Jump to content

User talk:Letcreate123/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

ToonLucas22, you are invited to the Teahouse!

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Teahouse logo

Hi ToonLucas22! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Handy tip about talk pages

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Read WP:OWNTALK. Users are allowed to delete comments off their own user page if they want. Because it's their own personal page the rules are different to the rest of wikipedia.Bosstopher (talk) 22:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Bosstopher. Just wanted to warn this user about it too. It is not worth edit warning on Users talk pages as it is against policy. It would be wise of you to disengage. Thanks Avono (talk) 22:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, ToonLucas22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Avono (talk) 22:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Stubs

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Please take care not to waste other editors' time by adding {{stub}} to an article which already has an appropriate specific stub tag. And please also note that stub tags go at the end of the article, not the top - see WP:ORDER. Thanks. 10:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Twinkle

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi there! Thanks for your recent vandalism reverts! I thought I'd let you know that there's a handy tool that allows quick access to many functions, Twinkle. As you're autoconfirmed, you can use this tool, if you so wish. You can enable it in your preferences. Once you've enabled it, you should see a TW tab next to the "More" menu. Additionally, you can configure this tool on this page. Happy editing! George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 17:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Please explain your revert of my edit

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Please explain your revert of my edit at Template:X-Men because you did not offer up any explanation besides "Was correct", which means almost nothing after my lengthy explanation in the previous edit summary, which I am fully correct about. I do not want to violate the 3RR or start an edit war, but I proved that she was a member and you deleted it almost immediately after I explained it, why? 71.121.241.118 (talk) 02:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

You didn't provide a link, which caused the edition to be incorrect. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 02:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
You can't put links in edit summaries, so how could I have done it? Like I said, it was referenced years ago in the edit summaries because references aren't used in templates, edit summaries are the only place to do it, which I did. It's not my fault the other user didn't go back and look far enough. It's proven on the talk page now, so she can be added back. 71.121.241.118 (talk) 02:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Arab Brazilian

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi, can we get rid of the statistics? Because it looks like it has been empty for 5 years.173.206.5.42 (talk) 02:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Don't restore removed comments

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi, ToonLucas. I understand that your intentions were good, but you're mistaken about removing warnings.[1] Users are allowed to remove anything from their talkpage except denied unblock requests and a few other oddities. You should not restore posts that they remove. Note especially that edit warring to restore them is a really poor idea, and can get you blocked. See WP:BLANKING. Bishonen | talk 10:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC).

Do not edit others votes please

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Which part was the self promotion? I noticed that you reverted yourself later, but either way, you are not supposed to edit others comments or edits on talk pages. Hafspajen (talk) 10:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

That was a mistake. Sorry. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 12:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

I did not do it.

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} You gave me a warning. Here is my response:

That is strange. Honestly, I did not do it intentionally. When I tried to make a post, somehow I encountered an error, and then the Wikipedia Foundation(?) showed up. I went back and refreshed, but the templates were all gone! I swear I did not do it intentionally! I really don't know what happened! Can you excuse me for this incidence? 71.79.234.132 (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, sorry for failing to assume good faith, when huge content gets deleted (specially on talk pages), I tend to take them very seriously and give the user who deleted the things a 4im warning level. But don't worry, the deleted content was restored. My apologies. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 01:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your message

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Wait, what did you mean I edited/vandalized other messages? I didn't touch anyone else's stuff. I got an edit conflict, and I pasted my message back in at the bottom. Oh, and that *was* the reference desk I was asking on, thank you very much, so asking me to move my question there is a bit redundant. --Borat is very nice (talk) 01:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

@Borat is very nice: You replaced "cloud" with "butts" on other's messages, which was considered unconstructive and was therefore undone. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 01:20, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Oh my god...I am so sorry, I know why that happened. I'm using the Firefox extension "cloud to butt" https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cloud-to-butt-plus/. I didn't know that it would mess up wikicode too. Can I uninstall that extension and ask the question again? I also fixed your response, which the extension messed up too.--Borat is very nice (talk) 02:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
@Borat is very nice: You may wish to disable or uninstall that extension because it's messing up talk pages and main pages (and can possibly mess up the page Cloud too). You may also wish to report that extension to the Mozila Firefox developers to block it and prevent further irrelevant information on your talk page. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 02:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Already done, thanks. --Borat is very nice (talk) 02:33, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Jan

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} I am not saying you are not allowed to do it. All I am saying is that it is a cowardish move to do that while we are in conversation, as you cannot back up your points. Vaselineeeeeeee (talk) 21:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

