eye out for them too. Btw, is Lord Ganesh connected with Wisdom of Life? I actually didn't know that :"> Novice7 | Talk 06:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, the fat man is really witty regarding life problems :) — Legolas (talk2me) 06:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Lol, you're funny. Also, I was wondering if this website can be used to expand background information for the song. I asked at RSN, but the reply was not clear to me. Novice7 | Talk 06:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, the fat man is really witty regarding life problems :) — Legolas (talk2me) 06:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'll keep an eye out for them too. Btw, is Lord Ganesh connected with Wisdom of Life? I actually didn't know that :"> Novice7 | Talk 06:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- No I am not. But I will be if I see such reviews again. I will drag that to GAR. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I will. I actually like the normal review process, it is thorough and clear. Thank you again. I hope you're not mad at me.. Novice7 | Talk 06:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- And I hope you decline any other editor's request to review his article, for reviewing some of yours. Dude, this is ultimately not benefitting anyone and its your work which is becoming crap, as there's no healthy independent reviews at all. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'll wait for the reviews from now, and will do a thorough review :) Novice7 | Talk 06:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Legolas, you told Lord Ganesh fat?!!!!! You are very naughty. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Seems reliable, that link. I did not see anywhere the subjects of the article being involved with the website. And yes Jivesh, I am naughty. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you Legolas :) Novice7 | Talk 07:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Lord Ganesh was also very naughty. See you later. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Can you please learn to indent your comments? — Legolas (talk2me) 07:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Lord Ganesh was also very naughty. See you later. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- No, I really want articles to be good. Do you think it can go through a reassessment? It's okay if it goes to reassessment.. I really want the prose to be good. Please, forgive me for my mistake. I won't be blocked or something for Wiki rule violation? Novice7 | Talk 10:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- You don't have to go through a reassessment and neither you will be blocked, since no one has brought this issue at ANI/GAN/GAR. Its too late now. I requested Candy to leave his comments. The thing that you have to do, in order to proceed for FAC, is innumerable Peer reviews and copy-edits. This is usually avoided if a good GA review is done. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- So, if I open up both the songs for a peer review, it's okay? Can you please point out the main errors, please? Thank you again. I swear I'll never do a swap again. You're really right, the correct way of GA review is the best.. You are a really good editor Legolas :) Novice7 | Talk 10:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, its okay, although its your own luck if your article will be Peer reviewed. See Novice, you have to be vocal about your choices, if you feel a review is wrong and inadequate, say it. Keeping mum wont help anybody, right? Now there are many MoS issues with the article. Try comparing it with an FA like "4 Minutes" and see what issues you find, especially with tracklist, credits, charts, references etc. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- You're right. Thank you.. I'll compare and fix the errors. I'll also start a peer review :) Novice7 | Talk 10:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- And Talk:Somebody to Love (Justin Bieber song)/GA1 is just beyond
. I never like blowing my own horn, but please take a look at reviews for Bionic and If I Were a Boy, this will probably teach you as to how to carry put a detailed review. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- And Talk:Somebody to Love (Justin Bieber song)/GA1 is just beyond
- I'm new to this, so I'll try my very best from next time onwards. It is too late to comment on Somebody to Love GA review, right? I'll notify him of the issues. Actually, I noticed some too. I am very bad in these things.. I wish I knew about these before :( Novice7 | Talk 10:32, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- You're right. Thank you.. I'll compare and fix the errors. I'll also start a peer review :) Novice7 | Talk 10:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, its okay, although its your own luck if your article will be Peer reviewed. See Novice, you have to be vocal about your choices, if you feel a review is wrong and inadequate, say it. Keeping mum wont help anybody, right? Now there are many MoS issues with the article. Try comparing it with an FA like "4 Minutes" and see what issues you find, especially with tracklist, credits, charts, references etc. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- So, if I open up both the songs for a peer review, it's okay? Can you please point out the main errors, please? Thank you again. I swear I'll never do a swap again. You're really right, the correct way of GA review is the best.. You are a really good editor Legolas :) Novice7 | Talk 10:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- You don't have to go through a reassessment and neither you will be blocked, since no one has brought this issue at ANI/GAN/GAR. Its too late now. I requested Candy to leave his comments. The thing that you have to do, in order to proceed for FAC, is innumerable Peer reviews and copy-edits. This is usually avoided if a good GA review is done. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay Legolas, I fixed some issues, copy-edited the article. Is it okay now? Anymore issues that you see? Novice7 | Talk 15:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- The comments are also for the other article that passed. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I guess WDIHSB is okay? I'll fix the other article too. A question.. I noticed that you commented not to use "2" in reflist (ie, {{reflist|2}}). Why is that so? Can I know, please? Novice7 | Talk 15:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- For number ofreferences < 20 it is not advisable. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. Another thing I'd like to know is if a single has more than one track, the credits for all the tracks should be included, even if the remaining tracks were also singles, right? Novice7 | Talk 06:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Should I Legolas? Novice7 | Talk 06:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I did not get you. Please clarify with examples and please raise a new section. I don't want my talkpage getting heavier and heavier like this. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Should I Legolas? Novice7 | Talk 06:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. Another thing I'd like to know is if a single has more than one track, the credits for all the tracks should be included, even if the remaining tracks were also singles, right? Novice7 | Talk 06:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- The comments are also for the other article that passed. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Ale-alejandro
