User talk:Lemonaka/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lemonaka. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Regarding Blood Stained Glory
Forgive me for asking, are there any guidelines finding that song quotes should be put only on wikiquote/wikisource? I couldn't find the source stating this and it seems that the primary issue is copyright. For example, pages linked below all have lyrics in them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Star_(1910_song) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_is_Good https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Cross_Buns_(song) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Internationale 130.132.173.99 (talk) 07:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- WP:NOTLYRICS&WP:NOTQUOTE -Lemonaka 07:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- It seems that the source you provided cuts a specific exception for shorter lyrics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Do_not_include_the_full_text_of_lengthy_primary_sources). Blood Stained Glory is significantly shorter than pieces likethe US national anthem not only in character count, but also in word count (if each Chinese character is counted as equivalent to an english word).
- "If out of copyright, shorter texts – such as short speeches (the Gettysburg Address), short poems ("Ozymandias"), and short songs (most national anthems) – are usually included in their article. Longer texts are best summarised with the full text placed on Wikisource, or given as an external link." 130.132.173.99 (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Article assessments
Please could you review and fix your recent assessments, as they have introduced contradictory ratings. An article cannot be Stub-class and Disambig-class [1]. Thank you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- sure, please wait for a while, currently working in the hospital... -Lemonaka 01:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Restoring biographical content
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
Hello Lemonaka,
When restoring content to a biography of a living person, such as the article about Lacey Hull, you are responsible for your own actions and need to ensure that you are not blindly restoring badly sourced, contentious material.
Regarding "I need to revert" (Special:Diff/1206155996): As stated both in WP:BE and WP:BRV, even in response to sockpuppetry, When reverting edits, care should be taken not to reinstate material that may be in violation of such core policies as neutrality, verifiability, and biographies of living persons.
Also, creating an account while there is no block on the IP address, even if the account is used only for continuing an edit war previously done without an account, is not sockpuppetry unless more accounts are created or logged-out editing follows. Creating an account during a dispute and then sticking to that account is fine.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
All I did was change “based” to “inspired”
All I did was change “based on” to “inspired by”. It’s a simple rewording. There is no source to cite. 2603:900A:1102:FE4E:858A:9DC0:C164:54FD (talk) 08:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @2603:900A:1102:FE4E:858A:9DC0:C164:54FD What? You add "despite being an 80 year old book," to the caption, is there anything for sourcing that? -Lemonaka 10:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
False accusation
Please use my Talk page next time to save both of us time. --94.255.152.53 (talk) 09:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
It seems you added the same link twice. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi Lemonaka :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
ANI
I have closed the new section your started at ANI that was repetitious and disruptive. I am AGFing that this was just an outlier-action born out of frustration. Nevertheless such actions end up both needlessly escalating drama and wasting valuable community time. Please move on. Abecedare (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Lemonaka! I hope all is well. I am here to ask about your questionable comment for declining. For the reason of declining, it was put "This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission." Which is fair enough. Yet, for the AFC comment, you didn't provide what specifically was wrong, only one remark about a certain portion, saying " "Yet the Mononobe sent for him to go "Fishing", this was an attempt at making him Emperor. This failed." what the hell is that???". That is absolutely nothing to go off, and gives me no clues as to what specifically is the problem, and what specifically you think should be changed. I changed that bit of the article you asked for, but what else needs to be done? Please do not review the article if you will not provide sufficient reasoning or context clues. I mean this in absolutely no negative way, this is merely constructive criticism and I would like that for the article.
All the best- Camillz. Camillz (talk) 13:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but what's the meaning of go "fishing", attempt to make who to become emporer? what failed? You need more context for explain such content, and on the time when I reviewed your draft, there is no reference for that -Lemonaka 15:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fishing. As in he was taken to "Go fishing" but in actuality they wanted to take him to crown him Emperor, which I have edited. Please attempt to be more professional with this! Camillz (talk) 00:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Camillz Sure, I've reviewed the content after your change, this read better. -Lemonaka 13:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much!
- All the best - Camillz (talk) 12:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Camillz Sure, I've reviewed the content after your change, this read better. -Lemonaka 13:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fishing. As in he was taken to "Go fishing" but in actuality they wanted to take him to crown him Emperor, which I have edited. Please attempt to be more professional with this! Camillz (talk) 00:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I was trying to place a hatnote to indicate a place to look for reduplications that would have similar/same pronunciations. Otherwise, there'd be a larger hatnote. There are other topics to find later such as Baum Baum and Bomb Bomb; as "Bom Bom" was listed at "Boom Boom", and "Baum" and "Bomb" are listed at BOM; those would seem to be the likely locations to list other confusable similar pronounciated terms. -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 03:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @64.229.88.34 That's a wrongly clicked revert, I've restored it. -Lemonaka 03:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the response -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 03:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)