But I still have the right to delete sections from my User talk page, as told by WP:BLANKING. Please refrain from restoring this section any further. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
So you are pretty much agreeing that you are acting like coward and that you have no points to back up your argument and that it should remain. Vaselineeeeeeee (talk) 21:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Well, league information seems pretty much unnecessary to me, so it's best not to put that on football player pages. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 21:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
So what I am gathering is that only your opinion matters and not mine, so your opinion is greater than mine so you should be allowed to revert my additions but if I revert yours it is considered editwarring? Weird and unfair how that works isn't it? Vaselineeeeeeee (talk) 21:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
It's actually best to resolve the thing on the talk page rather than attempting to continuosly revert edits. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 21:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Could you please restore Andrea Pirlo and Alessio Cerci articles do what it was before the edit war without serie A. I could do it on my own but dont want to risk getting blocked for breaking 3RR or edit warring. QED237 (talk) 23:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Problem

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

You tagged the image as soon as it was uploaded. Didn't even give me the chance to add in all the details. As well, you tagged it for deletion when you are supposed to use the tag below. Don't make hasty decisions like that. Very amateurish. WWE Batman131 (talk) 21:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hello ToonLucas22 (talk · contribs). Regarding some of your edits at the edit warring noticeboard, it appears that you are making decisions reserved for the administrator team. An example of such an edit can be found here. While we encourage outside input and thoughts from non-administrators, decisions regarding whether or not a violation took place and an appropriate response should be left to an administrator. The noticeboard is called "Edit warring" after all, meaning that we are not simply looking for violations of the three revert rule. Thanks for understanding, Tiptoety talk 23:42, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, I thought these templates were for when someone was blocked or already blocked, but not for exclusive administrator use. Sorry. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 00:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

onepoint edits

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi, saw you edits, I'm cleaning up some spammy web links will annotate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onepoint (talk • contribs)

Ok, thanks, and please be sure to include an edit summary when you make edits (if possible). Also, please sign your comments with ~~~~. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 02:04, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Main Page

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive363#I_deleted_the_Main_Page for shits and giggles :) Avono (talk) 12:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

.

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} i made a non vandalistic change to html :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niki201 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Unreliable contribution

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hitenray09 had submitted entire plot without any reliable reference . Instead of targeting me you should ask him where is his source. What i did was necessary as the user was submitting unsorced material--Frost The World (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, but you could have put an edit summary anyways, something like "remove unsourced". --ToonLucas22 (talk) 16:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
It would not have been true to say "remove unsourced", because what Frost The World removed was not just the text but also the reference. As it happens, the text was a verbatim copy from the reference, and therefore a blatant copyright violation which would have been the correct grounds for removing it. I have warned Hitenray09. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Copyright problem icon Your addition to Baby (2015 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

What? I didn't add the content, I just reverted his edit due to unexplained removal of content, but I didn't know it was a copyvio. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Ziyad Abd El Noor

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi, thank you for note< i revertetd all of the edits that you undid and left reasons too. I can leave more reason, again, is all Iam wriing is accurate. Also Is question of notability not settled. Notoriuos and notable are not the same. Masalama. minZahle — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinZahle (talk • contribs) 19:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Impossible Game (January 25)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CraigyDavi was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. —CraigyDavi (T∙C∙@) 14:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

revert changes

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi, please reinstate my changes to the page Videoville Showtime. My edits were not made in error and I've cited sources on my talk page. Thanks! FilmFan81 — Preceding undated comment added 19:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. AlexGheorghiu (talk) 18:39, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. AlexGheorghiu (talk) 18:39, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Impossible Game (February 3)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josve05a was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:34, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

.

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Why have you deleted the user homepage "Themillionselfiesite"? It is just a description of the website as it is a new social media and not an advertising!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themillionselfiesite (talk • contribs) 14:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

I have not deleted it, I just tagged it for speedy deletion, and I did it because it appeared to be unambiguous advertising or promotion and therefore meeted speedy deletion criteria WP:G11. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


ANI Notice

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Information icon Hi ToonLucas22. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Pandi (god), a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! Jim Carter 10:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Reply to comment on User talk:223.227.98.130

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hello, ToonLucas22
I do not understand why you removed my comment on User talk:Malik Shabazz. That administrator is a stupid little git who does not know anything apart from reverting others' edits, issuing warnings to innocent users, biting newbies, (just look at his contributions) and vandalising. Thanks, 223.227.98.130 (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