I hope that my review is thorough enough. Maybe you should make more mistakes ;-). And BTW, lol. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ughhh really smart Adabow, those were the exact comments I was about to correct before teh GA review started. Guess that means that the review is good. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 13:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hehe, umm, thanks? Anyway, a few more things left. Adabow (talk · contribs) 22:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Best-sellers
Hiya legs :) Any idea where they are getting this info from?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 18:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- German website Mediatraffic. Not reliable. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- No, I know that, I saw the link, but I was wondering if maybe they got it from somewhere as well. Maybe something related to the IFPI?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 07:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Feedback
Alright... you don't mess with me, and I'll leave your friends alone Legalass. B. Fairbairn (talk) 03:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- You have exceeded the tolerance level for WP:NPA. You have to be blocked. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Don't threaten me. I made minor edits on one user's page after he told me to F___ off. Leave it alone; it does not concern you and it is over anyway. B. Fairbairn (talk) 10:55, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I don't need to. I have already notified admins of your behaviour, vandalism and personal attacks. You have crossed the civility level. Either apologize for your behaviour else leave editing. WP doesnot need editors like you. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay - if your friend apologizes for telling me to F___ off, I'll apologize for my behavior. B. Fairbairn (talk) 12:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- You started the profanity, you start the amendment, that's how I see it working. Be humble, and WP is a wonderful place to be. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:47, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay - if your friend apologizes for telling me to F___ off, I'll apologize for my behavior. B. Fairbairn (talk) 12:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I don't need to. I have already notified admins of your behaviour, vandalism and personal attacks. You have crossed the civility level. Either apologize for your behaviour else leave editing. WP doesnot need editors like you. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Don't threaten me. I made minor edits on one user's page after he told me to F___ off. Leave it alone; it does not concern you and it is over anyway. B. Fairbairn (talk) 10:55, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Question
Sorry about that. Okay, in How Will I Know single, there are tracks which were already released as singles. I was wondering if their credits (writers, production etc.) should be included too. Similarly in this, there is a live version and remixes of a previous single. Do we need to include their credits too? Novice7 | Talk 07:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- No for the first. For the second, yes for the live version, no for previous single's remix. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:06, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. What if the other track is a remix of the song itself? I will have to include the credits for it, right? Novice7 | Talk 07:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- If the remixed version was released separately like "Video Phone" then yes, else no. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you so much :) Novice7 | Talk 07:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- If the remixed version was released separately like "Video Phone" then yes, else no. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. What if the other track is a remix of the song itself? I will have to include the credits for it, right? Novice7 | Talk 07:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Legolas. You're so kind :) Is WDIHSB better now? Btw, the exact release date for How Will I Know is not known. I searched everywhere, but in vain :( Novice7 | Talk 13:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oops, forgot to sign before :"> If you're free, please take a look at both articles. Are they better now? Novice7 | Talk 13:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- They are, although if you develop "I Wanna Dance With Somebody" (Whitney's most iconic), make sure to have a legacy section ala "Like a Virgin". — Legolas (talk2me) 15:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I will, thanks for all your help. Can short articles become FA? I mean, is there a minimum article size for FAs? Novice7 | Talk 15:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- WP:WIAFA. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I will take a look. I opened up WDIHSB for a PR. Hopefully, I can make it much better. Thank you so much for all your help. Actually, beginners like me get inspiration from your works :) Novice7 | Talk 15:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I know, I'm legendary. Lol! — Legolas (talk2me) 15:35, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, you're :D Novice7 | Talk 15:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I know, I'm legendary. Lol! — Legolas (talk2me) 15:35, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I will take a look. I opened up WDIHSB for a PR. Hopefully, I can make it much better. Thank you so much for all your help. Actually, beginners like me get inspiration from your works :) Novice7 | Talk 15:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- WP:WIAFA. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I will, thanks for all your help. Can short articles become FA? I mean, is there a minimum article size for FAs? Novice7 | Talk 15:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- They are, although if you develop "I Wanna Dance With Somebody" (Whitney's most iconic), make sure to have a legacy section ala "Like a Virgin". — Legolas (talk2me) 15:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi there buddy :) So I noticed it has been sitting there for over a month, and it was IMO unfairly quick failed last time. I'll be reviewing it, just letting you know. Watchlist the review page :D--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 09:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I know. :( But just make sure you familiarize yourself with the nitty gritties of film articles. — Legolas (talk2me) 09:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
