User talk:Liquidbenny
June 2024
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Strontium-90, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wiiformii (talk) 21:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I have again reverted your addition to strontium-90 because it does not conform with Wikipedia's policy on verifiability and guideline on including popular culture references. Such inclusions are often frowned upon because not every pop culture reference is inherently noteworthy – even when sources exist – and they can grow into lists of trivia, which fall under what Wikipedia is not. I instead added a hatnote on top of the page pointing to Materials science in science fiction, an article which specificially focuses on pop culture references that do not merit inclusion in the articles about the real materials. Feel free to reach out if you have further questions. Complex/Rational 23:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)