I removed your comment because it was uncivil. By the way he did not vandalize, he did just remove some nowiki tags which messed up the page. See WP:CIVIL and WP:UNCIVIL if you want to learn more about civil comments. BTW what you said about the administrator in your message to me is considered harassent. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
One, you reply to my message. Two, you take the trouble to see exactly what vandalism I was talking about. Three, you issue me not one, but two user warnings. Four, you even post a {{talkback}} template. Budding administrator, I see. Why don't you take some time off from this tomfoolery to go and improve some articles? People like you, as well as almost all of those administrators, are not here to contribute to the encyclopedia. 223.227.98.130 (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
ETA: Ah, I see why you (and others like you) cannot really improve articles, because you do not even know the spelling of 'harassment'. Regards, 223.227.98.130 (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
@223.227.98.130: I am not an administrator, I am just a normal user, and I'm here to fight vandalism, which counts as being here to build an encyclopedia. Please also take the time to see what "not being here to build an encyclopedia" is not. It also appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia, as you keep making uncivil comments. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
When I said that you are a 'budding administrator', I meant that you are aspiring to be an administrator. See, you misinterpret comments so easily, making yourself even more unfit for WP. By the way, you should yourself take a look at WP:NOTNOTHERE. I am here to build an encyclopedia because I am contributing to it in an indirect manner, by attempting to change your mentality, as well as that of others who may chance upon this page, by encouraging you to edit the articles rather than wasting your time. The page says that expressing unpopular opinions – even extremely unpopular opinions – in a non-disruptive manner counts as being here to build an encyclopedia. Thanks, 223.227.98.130 (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm not aspiring to be an administrator either. BTW you are expressing unpopular opinions in a disruptive manner. From your contributions, at least 85% are pure uncivil comments, which appears to meet WP:NOTHERE. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
You are trying to to teach me civility, when you yourself don't have the civility to add "Thanks" or "Regards" at end of your posts. Best regards, 223.227.98.130 (talk) 17:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
People don't really need to put "Thanks" or "Regards" to their comments to be civil, do they? I mean, that applies to level 1 and some level 2 user warning templates, but not on every comment. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Could you tell in what way I disrupted Wikipedia? I did not even touch any article after that first edit. I have made nearly a thousand constructive edits to Wikipedia, through other IP addresses and a user account. Of course, I have not logged in because I cannot risk being blocked for expressing these unpopular opinions:) Regards, 223.227.98.130 (talk) 18:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
You made an uncivil comment on User talk:Malik Shabazz, which was considered disruptive. Also, making edits on other accounts/IPs or editing while logged out from your account is considered sock puppetry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToonLucas22 (talk • contribs)
Call me disruptive, or call me being not here to build an encyclopedia, but you cannot deny the fact that all those policies are written by people like you, people who share a similar mentality. Do you know that Malik Shabazz is an Islamic name, still the user claims to be a Jewish?
Again, you have now even forgotten to sign your post, showing exactly how great a editor you are. Anyway, it has been a pleasure talking to you, ToonLucas. If I had not initially made that comment on User talk:Malik Shabazz, then we would have never had this wonderful conversation. How do you think about this? You are a funny man, always replying to my comments and egging me on, even though I have meant nothing but fun. Bye. I am saying this now because the next time I check out this page, I may well have been blocked for making the decidedly uncivil comments. Good luck, 223.227.240.142 (talk) 04:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
I did not write any of these Wikipedia policies, and btw you could have used {{subst:Unsigned|ToonLucas22}}. I'm doing it myself, just so that you get it. So bye. BTW it looks like you changed your IP to avoid scrutiny. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Andreas Werle

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hello ToonLucas22. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Andreas Werle, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: user is entitled to blank his own user-page without having it deleted. This is an experienced user (admin on German Wikipedia) who would know how to ask for deletion if that is what he wanted. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Tags in draft space

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi! You removed a COI tag I placed (for good reason) on Draft:Tigran Maytesian‎, with the summary "Tags should not be added to drafts" – something I didn't know. Is that a policy or a guideline? I'd be interested to read about it - can you point me to it? (It would have been helpful to include a shortcut in your edit summary) Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

@Justlettersandnumbers: Well, since drafts are articles that have not been created yet, it's best not to tag them, just wait for someone to review it. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 01:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
That's your opinion, and you are entitled to it. But if you are going to undo another editor's work, you need a reason, not an opinion; it's also good practice to cite that reason in your edit summary. Is there any policy or guideline that you are aware of which forbids, discourages or even discusses maintenance tags in Draft space? I'm aware of course that such tags are not used in User space. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
If you can't cite the policy or guideline, perhaps you'd be good enough to restore the tag you removed? Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Did you see this, ToonLucas22? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Draft:Lapalux. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) wrong template. He was merely confusing draft space with user space not owning it Avono (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

108.25.73.174

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} He's causing trouble again. Maybe an extended ban is in order? An admin would be needed to end his childish antics. 70.45.65.243 (talk) 22:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