BRD
Just to let you know I reverted the change you made to Lady Gaga with an explanation on the talk page; please discuss. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 15:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Already commented :) — Legolas (talk2me) 15:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Single Ladies (3)
I will do it henceforth. Please tell me if i should upload this this. I saw many FA articles have this and my PR reviewer referred me to an FA article that also makes use of this sheet. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Probably the PR reviewer is not aware, but after a discussion at WP:RSN, sheet musics are not supposed to be uploaded as their image donot add to the general reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC. Also, sheet musics are supposed to be a tree link, as is done in "4 Minutes". — Legolas (talk2me) 09:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Please help me............ while inserting Decade End Charts, can i also put US Digital Songs, US Rhythmic songs? Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Dear friend, i am not begging for help, i am asking for help. I have been told already that i need to reduce the cultural impact, but no one is telling me how? What should i remove exactly? Please Legolas, reply me. Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Please help me............ while inserting Decade End Charts, can i also put US Digital Songs, US Rhythmic songs? Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Probably the PR reviewer is not aware, but after a discussion at WP:RSN, sheet musics are not supposed to be uploaded as their image donot add to the general reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC. Also, sheet musics are supposed to be a tree link, as is done in "4 Minutes". — Legolas (talk2me) 09:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, i did not mean to write that in bold. Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Reduce the description of each and every performance. You can make it one or two lines and that will be all. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:11, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- For number ofreferences < 20 it is not advisable. . Was this for me? Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- I have put two sub-headings here. Are they correct? Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Looks miles better now. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I have put two sub-headings here. Are they correct? Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Legolas. Some days ago, i trimmed this Single_Ladies_(Put_a_Ring_on_It)#.22Kanyegate.22. One week before, it was like [[3]]. Did i do something right? Actually, i did this because my PR reviewer told me to do this as it has an own article for itself. But everyone does not agree. What should i do? Please tell me but think well. Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Please reply when you get time. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Are you here? Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- The PR was right. And I'm kinda busy. — Legolas (talk2me) 08:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Legolas, i sincerely thank you for you support and concern but i do not really understand what you are trying to tell me? Please be more explicit. Please reply soonest possible. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:57, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ending-start is reviewing "Single Ladies". He previously reviewed "Ego". I will be very happy if you also help in reviewing it because you are the best editor i know. I mean, you have the ability to see even the smallest mistakes. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Is it my job to point out every little mistake in each and every damn article? The people who are doing these slacking reviews should step up their game, and frankly, I don't wanna get involved. I'm enough busy as it is. As for "Single Ladies", you have asked so many editors to copy-edit the prose, that ultimately it has deteriorated again. Have you ever heard of teh line "Too many cooks spoil the broth." ? — Legolas (talk2me) 04:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry Legolas i never meant to say that it is your job to point out every little mistake. I cannot really understand. Do you mean that the recent c/e were useless? Should i revert them? Legolas, i know you are very busy but please reply me. Please. Jivesh • Talk2Me 04:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- There has been so many copy-edits now that its impossible to see which version is good or bad. And you need to stop asking 100000s of users to copy-edit it. Its too much! When I asked you that you can submit the article for GA, I believed that the minor issues will be amended. Now the prose is sloppy once more! If I would have reviewed it, I won't pass it simply on WP:GA?1a. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry Legolas i never meant to say that it is your job to point out every little mistake. I cannot really understand. Do you mean that the recent c/e were useless? Should i revert them? Legolas, i know you are very busy but please reply me. Please. Jivesh • Talk2Me 04:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Is it my job to point out every little mistake in each and every damn article? The people who are doing these slacking reviews should step up their game, and frankly, I don't wanna get involved. I'm enough busy as it is. As for "Single Ladies", you have asked so many editors to copy-edit the prose, that ultimately it has deteriorated again. Have you ever heard of teh line "Too many cooks spoil the broth." ? — Legolas (talk2me) 04:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ending-start is reviewing "Single Ladies". He previously reviewed "Ego". I will be very happy if you also help in reviewing it because you are the best editor i know. I mean, you have the ability to see even the smallest mistakes. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
But what is wrong with the prose? By the way, i have asked many users to do a c/e but no one has done it till now. I have left a message at Tbhotch page, what's happening there. I saw he posted on the review. Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Can i show you something? Well it is not my business but do you think this is worthy of GA? Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- The non-free content abundance itself I would have failed it, as it fails WP:GA?3a. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Ending Start has a question .... [4] Jivesh • Talk2Me 06:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Legolas, it seems that Billboard links are not working. Jivesh • Talk2Me 06:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Drop GA review
Hi Legolas! I was watching Single Ladies review page, and saw you explain how to drop a review. Can I do that too? I was thinking of reviewing an article, but I have already reviewed another article by the same nominator. So, I just have to write I don't want to review on the GA page? The article is Myles Kennedy. Novice7 | Talk 06:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- If you weren't associated with the pages that the nominator nominated in any way, then its fine you can continue review. The situation at SL was different. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I have not edited the articles by the nominator. I feel that I'm not ready for biographical articles yet. Can I drop it? Novice7 | Talk 07:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Then yes, you can. Ask any admin to delete the GA page for you. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you Legolas :) I was really inspired by your comments. The reason I failed is that the nominator fixed the issues and then just reverted all of them back. It's like all my work go to waste :( Novice7 | Talk 07:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Then yes, you can. Ask any admin to delete the GA page for you. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I have not edited the articles by the nominator. I feel that I'm not ready for biographical articles yet. Can I drop it? Novice7 | Talk 07:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hey Legolas! I was cleaning up article talk pages, and have bumped onto something. According to this, the article was a GA (pre 2008), but was delisted. I see no link for both the reviews. Do you know how can I access them? Novice7 | Talk 15:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, thank you. I didn't know that old reviews were carried out on Talk page itself. Sorry to bother you :) Novice7 | Talk 15:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Single Ladies >> Extremely urgent
Hi Legolas, certain links from Billboard are no longer working. What can be done? Will you be able to do something if if give you the dead link, author, issue date? Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you Legolas. By the way i am not that little but i am short for my age. I am 1m 72 cm. Jivesh • Talk2Me 09:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Im 1m 86cm, so I'm a giant and I will eat you if you dont run along now....... Slrppppppp! — Legolas (talk2me) 09:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- You are very funny. Seems you are in a good mood today. Can't you please be like this everyday?!!! Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, c'mon grumpy gramps. Lighten up! :P Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your height is.......... I have no words. I wish you could permanently lend me some centimeters. (around 7 cm will be okay, lol) Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- LEAVE ME ALONE!!!!! GRAMPA IS BACK!!!! I'LL EFFING KILL YA, KILL YA!!!!. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- SOS, run!!!!!!!! These lines are from a film. Very funny. Bye, see you later. Happy New Year 2011 and may this year brings you most of the things you desire in life. Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- LEAVE ME ALONE!!!!! GRAMPA IS BACK!!!! I'LL EFFING KILL YA, KILL YA!!!!. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your height is.......... I have no words. I wish you could permanently lend me some centimeters. (around 7 cm will be okay, lol) Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, c'mon grumpy gramps. Lighten up! :P Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- You are very funny. Seems you are in a good mood today. Can't you please be like this everyday?!!! Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Im 1m 86cm, so I'm a giant and I will eat you if you dont run along now....... Slrppppppp! — Legolas (talk2me) 09:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
The Fame Monster GA Review
Just finished part of the review if you want to have a look :)--Blackjacks101 (talk) 04:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, I had a look and watchlisted it, but you can finish the review, that way I get an overview of teh changes I need to do, and it makes the prose flow much much better. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Kk I know you have been disappointed by most reviews...is mine what you want is there other things I should touch on? --Blackjacks101 (talk) 04:10, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- This may sound a bit high-n-mighty, but the articles I work generally don't require that much of work. But I appreciate that you have noted the state of reviews for the recent articles and you do whatever you feel will be the best review for the article. I have faith in you. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Your review is basically done, just a few errors here and there and then you'll get another GA. =D --Blackjacks101 (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm really impressed that users are taking up reviews seriously, and making it thorough. The reviews and promotions of teh last few months since I had taken a sabbatical was just so pathetic. You did a good job man. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks =D....When you started to bring up the problems with the reviews I started laughing because it was obviously true, so I'm glad you like it. It helps me determine that that is the type of review I should keep doing =D...it also helps that your articles are well done.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 16:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- He he, "high-n-mighty" like above. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks =D....When you started to bring up the problems with the reviews I started laughing because it was obviously true, so I'm glad you like it. It helps me determine that that is the type of review I should keep doing =D...it also helps that your articles are well done.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 16:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm really impressed that users are taking up reviews seriously, and making it thorough. The reviews and promotions of teh last few months since I had taken a sabbatical was just so pathetic. You did a good job man. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Kk I know you have been disappointed by most reviews...is mine what you want is there other things I should touch on? --Blackjacks101 (talk) 04:10, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Cprice finished more of my edits...now you just got to fix some of the bigger problems =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 16:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I will, but please tomorrow. Its 10.27 pm here and damn cold. I'm going to bed with some soup. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- No rush just wanted to let you know ;), hope you feel better!--Blackjacks101 (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I will, but please tomorrow. Its 10.27 pm here and damn cold. I'm going to bed with some soup. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, Lego, I'm not sure I'm gonna be able to do four of them. I'm 100% sure I'd screw it up. --Cprice1000talk2me 17:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I know this is kind of off topic but Legolas, do you agree with me that The Cherrytree Sessions and Hitmixes should be nominated for Articles for Deletion? They realistically don't include that much information that you wouldn't get from the Discography especially Hitmixes. I'd gladly nominate them if you agree. =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Does my opinion count? Because personally I agree, or at least on the Hitmixes. Just two sentences and a track listing. --Cprice1000talk2me 20:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Of course your opinion counts! Lol I know whenever I look at the HitmixesI want to do /facepalm --Blackjacks101 (talk) 02:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- XD Ok, I think it should be nominated for speedy deletion if we agree on this. --Cprice1000talk2me 02:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- I totally agree, I just want to know what Legolas thinks of it because for some reason after the article was deleted it was brought back and I was wondering if he knew why it was worth it.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 02:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- 100% agree that Hitmixes should be deleted. It won't get speedied, but a PROD or AfD sounds good to me. Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:35, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- I totally agree, I just want to know what Legolas thinks of it because for some reason after the article was deleted it was brought back and I was wondering if he knew why it was worth it.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 02:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- XD Ok, I think it should be nominated for speedy deletion if we agree on this. --Cprice1000talk2me 02:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- I know this is kind of off topic but Legolas, do you agree with me that The Cherrytree Sessions and Hitmixes should be nominated for Articles for Deletion? They realistically don't include that much information that you wouldn't get from the Discography especially Hitmixes. I'd gladly nominate them if you agree. =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Well, this has been a productive day! I got The Fame semi-protected and The Fame Monster is almost done for GA status. Also, I just nominated Hitmixes for deletion per WP:NALBUM. I realized it really isn't notable. --Cprice1000talk2me 04:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Morning guys *YAWNNNNNNN*. Wow, wonderful work in getting Hitmixes nominated for deletion. And Blackjacks I will do the changes now since C"awesome"proce has finished with the smaller reviews. Thanks all of you again! — Legolas (talk2me) 04:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Tenth Anniversary of Wikipedia Meetup announced
I am very very sorry dear. I though you live in Kolkata. I send invitation all off them of regrets sections of 1st wikimeetup.- Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 17:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Legolas, don't know if you saw the message I left on my talkpage but I'm happy for you to start your GA review of "Fire in My Heart". My eyes have gone funny from spending so much time editing Guerrilla] but I've just about finished now thankfully, good job it's such a brilliant album! Hope things are well with you, Cavie78 (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Hitmixes deletion page
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitmixes (2nd nomination) Contribute your opinion --Cprice1000talk2me 04:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Problem
Hitmixes already had a deletion discussion, so should I create a page called Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitmixes2 or something like that? --Cprice1000talk2me 04:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Yip, use {{subst:afdx|2nd}} instead. Tbhotch™ © Happy New Year 04:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
OHHHHHHHHH XD Yeah, thanks. Also, I should use that template, too. I keep an eye on like 20 user talk pages...... including yours. >:) --Cprice1000talk2me 04:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Wait, where do I put that? I'm not a bright one, I know :D --Cprice1000talk2me 04:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- On the article, and good morning. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 04:29, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
OHHH lol God, sorry, I've gotten used to Twinkle. --Cprice1000talk2me 04:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me Legolas....there isn't anything too extreme :D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 04:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- By the way guys, Cherrytree Sessions passes notability and verifiability on a large scale now. Background+Critical recpetion+Chart placement, enough to keep it. Don't nominate it for deletion. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me Legolas....there isn't anything too extreme :D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 04:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Oh, and good morning to you, even though I'm confused since it's 8:43 PM here. --Cprice1000talk2me 04:42, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Which universe are you from alien? — Legolas (talk2me) 04:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
XD middle earth! I'm in Memphis, Tennessee --Cprice1000talk2me 04:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, so jealous! I have wanted to visit Memphis ever since I watched Tennessee. :( — Legolas (talk2me) 04:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
I nominated myself for adminship (second time, as the first time I realized I didn't stand a chance and withdrew) I doubt I stand a chance this time either though XD --Cprice1000talk2me 05:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Why are you even trying? Are you drunk/high/sloshed/horny?? — Legolas (talk2me) 05:20, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Did you try? IDK Maybe I'm all four and I don't know how lol --Cprice1000talk2me 05:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- No I never tried although so many wanted me to be an admin. I'm sure its the last two that made you nominate yourself. *wink wink* — Legolas (talk2me) 05:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
ROFL Lego, you should be an admin! If you don't nominate yourself, I'll nominate you! --Cprice1000talk2me 05:32, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Nah dont, I dnt want to. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- The Fame Monster is now GA! =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 14:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oh my my. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- The Fame Monster is now GA! =D--Blackjacks101 (talk) 14:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
[5] – You are quite involved in several album types. Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:49, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup!
Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 12:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
GA Medal
|
The Good Article Medal of Merit | |
| For your contributions towards making The Fame Monster of GA status Cprice1000talk2me 16:32, 31 December 2010 (UTC) |
You should've seen this one comin'! :D --Cprice1000talk2me 16:32, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ahem, my second time. Lol. Thanks Cprice. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
How do you get those Green GA medal-like things on the top of your page? Don't you think I deserve one for TFM? Just sayin... :P --Cprice1000talk2me 18:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Admin nom (for me :D)
OK, so I probably don't deserve to be one, yet, but I've nominated myself for adminship. See here. Comment or ask a question if you like. --Cprice1000talk2me 05:53, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- You know, I really can't. Because I am too involved with you as a friend, so any comment I make would be construed as a biased and would be ignored. My first question would have been why the hell did you nominate??? Are you trying to sacrifice your real life and convert yourself to Wikimonster?? Eveb Gaga wouldn't approve.
— Legolas (talk2me) 06:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Didn't think about that...... hmmm. And I'm not that active..... well...... OK LMAO! Yeah I am a bit too obsessed, but I balance with my real life. I'm mostly only on at night. --Cprice1000talk2me 06:33, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I got up with my hangover and everythiong from 31st party just to see what this bitch has posted, and saw that she is releasing the album in May 2011!!!! I'm so PISSED!!! — Legolas (talk2me) 06:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- You mean GaGa? --Cprice1000talk2me 06:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Duhhhhh. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- OH! Yeah that is SO RETARDED!!!!! Maybe she backed out cuz Britney is releasing her album in March!!! >:) But, yeah and the worst thing is that SHE ALREADY FINISHED IT FLIPPIN MONTHS AGO!!!!! WHOLY CRAP! And also, about the "you've already failed" comment, yeah, I know but hey, nobody seemed to care or go and comment so I asked some people if they would. You know, if there are no comments it's sorta like an auto fail. So XD, you're probably right. But, hey, there's always the third time (The first time I backed out, so there is no page on it) --Cprice1000talk2me 16:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Duhhhhh. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- You mean GaGa? --Cprice1000talk2me 06:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I got up with my hangover and everythiong from 31st party just to see what this bitch has posted, and saw that she is releasing the album in May 2011!!!! I'm so PISSED!!! — Legolas (talk2me) 06:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Didn't think about that...... hmmm. And I'm not that active..... well...... OK LMAO! Yeah I am a bit too obsessed, but I balance with my real life. I'm mostly only on at night. --Cprice1000talk2me 06:33, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I finally got my talk page archived after constantly screwing it up. --Cprice1000talk2me 16:51, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Congratulations! Champagne?? — Legolas (talk2me) 14:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- ROFL Oh, and yes it will be something to remember and it will mark the second time I've backed out of a RfA discussion. Champagne does sound nice, but I might nominate myself again. --Cprice1000talk2me 15:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I was talking about the archiving succcess, I don't wanna go to that Rfa mess. He he. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I felt proud when I got it right. XD It was simple why it didn't work: I had Ending-Start's username in the username field because I copied it off his page. --Cprice1000talk2me 15:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- My my, this is exactly like Final exams getting messed up. :P — Legolas (talk2me) 15:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I felt proud when I got it right. XD It was simple why it didn't work: I had Ending-Start's username in the username field because I copied it off his page. --Cprice1000talk2me 15:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I was talking about the archiving succcess, I don't wanna go to that Rfa mess. He he. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- ROFL Oh, and yes it will be something to remember and it will mark the second time I've backed out of a RfA discussion. Champagne does sound nice, but I might nominate myself again. --Cprice1000talk2me 15:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Chelo
I saw that she is apparently being accused of sockpuppetting? --Cprice1000talk2me 16:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- And she is a 'truly atrocious user?" While I agree with the latter, I have no knowledge of her sockpuppeting. --Cprice1000talk2me 16:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- FYI, Chelo is a he. Tbhotch™ © Happy New Year 20:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ohhh I always mistake shes for hes and hes for shes. --Cprice1000talk2me 23:31, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- FYI, Chelo is a he. Tbhotch™ © Happy New Year 20:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
puhp uhpuhhphuh
So I'm working on the KYD fixes, but in the meantime, would you mind dropping some comments here? :)) Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 16:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wish you a safe and prosperous new year. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 20:21, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Re:GAR