I have already reported him at WP:AIV. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 22:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. And I see he's been dealt with. 70.45.65.243 (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

References

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:20, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Reverting minor edit

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Hi, you said in the edit summary that my reversion of a non-minor minor edit was a "bad reason for a revert". The reason I did it is because I had warned that user previously about minor edits, and they still keep doing it (all 2 of their edits). I did explain in my revert summary that the user should re-add the edit, and I would have done it myself if they hadn't (perhaps I should have added that to my edit summary). I thought that was the best way to try and teach the user that they need to be careful about making minor edits. If you have any better suggestions for what to do in future, let me know. --sciencewatcher (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Revert of edit

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Check here. What's the IP wants to convey? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vin09 (talk • contribs)

Alexander Dmitrievich Bruno

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Please pay attention to what you're restoring before doing so, instead of just blindly reverting. This page was obviously repeatedly vandalized and contained serious BLP violations. When in doubt, report the article to WP:AIV or WP:BLP/N. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

How to make userpages and userboxes

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

How do I create userpages and userboxes and how do I use them. I hope you know and will be able to tell me. From Kuching, Abner then (talk) 09:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC).

Abner then, creating userboxes is a bit involved, but take a look at Wikipedia:Userboxes for more information. Alternately you can copy the code from an existing userbox and edit it to your specifications.
Using a userbox is pretty easy - once you find one you want (a list can be found here) simply add the code to your userpage - for example:
Userbox code Result
{{User:UBX/Rome}}
This user is interested in ancient Rome.
If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, the IRC channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 10:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the info!! Abner then (talk) 09:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Check

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} An IP User talk:49.206.234.30 is adding WP:OR on Adilabad page.--Vin09 (talk) 05:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Hi ToonLucas22! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:59, Monday, February 23, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sobrang Monastery

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Far too few AfD nominators have the integrity to withdraw their nom when appropriate. Respect ToonLucas22. -Arb. (talk) 21:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Information icon Hi ToonLucas22. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Shelton College, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. First, you should never apply a speedy 2 minutes after the article was created. Second, all that is required for an accredited college or high school is proof of its existence. No other notability need be shown. The fact that the author added referencing a few minutes later caused another editor to properly remove your speedy template. Please read WP:BEFORE. If you are going to mark an article for speedy deletion, you have the responsibility to see if there are references for its notability. Lastly, quick application of a speedy template is a bad practice as most authors of lower quality articles are new like yourself, which means that WP:BITE applies. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! John from Idegon (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Denver Stevenson

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Your recent edit (the one that added 33 thousand bytes) must have accidentally added duplicate contents. But it's gone now anyway. —George8211 / T 19:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


Febuary 2015

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} the edit i made to skylanders is correct becuase Activision announced it on their site i will provide it on the article but how do i provide that reliable source. Superflashieboy123 (talk) 01:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. In particular, to make references, use the <ref></ref> tags, and place the link inside the tag. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

found no source for my edit so i guess you are right Superflashieboy123 (talk) 01:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)


this editor has sweared at my talk page what should i do! Superflashieboy123 (talk) 01:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Per WP:NPA, what you should do when you receive personal attacks (like the one you received), it's best to remove it and issue a level 1 warning (or 4im in blatant and/or grotesque personal attack cases). I already did myself, and issued the attacker a 4im warning. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 01:52, 26 February 2015 (UTC)


this editor sweared again and removed my edits to terraria Superflashieboy123 (talk) 01:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Again, I removed his personal attack and reported him at WP:AIV. ClueBot NG already reverted his edit on Terraria, so don't worry. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 01:58, 26 February 2015 (UTC)


thank you so much for all the the help that editor should get blocked for harrasing me. Superflashieboy123 (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)


Is the editor blocked that would be awesome Superflashieboy123 (talk) 02:16, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, he was blocked for 31 hours, then permanently. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 02:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

What if the editor makes a sockpuppet I can tell he is going to come back Superflashieboy123 (talk) 02:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

If you suspect sockpuppetry, report the sockpuppeter/sockmaster at WP:SPI. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2015 (UTC)


Cooliemandude has created a sockpuppet called Bodybuildar see my talk page he wrote a message but check history as well he said he will revert my edit on terraria but fortunatly the page is protected. He called me a twit please report him becuase I cant the page is semi protected. Please report! Superflashieboy123 (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Already blocked by User:Floquenbeam as obvious and blatant sock of Cooliemandude. Its strange that the disabling of account creation didn't work. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 23:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)


I don't know why people are thinking i am a sockpuppet but you need to trust me i am not a sockpuppet i am not i am i am not no sockpuppet Thank you Superflashieboy123 (talk) 20:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


I herd you play minecraft that is very interesting becuase I play too! Superflashieboy123 (talk) 12:29, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


Anyways, I fear that User:Cooliemandude will create another sock puppet but if he does I will report him as a sock puppet. I feel like I know this guy from outside. At least he has not reverted my edits on Terraria. Thank you Superflashieboy123 (talk) 12:36, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Invalid deletion criteria

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} You tagged Schooled: The Price of College Sports for speedy deletion with the reason "misuse of Wikipedia as a diary". It should have been clear enough that this article was about a film, and that the long, rambling section was, in fact, a scene-by-scene description of the film's action. The fact that the article was poorly written is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Thanks for the cleanup on my talk page. Already reported the user to an admin. Best, ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 22:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Phobia CSDs

I WP:A11'ed all those articles (ok, technically redirects). I wasn't certain about the CSD categories for redirects since all those titles are not found in searches. I'll change them all to R3 if that is what they should be under.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Saint-saens-1875.jpg

Hi there. You thwarted my attempt to move File:Saint-saens-1875.jpg to Commons because of the "Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons" notice. But the notice continues "unless it can be verified to be in the public domain in its country of first publication". The picture was first published in France in 1875 and I believe that the drawing is in the public domain in France. According to Gallica the artist Paul Renouard died in 1924 and engraver Frédéric Florian, died in 1926. According to the table on the page Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#Specific_country_information the copyright in France is 70 pma. I therefore added the tag : "PD-old-auto-1923|1924". Copyright rules can become very complex but I thought this was a simple case. Have you any reason to believe my reasoning is incorrect? Many thanks. Aa77zz (talk) 15:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Please re=read WP:Deletion policy and WP:CSD

You cannot re-add a speedy tag, if it was removed by anyone other than the article creator. And in any case, anyone could ask that a G13 deleted article be restored,& it is restored automatically. If you want to challenge the continued existence of a Draft after a G13 tag is removed, you need to use MfD DGG ( talk ) 20:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

My first webpage

You told me something about making the webpage named "Transformers 5 (2016)" and here is my response:

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... I just saw that no one has made this page. I have waited a long time, and the page never was made. I am sorry if I did something wrong by deciding to make one on my own. You can delete it if you want. But I really wanted to have the page. I am new here, and do not know better than just making a new page. Sorry if it upset you. --MarKreationsStudios1 (talk)

Thanks!

Thank you for your help. I'm new around here... -- Mysterious Gopher (talk), 14:14, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Jacques Blamont

Hi Mate, thanks for the nice words on the article, Jacques Blamont.--jojo@nthony (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Sarah McEneaney, ToonLucas22.

Unfortunately Nicky mathew has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

nice work Kelsey, thank you for your contribution.

To reply, leave a comment on Nicky mathew's talk page. — Preceding undated comment added 18:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphan tags

Do you think you might wait more than a minute... maybe, at least, an hour... before tagging new articles with "orphan tags"? Not everyone works at light speed, you know... Famartin (talk) 18:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Oh, sorry for that. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 18:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

your speedy deletion tag on user pages

Please note that user pages cannot be deleted like other Wikipedia article. I strongly recommend you to read page curation in detail and why do want to delete my user page anyway ? Probably a mistake, I believe. Thank you and happy editing Nicky mathew (talk) 04:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to: Our House

I have reverted your contribution on Welcome to: Our House which User:Aft197 has reverted again I also gave him a warning on his talk page. Amitabhfan (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Question

I know about blocking but who can block editors? Amitabhfan (talk) 19:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@Amitabhfan: Administrators of any kind. ToonLucas22 is not one of them. — Nick the Red37 (talk · contribs) 14:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi ToonLucas22. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Swarm... —X— 18:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of BLPs

I quote WP:BLPPROD: "Unsourced biographies of living people (BLP) created after March 18, 2010, can be proposed for deletion using a special proposed deletion process. To place a BLPPROD tag, the process requires that the article contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc.), which support any statements made about the person in the biography." So this distinction between references and external links is not supported by the relevant guideline. PatGallacher (talk) 20:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Rae Sremmurd

Your abuse of rollback has been noted and reported [2]. In the future do not rollback edits blindly without examination. Dngmnglr (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki

Hello, ToonLucas22, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 09:39, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Youtab

Toonlucas I believe that youtab is a fake person because in history it said that youtab was a fictional person Amitabhfan (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

But your edits are still considered vandalism. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 15:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Regarding Haim Moussa Douek

Hi ToonLucas22. I notice you have been reverting User:Kareflib's edits for being unconstructive. Thing is, he wrote that article. At this moment I myself am quite unsure as to how to respond to that, but I doubt he is being disruptive as the article was created by him and he might just be playing around with it.