I can ask for reassessment? Then I'll. Radio is not that big, but Diva is.. Novice7 | Talk 06:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- If, as a reviewer you are embarrassed about a review, that speaks volumes that the article probably mis-represented for GA. Then it is your onus to take up for community reassessment at WP:GAR, because as a reviewer you are failing to provide concrete commentary for the article's development. Good luck with it kiddo and a good 2011. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I must. The prose seems too sloppy sometimes (though I'm not good in English myself). Thank you :) I hope 2011 be good for you too. It's my last year in school (doing twelfth right now), so I have to concentrate on studies from now. I guess I won't be able to do major edits for a while :( Novice7 | Talk 06:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I opened a GAR. Can I write my own comments or should I wait for others? Novice7 | Talk 06:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- You write your comments, then wait for others to come to a consensus whether it can be kept or delisted. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- So, just like a GA review.. Novice7 | Talk 06:47, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- No, Ga reviews are completely up to the reviewer. Failing which is teh GAR. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Guess I mistook :"> I've pointed out some issues at the GAR. Novice7 | Talk 06:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- No, Ga reviews are completely up to the reviewer. Failing which is teh GAR. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- So, just like a GA review.. Novice7 | Talk 06:47, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- You write your comments, then wait for others to come to a consensus whether it can be kept or delisted. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
RE:Apolo
Well I'm glad for that clarification because I thought you may go on to blame me for world hunger and global warming. LOL :) Anyway, being more experienced than the upcoming editors, I should have been better, which also may have included being stricter on the Mimi articles. I'll know next time to refrain from swaps, and let everything take its course. It seems nowadays most editors are just infatuated with the GA icon rather than the quality content that its being displayed (even when this was outside of peak WikiCup season or other incentives), but the trend needs to be changed. Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 07:18, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well not everyone, me in particular, lol. Anyway, well throughout all of this, I really hope the quality of my articles have not declined. And I guess for the other editors instead of trying to step lightly around it, I'll take your stern approach. It sure worked on me. haha. Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 07:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Rep
Hehe, I wanna see all her main lists to be structurized. You've promoted four lists to be FLs, maybe I can help to developed the rest of them :) Bluesatellite (talk) 08:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Taylor Swift Wikiproject proposal
I have proposed that a Wikiproject for Taylor Swift be made. Please share your thoughts here. Thanks! ℥nding·start 22:54, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GagaBadRomancevideo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GagaBadRomancevideo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Oh dear... NPOV?
Legolas... I think we have a serious issue with the standards of some of these GA reviews. I was looking at Broken-Hearted Girl... I genuinely don't think it passes GA. It has incorrectly formatted references, and the prose is slopily written. What's more of concern is that Adabow nominated the article and EndingStart review it here with very little detail. Both users are part of project Beyoncé. So now not only do we have a quality issue but a potential conflict of interest? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 23:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- I have a similar issue with Ego (Beyoncé Knowles song). The lead doesn't conform to WP:LEAD. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 23:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Trolling around here, but agreed. I thought I noted that in a non-reviewer comment in the Ego review. Although I may have done a few myself, GAs and their reviews are being put together very sloppily and haphazardly these days. Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 23:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- I see what you mean, it does have some problems. --Cprice1000talk2me 23:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Trolling around here, but agreed. I thought I noted that in a non-reviewer comment in the Ego review. Although I may have done a few myself, GAs and their reviews are being put together very sloppily and haphazardly these days. Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 23:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
I must say, when I did that review, I never knew that me being a part of the Beyoncé project had anything to do with it. When I signed on to do the review of Single Ladies, I was told so, and that was a little bit after both reviews. I understand what you guys are saying about it's lack of reviewing; but I just honestly saw that the article(s) were good enough to be a GA. When Legolas reviewed Bionic, he mentioned the formatting refs thing, I fixed some of them, but have yet to understand what the problems really were. If you guys want to nominate it for a reassessment, you should go ahead. I'm sorry if I caused any troubles. I'll be sure to be more thorough next time. Is there an article where I can read about the proper formatting of refs? ℥nding·start 23:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Unique and Candy, as you guys must have noted while trolling (lol, gotcha) through my edits that I have raised the concern of the seriously falling standard of the music GA, and I kinda retributed Candy for it, too. Yes, I found extreme issues in "Ego", and dont even wanna comment on "BHG". Ending-Start, as requested, please refrain from reviewing articles where you had been a part of it, or articles part of any singular wikiproject that you have joined. Its a high case of COI, and well the reviews kinda suck major ass. Unique, "Broken Hearted Girl" should be taken to GAR. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- That's what I intend to do. Just out of interest I've posted this Notice about recent GAs. *sighs*. hope you are well Legoboy? good start to 2011? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 06:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm good and physically better now. Yes, 2011 looks promising for a promotion at work. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 06:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Good luck with that. Fingers crossed 2011 will bring love and an industrial placement that I need for my university degree! ... Oh I forgot I asked you to comment on peer review for When Love Takes Over before? A couple of people have commented since and I think its almost ready for FA but I didnt want to jump right in some I'm holding fire till yourself and some other experienced ones get chance to comment. P.s. i've added some of my thoughts about specific articles to the Beyoncé project wall. I will finish the list tomorrow. Feel free to add... GARs coming soon LOL -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 06:15, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm good and physically better now. Yes, 2011 looks promising for a promotion at work. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 06:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- That's what I intend to do. Just out of interest I've posted this Notice about recent GAs. *sighs*. hope you are well Legoboy? good start to 2011? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 06:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Fairplay and I totally get your drift. I might leave it a week and then go ahead and try to nominate it. In the meantime I'll focus on the B-stuff then if I'm feeling brave I'll delve into the Mimi project. Chisel and hammer at the ready lol. Yes I figured in general that the GA standard is going down. I wonder if its got anything to do with the Wikicup? Or if its just haste and excitement. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 06:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- No I agree with you completely. I hope this resolves the problem. Based on what I've seen I disagree with six of the ten reviews and overall I think two-three could be demoted if nothing was done about them. Its a sad day really when less than half of the GAs meet the required standard. I hope this is not a wide-spread issue. In my eyes GA is only a stones throw from FA so an article should be damn good before it reaches GA. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 06:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
I have nominated Broken-Hearted Girl for a GAR. Looking at what Unique said on the Beyonce Wikiproject, I see that it does not live up the other articles. ℥nding·start 07:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, don't worry, I am. xD The one's I had seen before didn't really go into that much, so I just kinda did that. I've done some of "Hello Good Morning" and was basing it a bit of your review you did of Bionic. ℥nding·start 07:18, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
I've opened the GAR page for it here. And for Woohoo, I will go over it again once the current issues I posted are fixed up. Trying my best to get these fixed up. ℥nding·start 07:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Is the new layout/sectionalising for Hello Good Morning ok? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 08:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Nice... btw,. why is teh section on remix far below? I have alwasy believed remixes to be an extension of the main composition, and part of the releases. Also, en-dashing needs to be corrected throughput the article and correct the credits section to "artist – title" format. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Better? :D p.s. I think Endingstart has got the idea... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Smokin hot!! And glad to see Ending-Start got the heck of good review. Hope that Novice7 and the others follow suit. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you sir! Can I ask a favour? Would you mind stalking my talkpage for a few days. Im gonna take a short break. I think I'm suffering from exhaustion and burnout in real life. thanks. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes I will monitor, and Exhaustion? Have you been doing the jumping and pumping at night a little too often?
— Legolas (talk2me) 03:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes I will monitor, and Exhaustion? Have you been doing the jumping and pumping at night a little too often?
- Thank you sir! Can I ask a favour? Would you mind stalking my talkpage for a few days. Im gonna take a short break. I think I'm suffering from exhaustion and burnout in real life. thanks. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- Smokin hot!! And glad to see Ending-Start got the heck of good review. Hope that Novice7 and the others follow suit. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Better? :D p.s. I think Endingstart has got the idea... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Nice... btw,. why is teh section on remix far below? I have alwasy believed remixes to be an extension of the main composition, and part of the releases. Also, en-dashing needs to be corrected throughput the article and correct the credits section to "artist – title" format. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Online Ambassador interest
You asked about a page detailing the expectations for being an Online Ambassador. The baseline expectations for being a mentor are laid out here: Wikipedia:Online_Ambassadors/Guidelines#Mentorship_process. There's definitely the opportunity to do more and other things, but that's the core role. Hope to hear from you soon! Cheers--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi
Yep don't worry. I've been away this week and extremely busy in the real world, but I should have it completed by tomorrow. Good night :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 08:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
There you go I now I have my own page Happy? List of Special Honors received by Lady Gaga Cause I'm Happy!!!=) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.244.230 (talk) 05:29, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Diva NFCC check
Legolas, is the screenshot for the glasses needed in the aforementioned article? I'm not sure about NFCC, so I could use your help. Also, has the article improved? Novice7 | Talk 09:21, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- There are redundancies in the article that can be eliminated. And no, the screenshot doesnot pass NFCC. — Legolas (talk2me) 09:24, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll inform Jivesh. Novice7 | Talk 09:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)