As the subject appears to be notable enough to me, the article should stay, but should be tagged for cleanup. Optakeover(Talk) 15:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot to see who is the page creator. Still, these edits may be considered tests. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 15:52, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

My report on WP:AIV

I'm going to assume good faith and withdraw my report. If you object to my removal of your comments, please let me know. Regards, Optakeover(Talk) 16:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Jorge Pereyra Díaz

I changed it according to his [page] he never played for Real Madrid.202.142.117.67 (talk) 18:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

How come did he play in the top division pls give proper source202.142.117.67 (talk) 19:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thank you for giving us advice not to "feed the trolls", especially on https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Morty_Smith_2.0&action=history. The Snowager-is awake 19:59, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

kuruvadi

Dear

Kuruvadi is our village in Tamil Nadu. India. Somebody redirected to some fights name ... So im modifying with Government census and with help of Government village administrative officers. And its not factual error fir your reference plz go to google maps http://goo.gl/maps/zF62I — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tharikcse (talk • contribs) 20:40, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Unclear Reasoning

Please help me understand why you undid my edit. I fixed a mistake on the page- a segment stated as fact but not backed up with any citations. I fixed the mistake and included a citation for the real data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnApparition (talk • contribs) 01:54, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Friendly reward

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks for your work on keeping vandals out of place!


If I could have time before you could have Huggle/STiki, I would present you humble, yet somewhat powerful, Lupin’s vandalism detection tool which I use in tandem with Twinkle to revert vandals.

Are you now missing the Minecraft Wiki?

— Nick the Red37 (talk · contribs) 17:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

User page vandalism

I also had my user page vandalized, but only once, particularly due to my lower activity, and it was my user talk page... To avoid user page vandalism, you can create a subpage that ends with .css or .js, store the user page contents there, and transclude it in your user page via {{User:ToonLucas22/userpage.css}} or {{User:ToonLucas22/userpage.js}}. CSS and JS subpages are intended to store user preferences, and hence they are protected to all except their author or users with the editusercss or edituserjs rights (typically admins). Also, you can even split the user page into multiple sections (example of this layout is here). — NickTheRed37 (0x54 · 0x43) 17:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

help

why do longshore drift occur in some beaches but not others????

Misunderstanding

Sorry, but User talk:89.101.55.51 is actually me, I forgot to log in. Thanks for reverting. --Babestress (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Gabucho181

This user is also vandalizing Spanish Wikipedia. Look at this for evidence. Dcbanners (talk) 22:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Wow, fun fact is that Spanish is my native language. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 23:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but the edits are stale, since they have been done about 2 years ago. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 23:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Anzac class frigate... technically correct

FYI, this edit you reverted as "Factual errors" is technically correct. At the time the frigates were built, CelsiusTech was Saab Technologies. -- saberwyn 10:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Spiro Agnew

Technically speaking, not a factual error, but I appreciate the revert! TJRC (talk) 18:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm trying to not fail

My username 'Loser3572003' Is actually special to me. it has been on everything since 2003, and I would hate for it to finally stop. and about Cubish, it makes me dream of something I've always wanted to accomplish. please do not ruin my dream... --Loser3572003 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loser3572003 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately, you have a WP:COI with the article's subject on Cubish, so the article may not be kept. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 22:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Cubish

Hello ToonLucas22. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Cubish to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

User talk pages

Please review WP:USERTALK: editors are allowed to remove comments in their own talk space. Talk pages are not articles and aren't subject to WP:OWN. You are hereby requested to stay off my talk page entirely. Not complying with this request is considered harassment. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-agf4

Template:Uw-agf4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 03:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Use of rollback

Hi. Please remember to not use rollback against edits that are not obviously non-constructive, as you did here. Those changes may have merited reversion (I have no opinion on this), but any reversion should have included an adequate summary. You did include an "editing tests" summary, but those edits were obviously not tests. I'm not sure if that was an accident or something, but yeah, unexplained or incorrectly explained reverts are bad in general, but are really something to avoid when using the rollback tool. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 23:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit to Dee Bradley Baker

Hi! I saw the message you left on my talk page about Dee Bradley Baker. An IP put an entire filmography at the end of the article, and I was removing it. My apologies for forgetting the edit summary - I've re-removed it, though, so you know. Thanks! NekoKatsun (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for accepting my Velvert Turner page. I was skeptical to whether or not people would realize his importance to music, but clearly you did. So thanks, again. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:57 March 5, 2015

February 2015

Information icon Hello Toonlucas22, I am Amitabhfan. Your recent edit to Endogenous gas does not make sence I did not revert it becuase I can not find it but the catagory is not gases because if people read the article they could get confused so would you please revert it. If you think my thinking is not right then we can dicide if we revert it or not. Thank you Amitabhfan (talk) 20:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Toonlucas22 I was wrong you did make a correct edit. Sorry for that Amitabhfan (talk) 21:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello ToonLucas22, I'm Aft197 and I'm new to doing stuff on Wikipedia, so I don't know what I did wrong when I tried to change the page for Welcome to: Our House to say that the next album Glass House comes out in 2015 instead of 2014, which has already passed.


.

why do longshore drift occur in some beaches but not others??? plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.50.167.70 (talk) 20:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Smoke

how is adding an image disruptive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihggvg (talk • contribs) 18:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Its not that adding an image was disruptive, but the image since it didn't belong to the article. --TL22 (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Malayalam cinema

Well done for spotting the edit war on Malayalam cinema and attempting to establish what the problem was. I note that you gave a warning to one user, but not the other. There are times when a user is allowed to revert to keep out inappropriate content, and those occasions are outlined at WP:NOT3RR. If the edit war does not involve any of those occasions, then it is best to give warnings to both parties. This keeps things, fair, balanced and neutral. Warning one and not the other can sometimes inflame people, and also prevent you from assisting any further in the incident as people might sometimes assume you are biased. No harm done here. Just a note for the future. SilkTork ✔Tea time 19:20, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Matt Andriese

Look, I get where you're coming from, but we in WP:BASEBALL use those "minor league player" pages as an incubation zone for players who may meet GNG, but we're not sure that they do, or players who don't but soon might. In this case, Andriese just made the major league roster, which means he will meet WP:BASE/N, once he debuts. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

I see. Altrough the IP should still have attempted to discuss at talk page rather than continuously being reckless. At least it didn't result in 3RR violation. --TL22 (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, well, you know how IPs can be, I'm sure. In this case no harm was meant, though 3RR could've become an issue. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

you undid the undoing of vandalisation done by followers of pastor Chris on his Wiki.

The wiki of pastor Chris is under constant editting by people who follow him and are constantly remove any content they dislike, like his divorce, or anything that makes him look bad. The page should be protected from people constantly removing them not to be protected by people who want to help the people by showing the good and the bad. In this case you restored their vandalisation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.140.132.203 (talk • contribs)

Oh. Well, gotta undo myself then. You may wish to request page protection at WP:RFPP. --TL22 (talk) 16:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Just saw the Triangle AfD

No! They don't confirm the Illuminati--triangles confirm Half-Life 3! (Or Portal 3, or something). :-) Origamiteⓣⓒ 21:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you are late for the joke. April Fools' Day ended 6 days ago. Don't worry, though, you can still wait the 359 remaining days! --TL22 (talk) 21:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

06:04:38, 9 April 2015 review of submission by Nimisha singhania


Nimisha singhania (talk) 06:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Please guide me how to fix my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nimisha_singhania/Leema_dhar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nimisha_singhania/Leema_dhar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nimisha_singhania/Leema_dhar what I have to do more to incorporate the page


Thanks!

Thank you for putting my edits in the right place I really appreciate that! Gameroffun (talk) 00:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Impossible Game (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— kikichugirl oh hello! 22:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Classified information Update

Hi,

I've just noticed that you rolled back my changes and didn't know why exactly. The definitions to the classification of documents is a field i work in directly and i was simply trying to update the contents of the page (which reference a severely outdated document from 2011) to the most up to date version which includes all internationally recognized classifications. Additionally, i added a second chart which included the "deprecated" classifications for reference purposes. Not exactly sure why you don't see this as a relevant update but ive included the link to the most up to date version for your review.

DOD Information Security Program: Marking of Classified Information (U) - Incorporating Change 2, March 19, 2013[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelboii60 (talk • contribs) 01:32, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Huggle

I just saw the change you made. I made a slight change and changed unconstructive to nonconstructive as the former is not a word according to spellchecker. Hope that's not a problem. :) - Amaury (talk) 01:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

TNA Knockouts Champion

hi, for some reason the image displaying terell was removed by a ImageRemovalBot and i am trying to restore it but having no luck. is there anyway you could restore it? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.130.85 (talk) 01:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) You can request undeletion at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. --TL22 (talk) 01:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Liberland article

Hello, I explained the reason for removing the paragraph in Lberland's article on the talkpage - the facts in there are not notable and come from self-published sources. --Escargoten (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Non-constructive explaining on not giving the PGA Tour video game articles.

Please tell me why PGA Tour Golf II, Tiger Woods PGA Tour 2000, Tiger Woods PGA Tour 2001, Tiger Woods PGA Tour 2002 aren't allowed to have their own articles while PGA Tour Golf, PGA Tour Golf III, PGA Tour 96, PGA Tour 97, PGA Tour 98, Tiger Woods 99 PGA Tour Golf get a free pass? 81.153.133.13 (talk) 00:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Didn't notice these articles. Anyways... --TL22 (talk) 00:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Um, OK. That doesn't really answer my question. 81.153.133.13 (talk) 00:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

.

Hi ToonLucas22, I'm tlwendt2 and I made an edit to the Birdman(film) page. The edit I recently made about the plot was no attempt of vandalism, but I was wondering if you could tell me why Cluebot NG removed it immediately? Is there any reason why no specific person made an edit to it? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlwendt2 (talk • contribs)

Proposed deletion of Waris Ali Bhutta

The article Waris Ali Bhutta has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Saqib (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

@Saqib: This actually seems to be a draft formerly on the user's talk page which wasn't sumbitted for review before move. I have reverted the changes and the move. --TL22 (talk) 20:05, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Waris Ali Bhutta

A tag has been placed on Waris Ali Bhutta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  sami  talk 20:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

PC reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

I have a message about editing Rebel Wilson

I am not sure if this is were I should be leaving this complaint. So please excuse my mistake if I am at the wrong place and fwd this to where it needs to be. I am contacting you because you left me a warning about editing Rebel Wilson's page. And I never did No such thang. I didnt even know that was a possibility. Now don't get me wrong I am not blind. I do see the Edit in the corner of the highlighted areas throughout the pages. But I didn't think anyone could just edit pages or bios. cause when I on Wikipedia I am usually looking u[ someone's bio because I have read or seen something on line and I am looking them up on wiki to get a understanding of who they are. Or I am cross checking some information that I seen or heard. So that tells you right there that I don't know enough of anything about whom I am using Wikipedia to get the information on that person. And the warning I received in April was about someone I never even heard of. I had to stop reading the message that someone else left to look the person up on here to see whom it was. And as for Rebel Wilson, I did look her up a few weeks ago. Right after my daughter told my that pitch perfect had a sequel. But I didn't change any of her information or add to it. Please tell me what I can do to stop this false accusation. Due to the fact that I did Not do any of the 2 editing that was said I done. I need to know my next step to stop this from happening again. I love this website and its where I come to get my information on everything. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.177.161.151 (talk) 02:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Five Night's at Freddy's

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Five Nights at Freddy's, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at WP:CITE and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheTMOBGaming2 (talk) 01:30, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

I added some web archive references. Hope that helps. --TL22 (talk) 01:35, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Looks good. Thank you. TheTMOBGaming2 (talk) 01:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


if you can do it one time you can do it another time as well

you just deleted my content because of personal attack. well im ok with it but then also remove the personal attack of Mr Sneeze A Lot, since he personally attacked me as well and just insinuated false things, indicating i were racist. this is personal attack as well--> delete this for personal attack too! greetingsJoobo (talk) 20:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

I don't see anything, nor you correctly specified. Please provide a diff of the comment of Mr Sneeze A Lot that you consider a personal attack. --TL22 (talk) 21:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

"[... but I think that Joobo may hate all Muslims ...]"Joobo (talk) 09:23, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Homophobia in ethnic minority communities

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Homophobia in ethnic minority communities you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Delldot -- Delldot (talk) 01:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Homophobia in ethnic minority communities

The article Homophobia in ethnic minority communities you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Homophobia in ethnic minority communities for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Delldot -- Delldot (talk) 02:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-dls

Template:Uw-dls has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Articles for Creation

Toon, when you move a misplaced Article for Creation, you have to tell the creator. If you don't, they re-create it thinking that it was deleted as not good enough - note the edit summary on the revision. I think the articles fine, so I remove the AFC tags, so I'm not sure what is normally done with the Draft namespace pages when AFCs are promoted. Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

For reverting Vandalism in my talk page!! Thank you! JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 03:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for nominating Kumoh National Institute of Technology for deletion. I trimmed the promotional content there. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:51, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

CallumCarey

CallumCarey only had one editor, who is the one that did the copy-paste move to Callum Carey. This is a bit of a quirk that most people don't know about, but the CC-BY-SA license system doesn't require the sole author to maintain attribution to his/her own work. As far as the license is concerned, it's no different from you working on something in your sandbox, blanking your sandbox, and pasting what you wrote into an article. It's good to be cautious, because if there is any copyrightable work, then we really need to keep it, but in this case, it's okay. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001_vol2.pdf
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Letcreate123/Archive_1&oldid=1137475967"